Bush Ejects Two From Bioethics Council | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 247 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614059
Today 3
Topics 127538
  
 
Messageboard index
Bush Ejects Two From Bioethics Council
 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2004-03-05 13:44 [#01100402]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



no matter what your politics are, how can you be in support
of an administration that consistently gives the public
blatant lies? isn't it just silly?

the first question, answered with a lie. the second, not an
answer to the question but rather an the question itself
repeated, in a slightly more elaborated manner, in the form
of a general answer. IT'S TOO ABSURD!

<spokeswoman Erin Healy said the two members' terms had
expired in January, and they were on "holdover status."
Asked whether, in fact, all the council members' terms had
formally expired in January, she said they had.

Pressed on why Blackburn and May had been singled out for
dismissal, she said: "We've decided to go ahead and appoint
other individuals with different expertise and experience."
She would not elaborate further.>>


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2004-03-05 13:45 [#01100411]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



oh, this is from a washington post article: lentil soup


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-03-05 14:02 [#01100458]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to jupitah: #01100402



the Administration itself is the biggest lie. they were NOT
elected.

the mind boggles when I hear all these people say "we've got
to vote Bush out of the Whitehouse now!" - he did not win
the election in the first place, he brazenly waltzed into
the Whitehouse and hardly anybody did anything!

why would things be different this time around?


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2004-03-05 14:03 [#01100465]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



oh the shit.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2004-03-05 14:09 [#01100475]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to qrter: #01100458



well, it's true that this administration is either bogus, as
you and many others insist, or at the very least
contraversial (i'm not up on it enough to know for sure),
but the circumstances that allowed them to pull the strings
that they may have pulled include the extremely close vote.
wouldn't the criminality be of another level entirely if the
vote were to be further stratified against bush? i haven't
given up hope.

all american's who can vote, educate yourself with absolute
honesty.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-03-05 15:34 [#01100631]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Diebold is programming the computers to let Bush win by a
wider margin this time, so expect less controversy.

Also, remember that Kerry is another Yalie and a Skull and
Bones man so don't be surprised if he obligingly takes a
fall in the third round - the tentacle up his ass likely
belongs to the same octopus as the one up Bush's ass.


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2004-03-05 17:17 [#01100769]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



you don't like kerry, either. When are you people going to
shut up then?


 

offline scup_bucket from bloated exploding piss pockets on 2004-03-05 17:34 [#01100782]
Points: 4540 Status: Regular



i hate governments.


 


Messageboard index