compression | xltronic messageboard

�

You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in
Register

�

Now online (2)
recycle
big
...and 610 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...

Members 8025
Messages 2614128
Today 0
Topics 127542

Messageboard index
compression

oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-09-03 17:21 [#01323749]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular

i know that i'm no good at compression - most of the time i
use the presets in TrackS and i know i shouldn't :(

i really wanna try and get compression right, especially
since i'm hoping to start on some new material that is
gig-worthy.

my stuff doesn't seem to be as big as i'd like it to be, i
mean i want huge drums but i still want my synths and
"textures" to be heard as well, and i don't seem to be able
to get both :(

i was thinking - would it be better to compress different
things differently? like, say export only bass synths from
Reason, compress them with a suitable setting, then export
drums and compress those, export anything else and compress
that and then bring it all back together?

or is that overkill?

i really need help guys and gals :(

qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-09-03 17:25 [#01323761]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to oscillik: #01323749

apparently, it's better to use seperate compression on each
of the tracks.

I don't really bother with compression in the classic sense
though.

elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-09-03 17:27 [#01323762]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag

are you planning on doing static compression, or a form of
dynamic variable comp.

oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-09-03 17:27 [#01323767]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to qrter: #01323761

i use compression on my drums in Reason, but i know that the
compressor in Reason is a bit naff.

for my "mastering" i use Peak 4.12 and TrackS AU........i
usually end up using the "Loud and Clear" preset most of the
time :(

oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-09-03 17:31 [#01323773]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to elusive: #01323762

erm.....by static do you mean just doing the whole track in
one as a stereo file, or compressing individual tracks?

dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2004-09-03 17:31 [#01323774]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag

Raaaaaaaars are more effective than Zips.

elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-09-03 17:32 [#01323776]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag

I'm not familiar with the music applications, but I'll keep
an eye on this thread for relevent questions pertaining to
compression and algorithms.

oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-09-03 17:33 [#01323780]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular

dog_belch

.sitx are more efffective than .zip .rar .lzh .arj .cab

elusive

i really wish i could get the hang of it :(

troubleworks from Moscow (Russia) on 2004-09-03 18:02 [#01323808]
Points: 115 Status: Addict | Followup to oscillik: #01323780

PAQAR is the best. Compare yourself.

elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-09-03 18:16 [#01323826]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag

Pissing match.

Messageboard index