 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 Now online (2)big recycle ...and 546 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2614087 Today 0 Topics 127542 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Unfortunately Tucows has not updated their download page. :-( Here's the of course you have to have installed for that to work... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
what's different about it? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
changes are listed |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
nothing big enough for me to upgrade yet im fine with my copy of 4.1(.2?) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Only 27Mb? Is that how big it is? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
ayup looks to be 27 megs. Cstim - improved rendering!!!1111one |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
im not really that concerned with "improved rendering" - im more concerned about making good music :P a shitty song is still going to be shitty even if it's rendered at the highest bitrate with the most improved rendering system ever. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
This is a demo!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
hahah - expected otherwise? fleetmouse even mentioned tucows in his original post - that would usually insinuate something legal |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Aw you're just all sour grapes cause there isn't a cracked regcode yet. :D |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Will a code at some point activate or convert this demo? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Ummm... that may be true... but shitty rendering can make a really good song sound bad. Unless the shitty bitrate style is what you are going for with your music. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Yeah, you can buy it online and they email you a password, then you download a .reg file which can be doubleclicked to add to your Windows registry. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i was actually talking in a pleasant tone (in my head anyways). im not sour grapes about anything - and yeah i did forget about the fact you could crack it later. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Oh I'm just teasing you big silly. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i see what you mean - but the rendering capabilities of my current version of floops is adequate - and i therefore wouldnt require a better one. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
:) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I have issues with the rendering of floops. And issues with the automation interface and lack of vst support in reason. I wish I could find a way to merge the two without using cubase. Floops for microprogramming Reason for rendering Floops for microprogramming Reason for rendering Floops for microprogramming Reason for rendering |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
why dont you use the new version of floops? i hear its got "improved rendering" ;) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I read an interesting post on this FL studio board where they recommended exporting from Floops in 32 bit format then rendering down to 16 bit in Wavelab using the Waves L2 dithering engine. Scroll down to the last post - frankly his EQing recommendation is baffling, and I don't think you really need the BBE maximiser if you're working with good source material (also it harshes things up), but the basic idea seems to work well. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
