Bush wants Moon Station & Mars Mission | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
recycle
...and 554 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Bush wants Moon Station & Mars Mission
 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2004-01-09 13:38 [#01025300]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



"Earth should be priority, not mars."

As much as I want to see the colonization of other planets
occur within my lifetime, I feel that this is completely
true.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-01-09 13:46 [#01025318]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



pantalaimon, what hte fuck are you talking about.

am i misreading you (probably) - how does the US account for
20% of the worlds population!?!?!

and what about china? they have taken measures to reduce
the UNGODLY amount of people they have, but now look at
them; communist country that feels like a prison, no?


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2004-01-09 14:01 [#01025336]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



serry


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-01-09 14:10 [#01025355]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



ceri


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-09 14:12 [#01025361]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #01025318 | Show recordbag



"am i misreading you (probably) - how does the US account
for
20% of the worlds population!?!?!"

yep, i said polution :)


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-09 14:13 [#01025364]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



it might help if i spelt it right :) Pollution


 

offline Peloton from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-09 14:16 [#01025369]
Points: 651 Status: Lurker



Not content with being the world's only superpower, the USA
wants to extend its military might to achieve what it so
bashfully calls "Full Spectrum Dominance", which will mean
backing up its dominance on earth by building up its weapons
in space.

Without the help of Darth Vader they're developing the
so-called "Star Wars" programme - a series of lasers that
will form a protective shield, to shoot missiles out of the
sky before they ever reach American soil. This is
accompanied by development of a "Nuclear Space Initiative",
which would see rockets powered by nuclear generators - this
is necessary to power long distance exploration into deepest
space and more significantly to provide the enormous power
needed to keep their mega laser battle stations orbiting
above the Earth.

Why is the US so hell-bent on developing a Star Wars
programme? Perhaps it has something to do with the people
behind Bush. People like Bruce Jackson, vice president of
Lockheed Martin, the largest weapons manufacturer and a
major contractor in US space military work who claimed "I
wrote the Republican Party's foreign policy platform." He
claims he hasn't pressed for development of Star Wars "That
would be an implicit conflict of interest with my day job."
So who did advocate it? Stephen Hadley, a military adviser
to Bush Snr, and is a lawyer who represents, er... Lockheed
Martin. He claims that "Space is going to be important. It
has a great feature in the military." And no doubt important
for swelling Lockheed Martin's bank balance and those
associated with it, like Lynn Cheney, the wife of US
vice-President Dick Cheney, who is a board member of...
Lockheed Martin.

Last November 160 Nations passed a United Nations resolution
called "Prevention Of An Arms Race In Outer Space", with
only the US, Israel and Micronesia abstaining. This
re-affirmed the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, international law
that sets aside outer space for peaceful uses.

The US Air Force Space Command in its Almanac 2000 stated
"The future of th


 

offline Peloton from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-09 14:18 [#01025376]
Points: 651 Status: Lurker



Bugger!

... The US Air Force Space Command in its Almanac 2000
stated "The future of the Air Force is spac... Globally
dominant ? The future Air Force will be better able to
monitor and shape world events."


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-09 14:21 [#01025382]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



"last November 160 Nations passed a United Nations
resolution
called "Prevention Of An Arms Race In Outer Space", with
only the US, Israel and Micronesia abstaining."

that doesn't suprise me in the slightest


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2004-01-09 14:25 [#01025387]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular



maybe we can use the moon as a big rubbish bin


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-01-09 14:31 [#01025400]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



Those goddamned filthy astronauts!


 

offline beer 4 brains from sheffield...the land of much c (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-09 14:49 [#01025441]
Points: 117 Status: Regular



micronesia rules!!!


 

offline X-tomatic from ze war room on 2004-01-09 14:56 [#01025453]
Points: 2901 Status: Lurker | Followup to Peloton: #01025376



"The US Air Force Space Command in its Almanac 2000
stated "The future of the Air Force is spac... Globally
dominant ? The future Air Force will be better able to
monitor and shape world events."

(8-0

And then tell me the conspiracy theorists are total nutbags.
Creepy stuff this. Especially since they're so in your face
with their NWO statements.


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-09 14:57 [#01025456]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to X-tomatic: #01025453 | Show recordbag



tell me about it, have you seen the New 'American' Century
document? Scary shit.


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-09 14:58 [#01025458]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



The Project for the New American Century is a non-profit
educational organization dedicated to a few fundamental
propositions: that American leadership is good both for
America and for the world; that such leadership requires
military strength, diplomatic energy and commitment to moral
principle; and that too few political leaders today are
making the case for global leadership.


 

offline X-tomatic from ze war room on 2004-01-09 15:02 [#01025473]
Points: 2901 Status: Lurker | Followup to pantalaimon: #01025456



Yep, seen it and detested it, what's more scary is that
there are even members on this board who are hailing all
this shit thinking it's the best for the world. I'm like
take your "freedom" and shove it up a smelly dank place were
the sun don't shine.


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-09 15:14 [#01025506]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to X-tomatic: #01025473 | Show recordbag



and the amount of money they spend on the military is a
joke!

United States $466.0 billion FY04 actual [see Note 8]
China $65 billion 2002 [see Note 1]
Russia $50 billion [see Note 6]
France $46.5 billion 2000
Japan $40.7 billion FY01
Germany $38.8 billion 2002
United Kingdom $31.7 billion 2002



 

offline corticalstim from Canada on 2004-01-09 15:18 [#01025516]
Points: 3885 Status: Regular



my friend owns 20 acres of space on the moon.

the guy who claims to own the moon actually does - he won it
in a court battle.


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2004-01-09 15:22 [#01025527]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to X-tomatic: #01025453



every country monitors and shapes world events
obviously, the more powerful the country the more shaping
they do, since every decision they make and action they take
effects more people


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-09 15:26 [#01025537]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to AMinal: #01025527 | Show recordbag



this sums up the US pefectly

"Superiority Complex"

and a dangerous one at that.

btw I have nothing against the US people, just its
government.


 

offline beer 4 brains from sheffield...the land of much c (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-09 15:34 [#01025563]
Points: 117 Status: Regular



i want to live on the moon:o)...imagine trying to make a pot
noodle :oS....ull need special space editions...*drools*


 

offline APeSHiTZ from ¤BANgbANG¤ on 2004-01-09 15:43 [#01025581]
Points: 641 Status: Addict



we need a world defense platform on our sattelite i do
believe.., hell as long as poletics never gets involved and
everyone amungst its crew (defense part of the crew that is)
is only there to protect the earth from cosmic whatever he
hell .. i think a moon base would be quite rewarding.


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2004-01-09 15:44 [#01025583]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker



According to a UN resolution, the moon cannot be owned by
any goverment or organisation, but some american bloke said
"I'm an individual, not a govt or org, so I shall own it,
and sell it for $10/acre"
Some idiots have even bought some moon!

There is no real military importance with the moon. Spy
satelites and satelite launched weapons platforms are
smaller, and can be moved. The moon moves, but not on
command, and does not cover 100% of the Earth's surface, but
a network of 12 satellites could easily, goldeneye
anyone???

As for Mars, please... has he been watching Total Recall too
much or something? What about perfecting the space shuttle,
or heaven forbid, scrap it and seek a real
solution.....perhaps a look at the Soyuz rocket, its old, it
works, its lo-tech, its reliable, it doesn't explode as
often as the shuttle (=missions/explosions).

NASA could do it, if it re-organised itself, pulled its
finger out, and was paid a few billion (trillion) dollars,
but why not sort out this planet first eh dubya?
Third world debt anyone???


 

offline X-tomatic from ze war room on 2004-01-09 16:24 [#01025693]
Points: 2901 Status: Lurker



"According to a UN resolution, the moon cannot be owned
by
any goverment or organisation, but some american bloke said
"I'm an individual, not a govt or org, so I shall own it,
and sell it for $10/acre"
Some idiots have even bought some moon!
"

but then, idiots tend to unlawfully overrule the U.N.
resolutions quite easily these days.


 

offline kochlear from aud-stim.com on 2004-01-09 16:37 [#01025716]
Points: 2311 Status: Addict



hello! this is 2004. we americans don't need stupid
international treaties telling us what to do.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-01-09 16:42 [#01025726]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



hey, I have a question about the star wars program...

if they want to use lasers that can shoot down a missle,
going several hundred miles an hour, in the air...

what could stop them from using it as a very precise sniper
type laser, targeting in, via satilite, anywhere in the
world?


 

offline acrid milk hall from United Kingdom on 2004-01-09 16:47 [#01025732]
Points: 2916 Status: Lurker



for a nation which waxes lyrical about democracy and unity,
the US seems to abstain from a lot of treaties drawn up by
the countries of the world to try to work together in a more
peaceful and environmentally sound way (the kind of treaties
that will ACTUALLY beneit people, rather than space
exploration, exciting though it may be).. instead they seem
content to set themselves up as a law unto themselves. free
to do whatever they see fit, at the expense of the rest of
the world.

and THATs how you get to be the world's only super power..

..by acting like a spoiled child. refusing to co-operate,
and forcing your actions on everybody else.
ladies and gentlemen, a toast.. to democracy.


 

offline acrid milk hall from United Kingdom on 2004-01-09 16:48 [#01025735]
Points: 2916 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #01025726



i like that question.

anybody have an answer?


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-01-10 01:14 [#01026209]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



theres no question marks in your previous post?

so i can't answer anything.


 

offline kochlear from aud-stim.com on 2004-01-10 01:52 [#01026226]
Points: 2311 Status: Addict



THE ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION IS TROUT.

i hope that helps.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-01-10 01:58 [#01026233]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #01026209



he was refering to my question.


 

offline eKLaB from Australia on 2004-01-10 02:47 [#01026280]
Points: 10 Status: Regular



Bush only wants a base on the moon so nobody can kill him
there while he monopolises the worlds oil.



 

offline acrid milk hall from United Kingdom on 2004-01-10 07:54 [#01026383]
Points: 2916 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #01026233



i was indeed.


 

offline Peloton from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-10 10:06 [#01026457]
Points: 651 Status: Lurker



The U.S. Space Command's "Vision for 2020" pulls no punches
about the intent or purpose of what the Pentagon is
developing: "Dominating the space dimension of military
operations to protect U.S. interests and investment."

**"... to protect U.S. interests and investment."**

The Airborne Laser (ABL) system, a "boost phase" component
of Theatre Missile Defence (TMD), is envisioned as a
high-altitude laser. Its technology dovetails with another
project approved last December by the Department of Defense:
the Space-Based Laser. **Both eventually will be able not
only to intercept missiles, but to attack fixed targets
anywhere.** A second space-based laser, the Alpha
High-Energy Laser, has already been tested succefully over
20 times.


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-10 10:29 [#01026486]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to dave_g: #01025583



Perfecting the space shuttle? Hardly...

The Shuttle will be dispensed with after the ISS is
complete, the cost savings being redirected to alternative
launch vehicles and the Moon missions.

While I'm sure Bush isn't aware of it, the establishment of
a moonbase and a subsequent manned mission to Mars are the
latest tiny steps in an epic journey lasting thousands of
years, the ultimate destination being mankind permamently
free of the Solar System and colonizing the universe.

Sooner or later humanity will need to leave earth,
permanently, and what we do now is the most basic groundwork
to make that possible, leaving a legacy of knowledge to pass
on to subsequent generations for them to build upon.


 


Messageboard index