26 mp3's for Cash | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 314 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613474
Today 12
Topics 127502
  
 
Messageboard index
26 mp3's for Cash
 

offline Duble0Syx from Columbus, OH (United States) on 2004-10-02 11:01 [#01350833]
Points: 3436 Status: Lurker



I think I'll post a sample of the Heroe's track just to make
a point on how big a difference there is.


 

offline Duble0Syx from Columbus, OH (United States) on 2004-10-02 11:09 [#01350839]
Points: 3436 Status: Lurker



SAMPLE
Check it out. It's a 10 sec sample off the original cd from
2:30-2:40. If you can't hear a difference you need better
speakers/ears.


 

offline thecurbcreeper from United States on 2004-10-02 11:55 [#01350886]
Points: 6045 Status: Lurker



this is interesting

nice work


 

offline Cheffe1979 from fuck (Austria) on 2004-10-02 12:21 [#01350906]
Points: 4630 Status: Lurker | Followup to Duble0Syx: #01350839



i was not saying that you can never hear a difference...
just that you can nowadays encode in really good quality and
that this whole discussion is a bit idiological sometimes.

an interesting thing you found there..


 

offline dopper from Bern (Switzerland) on 2004-10-02 13:29 [#01350922]
Points: 436 Status: Addict



poirot will be shaking in his boots!


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2004-10-02 14:03 [#01350934]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular | Followup to elusive: #01350766



if its loud enough, you can hear 25 khz...

out of all people you should know elusive!


 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2004-10-02 14:31 [#01350944]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker | Followup to Duble0Syx: #01350839



um, that wav there is way quieter than my 160kbps mp3 that i
ripped from the cd. Mine sounds better


 

offline Duble0Syx from Columbus, OH (United States) on 2004-10-02 14:45 [#01350950]
Points: 3436 Status: Lurker



Louder does not mean it sounds better. That wav is from the
japanese cd that has the original track. Maybe you like the
dull sounding version on 26 mixes and thats fine, but
perhaps listen to the sound quality and not the volume.


 

offline idle interloper on 2004-10-02 14:50 [#01350952]
Points: 418 Status: Lurker



That's pretty piss-poor.
I mean, it's one thing if they couldn't find the masters for
some of the tracks, and the only source of the track still
available is an mp3, so they used it,
but it is inexcusable if a fan can find an original copy and
compare to the album version, but the label was too lazy to
find an original copy, and just took the easy way out.
And I'm sure there's a few other remixes that Rich has
done, floating around, that never got released, for one
reason or another. But we all know it can be very dangerous
for the aficionados to hear anything new to them or
unreleased.


 

offline Duble0Syx from Columbus, OH (United States) on 2004-10-02 15:12 [#01350957]
Points: 3436 Status: Lurker | Followup to idle interloper: #01350952



There were several remixes that did not make it onto 26
Mixes as well as several that were shortened for the
release.
Seefeel - Polyfusia - 09 Time to Find Me (AFX Slow Mix)
Gavin Bryars & Aphex Twin - Raising the Titanic - 01 Raising
the Titanic (Edit)
Jesus Jones - Zeroes & Ones - 04 Zeroes & Ones (Aphex Twin
Reconstruction Mix #1)
Nav Katze - Never Mind the Distortion - 02 Ziggy (Aphex Twin
Mix #1)
Beck - The New Pollution (Disc 1) - 02 Richard's Hairpiece
(Remixed by Aphex Twin)
Meat Beat Manifesto - Mindstream - 05 Mindstream (The Aphex
Twin Remix)
Saint Etienne - Who Do You Think You Are - 03 Who Do You
Think You Are (quex-rd)
Soft Ballet - Twist and Turn - 10 Sand Lowe (Polygon Window
Remix)

None of those are on the cd's.


 

offline deepspace9mm from filth on 2004-10-02 15:22 [#01350961]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict



Ah, that beck remix is shit anyway. I wouldn't care if i
never heard it again. Despite not even having 26 wanks for
cash, i'm glad it's not on there.


 

offline Vin3islih from United Kingdom on 2004-10-02 15:58 [#01350986]
Points: 1066 Status: Regular



Urghh.. mp3 sourced stuff being released officially. I
didn't even think this were possible. I mean how stupid.
Did the masters disappear into Richard's bank vault never to
be found.........


 

offline Duble0Syx from Columbus, OH (United States) on 2004-10-02 16:16 [#01351004]
Points: 3436 Status: Lurker



Maybe they lost some of the cd's? After the Heroes remix
was on a 3" cd. Must have been misplaced in their mountains
of cd and demos.


 

offline Cheffe1979 from fuck (Austria) on 2004-10-03 01:49 [#01351339]
Points: 4630 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #01350766



you don't actually hear a certain tone in that range but you
can tell that something is there. how much this
depends on the setup (background noise of the speakers below
that frequency and such) i can't tell.

we measured this thing actually


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-10-03 01:59 [#01351340]
Points: 18367 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



"if its loud enough, you can hear 25 khz...

out of all people you should know elusive!
"


um, no.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-10-03 02:00 [#01351341]
Points: 18367 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



seriousloy, what the fuk man,,,,,,,,,,,,


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-10-03 02:10 [#01351346]
Points: 18367 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Cheffe1979,

so do we now need to start discussing and arguing just what
exactly is "hearing"

i hope now


 

offline Cheffe1979 from fuck (Austria) on 2004-10-03 03:16 [#01351360]
Points: 4630 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #01351346



i really don't care, mate

how are things going with your hardrive btw?


 

offline Cheffe1979 from fuck (Austria) on 2004-10-03 03:17 [#01351361]
Points: 4630 Status: Lurker



oh and i think we have the same person in our avatars


 

offline Cheffe1979 from fuck (Austria) on 2004-10-03 03:19 [#01351363]
Points: 4630 Status: Lurker



oh and chances are that mentioned guys would only pretend to
hear something. wahtever


 

offline nacmat on 2004-10-03 03:49 [#01351368]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



whatever hapenned this thread has meant the best reading in
this mB in many days

and I learnt a lot


 

offline Morton from out (Netherlands, The) on 2004-10-03 05:01 [#01351381]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict



of course the originals were on RDJ's lost laptop


 

offline nacmat on 2004-10-03 05:47 [#01351396]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



this thread made want to listen to the album... I amnow with
cd1

its great really


 

offline big from lsg on 2004-10-03 05:58 [#01351400]
Points: 23624 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



i regret the day i have to complete my aphex collection by
buying this, as saw 1 and 2 as well, since i think this is
all crap


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-10-03 06:09 [#01351406]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to big: #01351400



they all have historic value though :)


 

offline nacmat on 2004-10-03 06:10 [#01351408]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01351400



well.... saw 1 and 2 is not crap really.... its more like...
a total masterpiece


 

offline big from lsg on 2004-10-03 06:20 [#01351414]
Points: 23624 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



i have on now, and i think it's just so so


 

offline nacmat on 2004-10-03 06:34 [#01351420]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01351414



on is another masterpiece

I think all that richard did till 95 is pretty much the best
music one can find

aphex music is not perfect... but it doesnt need to be
perfect to be the most exciting and beautiful


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-10-03 10:17 [#01351523]
Points: 18367 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Cheffe, you have ME in your avatar,

and my hdd is outa commission, still waiting to do data
recovery on it (attempt) but i've been so busy I haven't had
time to sit down for 5hours and sort it all out :/

soon...


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-10-03 10:24 [#01351528]
Points: 18367 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



and Cheffe, i agree with youthat people AREN'T hearing those
freqs, but noise from the speakers. Not sure how J4roen is
hearing 25khz because he "turned it louder" ... ok ?

but iknow what you're saying.

I'm referring to the very sensitive devices that output
those frequencies in the testers


 

offline Duble0Syx from Columbus, OH (United States) on 2004-10-03 15:06 [#01351914]
Points: 3436 Status: Lurker



A cd's frequency range is only 22,500hz. I think most
people could here the difference between something that has
no frequencies above 16Khz and the same thing with
frequencies up to 22Khz. Check the sample I posted with the
same section form the 26 Mixes version and it's very
obvious. Either way i just goes to show WAPR got lazy and
that record companies may as well continue using mp3's for
sources since a lot of people seem to think they sound
"better" and other can't tell.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-10-03 16:14 [#01352014]
Points: 18367 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



stil waiting for jaroen to explain

"if its loud enough, you can hear 25 khz...

out of all people you should know elusive!"


seriously.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-10-03 16:28 [#01352033]
Points: 14292 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01351400



Selected Ambient Works 1 and 2?

You're so fucking out of it.


 

offline big from lsg on 2005-05-12 17:16 [#01596873]
Points: 23624 Status: Regular | Followup to mappatazee: #01352033 | Show recordbag



okay i like 85-92 :)
it's not real ambient imo


 


Messageboard index