Pitchfork vs. The Wire | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (5)
w M w
Wolfslice
Gwely Mernans
Hyperflake
recycle
...and 337 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2615575
Today 35
Topics 127657
  
 
Messageboard index
Pitchfork vs. The Wire
 

offline weltact from Taiwan on 2004-06-26 07:04 [#01256833]
Points: 1258 Status: Regular



how would u compare these two magazines writers... and
overall quality...


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-06-26 07:16 [#01256840]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



the Wire is better but it's not really all that fair to
compare the two, because they really have very different
target audiences...


 

offline hobbes from age on 2004-06-26 07:18 [#01256844]
Points: 8168 Status: Lurker



also the Wire doesn't just review music.


 

offline weltact from Taiwan on 2004-06-26 07:24 [#01256847]
Points: 1258 Status: Regular



i wouldnt say wire is better
cuz i think theyre much more pretentious and lit brag then
pitchfork, and therefore unhelpful..
plus i think, pitchfork writers have much more sense of
humour..

but ure right about the audiences


 

offline DJ Xammax from not America on 2004-06-26 07:30 [#01256853]
Points: 11512 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeadEight: #01256840



It's so irritating that critics would have a target
audience.. I think they should just remember what their
fucking job is.


 

offline weltact from Taiwan on 2004-06-26 07:34 [#01256855]
Points: 1258 Status: Regular | Followup to DJ Xammax: #01256853



u cant really get away from that
cuz the style of their writings and their favoured artists
will instantly determine audience..
thats inevitable


 

offline DJ Xammax from not America on 2004-06-26 07:41 [#01256857]
Points: 11512 Status: Lurker | Followup to weltact: #01256855



They shouldn't be thinking about who is going to be reading
the review, they should just be writing a review which
weighs up the good and bad about a record. That's all.


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-06-26 07:43 [#01256859]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular | Followup to DJ Xammax: #01256853



perhaps i didn't choose my words properly... you bring up a
good point... all i really mean is that at the Wire, they
make certain assumptions about what you already now about
certain aspects of music, so that they can be more probing
and thorough in their descriptions of what they discuss,
which for the most part is experimental music... avant jazz,
free improv, free folk, eai, post-rock, post-punk (more pere
ubu than interpol), etc.
i'd almost describe the Wire as a scholarly magazine, the
kind you cite in a paper for your university or something...
now some people are bound to see this as pretentious, but
really they shouldn't complain because there are plenty of
other music magazines under the sun that they can stroke
their ego with... the Wire is an opportunity for like-minded
readers and writers across the globe to advance musical
discourse, and while i sometimes find it going over my head,
i know there are people out there who find it infinitely
more useful because it isn't dumbing itself down for me...


 

offline weltact from Taiwan on 2004-06-26 07:54 [#01256863]
Points: 1258 Status: Regular | Followup to DeadEight: #01256859



ure right
but u have to admit that in the wire its often just jerking
off, showing how great writers they r, even though they know
noone will understand a word of it, and exactly that gives
them great pleasure, cuz people tend to regard things that
they dont understand as profound, and that makes wire
writers look kool
whereas in pitchfork theyre doiing similar thing often, but
with humour that nonacademic ppl can relate to
and thats what its all about...
reading music critic=having fun while discovering new
things

i think wire guys lost the fun moment somewhere along the
way..


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-06-26 08:05 [#01256864]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



i see what you mean but i'm not really willing to condemn
either entity as having lost the fun, or not really caring
about the music anymore, or just about any other criticism
that seems to get levelled at these kinds of publications...
nothing about what i see from either says anything about
the writers of these magazines other than that they love
music to pieces... maybe for the pitchfork writer it's Led
Zeppelin's IV, maybe for the wire writer it's Coltrane's
Ascension... but regardless, the passion is there, and it's
deep rooted... at my reading level, i'm definitely more
likely to find pitchfork's writing amusing... but i can also
say that i look forward to the day when i catch more than
10% of the jokes being made in the pages of the Wire
(they're there... instead of funny conceits its tongue and
cheek play with how one compares someone's music to Brian
Eno... welll those are the ones i get, anyway... :P)


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-06-26 08:06 [#01256865]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular | Followup to weltact: #01256833



welcome to the board, by the way... you sound like you'll be
interesting to talk to :)


 

offline weltact from Taiwan on 2004-06-26 08:26 [#01256870]
Points: 1258 Status: Regular | Followup to DeadEight: #01256865



thx

btw i was hoping for that thay to come for last 8 years
and it never comes :)

everytime i buy wire, i skim through it and feel deceited,
and i give it a second chance, a more concentrated read, and
i feel even more pissed off
theyre really gettin on my nerves, i donno maybe its just
envy cuz im not capable of understanding it

but than again the day that wire publishes their yearly
rewind is always the most expected day of the year :)


 

offline deepspace9mm from filth on 2004-06-26 10:28 [#01256911]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict



FATALITY!!11 WIRE WINS!!111

Seriously, i've heard so much new music through reading the
wire it's untrue. Plus the wire tapper cds are top notch.


 

offline acrid milk hall from United Kingdom on 2004-06-26 11:30 [#01256941]
Points: 2916 Status: Lurker | Followup to DJ Xammax: #01256857



xammax - sorry to disappoint you, but they're trying to run
a business. if they don't know their target audience, then
they would have folded a long time ago.
if you know the kind of people that make up your readership
you can work harder to keep them entertained and interested.
there's no point publishing something that won't appeal to
them at all.
perhaps even more crucially, you need to know who buys your
mag so you can form an accurate audience demographic. this
can be presented to the kind of companies that might benefit
from advertising space in your publication. because it's
their money, and not that of your readership, that keeps the
mag afloat.


 

offline weltact from Taiwan on 2004-06-26 11:59 [#01256950]
Points: 1258 Status: Regular | Followup to acrid milk hall: #01256941



yea its a bich that every mag needs sponsors who r willing
to pay ALOT of money in order for it to stay alive... let
alone anything else

thats why nme and mixmag and muzik all lost the plot long
time ago...

like dj shadow would say
"why hip hop sucks in 96"

its .../the mOney...


 

offline acrid milk hall from United Kingdom on 2004-06-26 12:02 [#01256953]
Points: 2916 Status: Lurker



yeah

it's a fine balance..

there's a way of doing what you have to do without
compromising too much, but no one can keep that going
forever.

you have to know when to quit.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2004-06-26 13:10 [#01257029]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



well i love The Wire despite all it's faults and i hate
Pitchfork.


 

offline weltact from Taiwan on 2004-06-26 16:37 [#01257198]
Points: 1258 Status: Regular



love and hate r the same emotion


 

offline Torley Wong on 2004-06-27 02:28 [#01257516]
Points: 235 Status: Lurker



I find a lot of these reviews really colorful, but I don't
get a lot of the cultural references for whatever reason (?)
and I'd rather just listen to the music sometimes as soon as
possible instead of wading through long paragraphs.

I know Frank Zappa said something like "Writing about music
is like dancing about architecture", and sometimes it's even
more absurd than that. So fundamentally, I don't find most
music reviews helpful in guiding me as to what to listen to
-- more likely I'll head to somewhere like smokecds.com or
juno.co.uk and have a listen if I have a chance.

Explosions of genre names bemuse me. :|


 

offline acrid milk hall from United Kingdom on 2004-06-27 04:16 [#01257603]
Points: 2916 Status: Lurker | Followup to Torley Wong: #01257516



me too


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2004-06-27 04:54 [#01257634]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to weltact: #01257198



they arre not. next.


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-06-27 04:58 [#01257636]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



The Wire is by far the best


 

offline weltact from Taiwan on 2004-06-27 10:39 [#01257765]
Points: 1258 Status: Regular



ok
could everyone write down his own opinion on what makes wire
"good" or "the best"
im just curious...its an interesting debate...



 

offline mortsto-x from Trondheim/Bodø (Norway) on 2004-06-27 14:10 [#01257902]
Points: 8062 Status: Lurker



The Wire is much better. Because they know what they're
talking about, have more depht, and don't slaughter an album
just because they have had a bad day.


 

offline weltact from Taiwan on 2004-06-28 03:39 [#01258402]
Points: 1258 Status: Regular



they do slaughter, but in an academic kind of way


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2004-06-28 03:43 [#01258403]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular | Followup to weltact: #01257198



are you a retard or what


 

offline weltact from Taiwan on 2004-06-28 03:51 [#01258413]
Points: 1258 Status: Regular | Followup to JAroen: #01258403



no, i just think too much
try it sometimes, maybe you'll get to understand some
things

best regards


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2004-06-28 04:00 [#01258422]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular



Love is a very vague word in English. It can mean an intense
feeling of affection, an emotion or emotional state. It can
mean to act in a way which considers someone else`s needs as
more important than your own. It can also be used to
describe a feeling of attraction towards a person in a
romantic and/or physical sense. This is sometimes called
romantic love to distinguish it from affection between
family members or friends or between human beings and their
pets. Love is also a deep liking for something (anything).
Special love is a special affection for someone or
something, a feeling or emotion. Unhealthy love is the
sharing or desire to share something which would not be good
for you or the object of your desire.

Hate or hatred is an emotion of intense revulsion, distaste,
enmity, or antipathy for a person, thing, or phenomenon; a
desire to avoid, restrict, remove, or destroy its object.

Hatred can be based on fear of its object, justified or
unjustified, or past negative consequences of dealing with
that object.

Hatred is often described as the opposite of love or
friendship; others consider the opposite of love to be
indifference. See love-hate relationship.

"Hate" or "hatred" are also used to describe feelings of
prejudice or bigotry against a group of people, such as
racism, religious prejudice, or homophobia, especially when
these are particularly intense. Hate crimes are crimes
committed out of hatred in this sense.

__

wikipedia thinks you are a self righteous bastard who is not
aware of the letters 'yo' preceding the 'u' when typing
'you'


 

offline weltact from Taiwan on 2004-06-28 04:06 [#01258427]
Points: 1258 Status: Regular | Followup to JAroen: #01258422



do u have a girlfriend?


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2004-06-28 04:11 [#01258431]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular



im sorry im so hungry its not healthy anymore, it makes me
attack random people

ill leave


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-06-28 04:18 [#01258437]
Points: 14295 Status: Lurker



Italian has words for many kinds of love. When there are
lots of words for one subject, it says a lot about the
culture. Like Eskimos having so many words for snow/ice.
There are lots of words for sex in our language though.


 


Messageboard index