nader to run? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
Hyperflake
...and 97 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614069
Today 13
Topics 127541
  
 
Messageboard index
nader to run?
 

offline happy cycling from berlin on 2004-02-22 10:30 [#01084230]
Points: 2786 Status: Regular



nader to run for president.

is he a fucking republican secret agent or what??


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2004-02-22 10:33 [#01084234]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker



wow! look at all the options!!!

*sigh*


 

offline PigeonSt from Detroit on 2004-02-22 10:33 [#01084235]
Points: 1780 Status: Regular



flourecent toilet paper is dangersous

damn nadersucks.com is down


 

offline tlink from sofla (United States) on 2004-02-22 10:33 [#01084237]
Points: 403 Status: Regular



Allright, 4 more years for W.


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2004-02-22 10:34 [#01084238]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to tlink: #01084237



thats what i was thinking


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-02-22 10:36 [#01084239]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



i don't thinik it will matter much... anyone who would vote
for nader recognizes the importance of getting bush out at
all costs, and thus, would vote for the democrat instead...


it's really fucked up that one can't encourage third parties
for run for fear of having the world fucked over by a very
established political party


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-02-22 10:38 [#01084242]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



"Go ahead - throw away your vote!" - Kang


 

offline tlink from sofla (United States) on 2004-02-22 10:40 [#01084244]
Points: 403 Status: Regular | Followup to DeadEight: #01084239



I agree. American political system could use some change.
There used to be a American Communist Party, but leader of
that party was sent to jail in 1948...

Of course i wouldn't vote for a fucking commie, but anyway
change would do good.



 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-02-22 10:42 [#01084245]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



everything that Nader says about the two parties is
correct... but it'll probably take at least another 8 years
worth of hardship before americans come around to the extent
that someone like nader would even have a remote chance...


 

offline tlink from sofla (United States) on 2004-02-22 10:45 [#01084248]
Points: 403 Status: Regular | Followup to DeadEight: #01084245



It's not going to happen ever.
Those parties own this country and big corporations own
them. Well i hope that they increase chocolate rations ;)



 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2004-02-22 10:50 [#01084250]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular



in the end bush will win everyone over with his wit, charm
and intelligence


 

offline Xanatos from New York City (United States) on 2004-02-22 10:50 [#01084251]
Points: 3316 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Exactly. Anyone who tells Nader not to run doesn't believe
in democracy, they believe in a two party figurehead
oligarchy.

How sure are you all think Gore wouldn't have gone to war in
Iraq?


 

offline Torture Garden from Feelin' 2Pacish on 2004-02-22 11:07 [#01084266]
Points: 974 Status: Lurker



The American system definitely needs change, i study
politics over here and i know exactly what you guys are
saying. But i tell you something, we have it worse over
here. At least there is some kind of representation over
there, especially locally.
Tony Blair just doesn't give a fuck and if doesn't care then
government won't because they'll be forced to resign if they
go against the party lines.


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2004-02-22 13:49 [#01084450]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



Nader is too socialist to ever win. He would put so much
regulations on everything no one could stay in business. He
get what he wanted. Everyone would go to the government for
all their needs.


 

offline kochlear from aud-stim.com on 2004-02-22 14:02 [#01084468]
Points: 2311 Status: Addict | Followup to Xanatos: #01084251



what reason would gore have to go to war in iraq? he
doesn't get his intelligence from exxon.


 


Messageboard index