|
|
aphextriplet
from your mothers bedroom (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-28 06:44 [#01051891]
Points: 4731 Status: Lurker
|
|
Have you ever noticed that more often than not, track 6 on an album is the best track? Weird
|
|
horsefactory
from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-28 06:53 [#01051900]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular
|
|
I think this is often the case with track 3
|
|
tolstoyed
from the ocean on 2004-01-28 06:58 [#01051911]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator
|
|
try some autechre albums.you will notice there isn't difference in quality among tracks.
|
|
horsefactory
from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-28 07:09 [#01051923]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular | Followup to tolstoyed: #01051911
|
|
very true
|
|
virginpusher
from County Clare on 2004-01-28 12:37 [#01052326]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker
|
|
3 and 6. This is true but the odd thing
is 3+3=6 and 6-3=3
what an odd coinsidence!! o_O
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2004-01-28 12:40 [#01052330]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
2<1 => 2+2=3
where 2<1 is true then 2+2=3 is also true.
|
|
uzim
on 2004-01-28 12:55 [#01052350]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker
|
|
uh? what? track 0 is the best.
it's probably all in your heads i guess something must attract you to numbers 3 or 6... that, or/plus some coincidences...
|
|
Messageboard index
|