 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 (nobody)...and 434 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2614128 Today 0 Topics 127542 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
haven't listened to ae in months! according to audioscrobbler, neither have you! viva le revioasdifalsdkfla |
||||||||
| Attached picture | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i always get sentimental when i see an autechre thread. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Chiastic slide is no a super-heated plastic puddle! ARRGGHHH!!! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
whoa what? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i reckon everyone feels warm and fuzzy when they hear Chiastic Slide... it reminds me of butterflies and flowers... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
keep me away from your vision of nature |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yes, please explain the imagery |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
This makes me want to visit jesus related messageboards and post humorous pictures of melting plastic jesus figures. I wonder if posting pictures of burning US flags is illegal. I'm not even certain if doing it in public is or not actually. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
burning US flags is illegal. don't know about foreign ones--it's probably recommended |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
hahaha |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I dare you to post a picture of yourself burning a US flag. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
stars and wipes |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
If to talk about Chiastic Slide - it's my least favourite Ae release. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Chiastic Slide is my fave, probably because i've never heard it. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
thats fucking sick, burning any ae album, especially chiastic slide i really hope you only held a lighter next to it and didnt burn it you sick individual! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Chiastic Slide. :( |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i have never heard this album :( i only own LP5.......am i a bad person? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
YOU SICK FUCK |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
YES chiastic slide is sooo awesome... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
no, you're not a bad person... you don't need lots of Autechre, unless you love it and listen to it very often... = ) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
...people who haven't heard any would be missing out though. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
its just like cheese, if you get bored with it just dont eat/listen to it for a while, then after a while get back to it |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
well i hadn't listened to "ep7" for years... i don't know why, i just wanted to try it again today. so now i'm listening to it, but it brings me the same impression than years ago. maybe i'll listen to it in its entirety, but just as background music, and because i don't feel like listening to something in particular. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
this said, when i concentrate on the music, i can get why people think it's awesome. it's definitely not meant to be background music is it? maybe i can't concentrate enough to love it all the time like some people seem to do : | |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
ahahah!!! sneakattack is so fucking vintage it hurts my elbow! Three cheers for sneak!!! hip hip hurray! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
nevermind, it does sounds better now that i got used to it after some tracks and activated my "brain" a little. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I'll use that pic as a wallpaper since now on |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
fire is fun chiastic slide is not |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
whoa shit guys, I'm sitting here alone on a saturday night reading a technical manual, and this brings a tear to my eye. JAroen pointed out ilkae's 'bring extra dragons' to me today; I highly recommend it. |
||||||||
| Attached picture | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
you need to up the iterations a bit. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
The interation cap is not effecting the image there in any way whatsoever. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
ahahah that picture 2 up from my post is rad hahahah acutally poped in autechre's-radio mix about 5 minutes ago, deja vu |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
as an image, no, it doesn't :) but my math bit of brain is going 'mandelbrot... set... not... clearly... defined.... nnnggghh!' *explodes* |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
there are plenty of recursive functions that have no (discovered) closed form--is the recursion what you're referring to as well defined? It's well precisely defined, and furthermore in this case easily handled since a relation can be made between iterations and resolution.. I always hit floating point accuracy limits way before I hit iterations being a problem (and a thorough system would implement it's own >64 bit floating point computation .. ) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
the number of iterations required to keep the set as well defined as it is when you're viewing, say the full set... the region {[-2,-2],[2,2]}, increases exponentially the further you magnify it. i'd wager that image is at 150-200 iterations. i'd put it at 500-700. the black region is the set, and if you increased the iteration, that would be more clearly defined. just imo though. as an image it's nice |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
and I'm saying that at this magnification, the black region will not change at all, and neither will the colorings, which are the standard inner coloring technique of using using f(x) where x is the iteration which cause that point to be proven not in the set. You can systematically determine (not just eyeballing) whether you need more iterations, which is what I was saying. As is in this case. Shit like this is the foundation of efficient computer graphics (determine how much you have to draw, and then draw (might involve higher subdivisions in some places against the baseline, ignoring others, more in others). |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
) urp, forgot end paren |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
oh man i'm not getting into an argument about fractals on an internet messageboard i might make a topic tomorrow |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
There's nothing to argue. I'm making simple arguments about implementation of rendering algorithms. As an example I'd like to point out that there is no curved surface, hell there is no _surface_. Anything you touch is vacuous, but my visual perception can't crack this. Similarly using a textured rectangle to simulate a network of revolving sub atomic particles fools a human. Simalarly more iterations will not change that. that's my point. I'm not saying anything about the bounds of the set being fickle--I'm taking it from an engineering standpoint. the gavel falls, I'm going out to have a cigarette. OH SHIT I just realized I don't notice it any more when anus double's his Rs |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
mother fucking </I> . why am I so tired today? fucking lame question. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
oh shit #2, double's .. ok I'm not looking at this anymore goodnight |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Sneakattack, I feel compelled to point out that in the USA, if an american flag touches the ground, you are expected to burn it. I don't know why myself, a canadian, would know this and most americans don't. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
you are correct about burning the american flag your supposed to take it down during bad weather light it at night but most americans, well not most, but there are a lot that make me sad sometimes, well not sometimes but a lot of time |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yeah, the ilkae stuff is great. best thing he did imo |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
