|
|
happy cycling
from berlin on 2004-02-22 10:30 [#01084230]
Points: 2786 Status: Regular
|
|
nader to run for president.
is he a fucking republican secret agent or what??
|
|
virginpusher
from County Clare on 2004-02-22 10:33 [#01084234]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker
|
|
wow! look at all the options!!!
*sigh*
|
|
PigeonSt
from Detroit on 2004-02-22 10:33 [#01084235]
Points: 1780 Status: Regular
|
|
flourecent toilet paper is dangersous
damn nadersucks.com is down
|
|
tlink
from sofla (United States) on 2004-02-22 10:33 [#01084237]
Points: 403 Status: Regular
|
|
Allright, 4 more years for W.
|
|
virginpusher
from County Clare on 2004-02-22 10:34 [#01084238]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to tlink: #01084237
|
|
thats what i was thinking
|
|
DeadEight
from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-02-22 10:36 [#01084239]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular
|
|
i don't thinik it will matter much... anyone who would vote for nader recognizes the importance of getting bush out at all costs, and thus, would vote for the democrat instead...
it's really fucked up that one can't encourage third parties for run for fear of having the world fucked over by a very established political party
|
|
fleetmouse
from Horny for Truth on 2004-02-22 10:38 [#01084242]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker
|
|
"Go ahead - throw away your vote!" - Kang
|
|
tlink
from sofla (United States) on 2004-02-22 10:40 [#01084244]
Points: 403 Status: Regular | Followup to DeadEight: #01084239
|
|
I agree. American political system could use some change. There used to be a American Communist Party, but leader of that party was sent to jail in 1948...
Of course i wouldn't vote for a fucking commie, but anyway change would do good.
|
|
DeadEight
from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-02-22 10:42 [#01084245]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular
|
|
everything that Nader says about the two parties is correct... but it'll probably take at least another 8 years worth of hardship before americans come around to the extent that someone like nader would even have a remote chance...
|
|
tlink
from sofla (United States) on 2004-02-22 10:45 [#01084248]
Points: 403 Status: Regular | Followup to DeadEight: #01084245
|
|
It's not going to happen ever. Those parties own this country and big corporations own them. Well i hope that they increase chocolate rations ;)
|
|
earthleakage
from tell the world you're winning on 2004-02-22 10:50 [#01084250]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular
|
|
in the end bush will win everyone over with his wit, charm and intelligence
|
|
Xanatos
from New York City (United States) on 2004-02-22 10:50 [#01084251]
Points: 3316 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
Exactly. Anyone who tells Nader not to run doesn't believe in democracy, they believe in a two party figurehead oligarchy.
How sure are you all think Gore wouldn't have gone to war in Iraq?
|
|
Torture Garden
from Feelin' 2Pacish on 2004-02-22 11:07 [#01084266]
Points: 974 Status: Lurker
|
|
The American system definitely needs change, i study politics over here and i know exactly what you guys are saying. But i tell you something, we have it worse over here. At least there is some kind of representation over there, especially locally.
Tony Blair just doesn't give a fuck and if doesn't care then government won't because they'll be forced to resign if they go against the party lines.
|
|
bogala
from NYC (United States) on 2004-02-22 13:49 [#01084450]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular
|
|
Nader is too socialist to ever win. He would put so much regulations on everything no one could stay in business. He get what he wanted. Everyone would go to the government for all their needs.
|
|
kochlear
from aud-stim.com on 2004-02-22 14:02 [#01084468]
Points: 2311 Status: Addict | Followup to Xanatos: #01084251
|
|
what reason would gore have to go to war in iraq? he doesn't get his intelligence from exxon.
|
|
Messageboard index
|