saw 85-92 cd | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
dariusgriffin
belb
...and 74 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2609089
Today 11
Topics 127242
  
 
Messageboard index
saw 85-92 cd
 

nacmat from spain on 2002-01-13 18:50 [#00069205]



my saw 85-92 cd doesnt have very good cuality of sound,
above all in the first tracks. is it normal? is it because
of how it was loaded?


 

Xanatos from NYC on 2002-01-13 18:54 [#00069206]



I don't think mine has any problem like that...seems
abnormal.


 

wayout from a plastic bubble on 2002-01-13 21:34 [#00069271]



xtal has always seemed a but fuzzy on my copy..


 

BRIDUV from USA on 2002-01-13 21:43 [#00069275]



that is abnormal mine was burned from an original but it
does not falter in sound quality



 

jand from Chelmsford,Essex,Uk on 2002-01-14 11:02 [#00069665]



A few of the SAW traxs were mastered from crappy cassettes
that RDJ did for his mates... XTALs (the first track) is the
most obvious example (with bits of tape hiss etc..)...


 

thorpe from www.hepburnenthorpe.zzn.com on 2002-01-14 14:55 [#00069739]



yeah, i thought XTALS sounded a bit off in bits. sounds like
the tape was a little worn even, a bit wobbly. its cool
though once you get used to it.

thorpe


 

doki from grmny on 2002-01-14 14:57 [#00069740]



i like the raw sound of that record very much ... has
something more "live" to it ...


 

jand from Chelmsford,Essex,Uk on 2002-01-14 15:13 [#00069748]



agreed, doki...a lot of the charm of SAWI comes from it not
sounding too polished or over-produced...

Another good example of Tape Wobble is the beginning of the
Mike P remix of ON...mastered straight from the cassette
that Mike gave RDJ...



 

doki from grmny on 2002-01-14 16:13 [#00069758]



it´s funny cause i also like that superproduced stuff (like
i would say the druqks lp) but it has to be without any
fault, know what i mean? if superproduced than please in a
perfect way, cause glitches would sound way too disturbing
and not charming anymore ... on the other hand there´s this
more "homemade" sound i love cause it´s like i said more
live to me ... and it doesn´t fuck me up that much when i
listen to my own stuff, hehe ... ;-)


 

The_Funkmaster from Newfoundland, Canada on 2002-01-14 17:09 [#00069787]



personally I'm for the perfect production stuff most... but
it's not a must... if it doesn't sound perfect, then that's
fine... like older recordings I like, and they definately
aren't perfect sound quality...


 

Peaches on 2002-01-14 17:13 [#00069788]



It's like digital air conditioning compared to fresh air
blah, blah, blah........


 


Messageboard index