|
|
sadist
from the dark side of the moon on 2004-02-05 11:58 [#01060998]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker
|
|
i mean - now that mp3's of warp are official, they can't find out where you have them from right ?
now i can tell everybody, that i haven't downloaded my files from slsk, but bought them on bleep...
kinda stupid don't you think ?
|
|
tolstoyed
from the ocean on 2004-02-05 12:00 [#01061003]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator
|
|
hahhaha
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-02-05 12:03 [#01061006]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to sadist: #01060998 | Show recordbag
|
|
No, not stupid, "trusting". Warp never would prosecute people for having a few mp3s of their tracks. Smaller labels rely on goodwill of the fanbase (I know warp are a big indie label, but they're still small in the grand scheme of things) if they started sueing people left right and centre a la the RIAA, pretty soon there'd be no one left to buy their records.
I think it's very decent of them- the fact that they treat you with that level of trust and respect makes you less inclined to try to screw them over.
|
|
Intruder
from Chicago (United States) on 2004-02-05 12:06 [#01061010]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker
|
|
huh? i didnt get it.
|
|
mortsto-x
from Trondheim/Bodø (Norway) on 2004-02-05 12:08 [#01061011]
Points: 8062 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01061006
|
|
Agreed. Can you imagine that Warp would put any energy into hunting down people with illegal mp3's? Never.
|
|
evolume
from seattle (United States) on 2004-02-05 12:09 [#01061013]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular
|
|
anyway, RIAA is only prosecuting for sharing not for possesion. at least that was my understanding.
|
|
tolstoyed
from the ocean on 2004-02-05 12:10 [#01061014]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator
|
|
btw, big records companies have done the same thing.
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2004-02-05 12:10 [#01061015]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
|
|
kudos2warp4bleep
it's nice to see a record label embracing change instead of resisting it with everything they can.
|
|
horsefactory
from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2004-02-05 12:11 [#01061017]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular | Followup to tolstoyed: #01061014
|
|
Which big record companies have their entire back catalogue downloadable as mp3 at a fraction of the price?
|
|
tolstoyed
from the ocean on 2004-02-05 12:13 [#01061021]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to horsefactory: #01061017
|
|
ok, not entire catalogue but are selling mp3's...but it's the same thing regarding the initial question.
|
|
Intruder
from Chicago (United States) on 2004-02-05 12:13 [#01061022]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker
|
|
if you mean sharing mp3's that you just paid 1.35 for, thats STooPID! for some reason i find it worse to pay for mp3's, thn share them with a million people that didnt pay, then torip some tracks of a cd and share.
i dont know why i look at it like that. maybe cause i feel like with bleep, its like HEY FUCKER, GO spend a dollar and get it yourself. you dont actually have to leave your house, and spend the 15 bucks for that perticular record. thats the main thing for most people that D/L i think. conveience.
But when someone can go an pay a buck or two and D/L an mp3 just ike i did! i aint sharing that shit!
|
|
sadist
from the dark side of the moon on 2004-02-05 12:57 [#01061104]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker
|
|
good one ceri - but that's still a bit weird for me. i mean, when someone got internet, then i supose he'll donwload it for free. if he don't he will buy the cd.
another thing - when someone has the money to pay for the mp3's, i think he'll rather go to the shop and buy the original one with cover, artwork etc. my understanding.
|
|
sadist
from the dark side of the moon on 2004-02-05 13:29 [#01061163]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker
|
|
bump ??
|
|
roygbivcore
from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2004-02-05 13:32 [#01061166]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker
|
|
there's a quote from warp, something along the lines of "we don't treat our customers like criminals"
|
|
Intruder
from Chicago (United States) on 2004-02-05 13:35 [#01061170]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker
|
|
well, ive bought mp3's of bleep. i D/L off SLSK and i spend at least 100 dollars a week at the record store. so long as i get my music, i'll take it however i can get it. preferably "real" though.
|
|
danbrusca
from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2004-02-05 13:51 [#01061187]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #01061021
|
|
Which big record companies are selling mp3s?
|
|
danbrusca
from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2004-02-05 13:53 [#01061188]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to sadist: #01061104
|
|
If I want to buy whole releases it's cheaper to do so from Bleep and I don't really care about the artwork.
|
|
tolstoyed
from the ocean on 2004-02-05 16:51 [#01061417]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to danbrusca: #01061187
|
|
sony for instance?
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-02-05 17:01 [#01061429]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to danbrusca: #01061188 | Show recordbag
|
|
Yes, to be honest most of my CDs are only listened to as MP3s anyway. I only buy stuff to DJ with on vinyl really.
|
|
evolume
from seattle (United States) on 2004-02-05 17:17 [#01061446]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular
|
|
you can get free music by drinking Pepsi!
all your teeth will turn to sponges to the sounds of Shenaya Twain.
|
|
handoverthecart
on 2004-02-05 17:47 [#01061484]
Points: 2017 Status: Lurker
|
|
i suppose its a good idea, but personally i would never buy an mp3, cause basically it seems like you are paying money for nothing. i don't even download mp3s off slsk or anything very often (and if i do its usually hard-to-find stuff, or previewing an artist before i buy a cd), but paying for a digital file without getting a "hard copy" seems like throwing your money away to me. this also applies to software companies that sell programs online i guess. maybe it has to do with buying something that you could give away for free without any loss at all.. also i would rather get the cd with case and artwork for about the same price (which could be copied to a computer at "full-quality" rather than an mp3)
|
|
MrGerbik
from United States on 2004-02-05 18:16 [#01061511]
Points: 392 Status: Lurker
|
|
evolume is correct. There is nothing illegal about having mp3s on your HD... the problem is sharing them.
|
|
sadist
from the dark side of the moon on 2004-02-05 23:34 [#01061814]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to handoverthecart: #01061484
|
|
that's exactly what i thought about
|
|
Chri5py
from my Solarbear (United Kingdom) on 2004-02-06 01:30 [#01061863]
Points: 2903 Status: Lurker
|
|
Besides. You know that if you go to bleep you will find what you're looking for.
I've searched for things on slsk i can't find alot of the time... or shit quality.
It's nice that it gives people a choiceto do what they want. Choice is always good imo
|
|
danbrusca
from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2004-02-06 02:54 [#01061928]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #01061417
|
|
Interesting... where?
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-02-06 03:20 [#01061962]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to MrGerbik: #01061511 | Show recordbag
|
|
The law is not the same in all countries...
|
|
Messageboard index
|