Video games = art form? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
recycle
...and 566 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Video games = art form?
 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2003-12-30 09:52 [#01010259]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker



Many believe that video games could become the next
interpretive art form, next to traditional mediums of film,
art, animation, literature and theatre. Peter Molyneux
(creator of Populous, Black and White, The Movies and Fable,
amongst others) has been implying this quite a bit lately.

But seriously think about how video games are evolving on an
almost monthly basis. We have our masters - while art has
Rembrandt, Pollack, Warhol and others, gaming has Shinji
Mikami (Resident Evil), Hideo Kojima (Metal Gear Solid),
Koji Igareshi (Castlevania: SoTN), Shigeru Miyamoto (Mario,
Zelda, Pikmin) and Yugi Naga (Sonic, Phantasy Star Online)
amongst many others.

We have our genres - action/adventure, RPG, horror,
shooting, simulation, strategy, fighting, platformer, and
more.

And we even have our mediums for construction - aside from
the different systems, we have 2D, 3D, pre-rendered.... blah
blah blah.

And when you look at games like Grand Theft Auto: Vice City,
Legend of Zelda: Wind Waker, Viewtiful Joe, Resident Evil,
Halo, Final Fantasy X and Metal Gear Solid, the argument
that video games = an art form is more and more believable.

So - do you think it could happen? I personally say yes,
IMO. :D


 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2003-12-30 09:53 [#01010262]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker



and oh yeah, games these days require a crew equal of that
to some films for development.


 

offline WooferAttack from Milano (Italy) on 2003-12-30 09:54 [#01010263]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker



videogames are art, and miyamoto is the genius.


 

offline hyakusen from 8=============> on 2003-12-30 09:55 [#01010264]
Points: 7021 Status: Addict



what is strange to me is that japan is leading contry - just
look at these names - same japanese people...
...and yes , youre right , since youre ninja you can fight
like Snake from metal Girl Solid


 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2003-12-30 09:59 [#01010273]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker | Followup to hyakusen: #01010264



yes - strangely enough though, the first third-party
developer (a developer not loyal to any particular party)
ever was actually a group of hackers from California that
became ACTIVISION. :)

I don't think it was until the game market crashed here in
the early 80s (due to too many systems on the market) that
Japanese companies became more involved in the international
gaming scene as a whole.


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-12-30 10:12 [#01010286]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



you mean like mario paint?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-12-30 10:21 [#01010293]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Yes, they certainly are art in my opinion. I think they can
be compared to opera, which was originally concieved as a
"total" art- live music, singing, dance, acting, fine art
and scuplture (by merit of the way the original sets- todays
sets are pretty tame artistically in comparison) all in one
neat package. Films later came to be viewed in a similair
vein (most set designers would consider themselves artists)
and whilst some of the engaging with the audience was lost
through it not being done with real people in front of you,
this was made up for by the fact that the director had total
control over the viewing angle, sound, quality control, etc.


Videogames arguably go a step further again, as well as all
the facets of a film, they also contain an unparalleled
level of interactivity. Some would even argue that the
beauty of the code that makes up the game is a further layer
of "art"...

Even my father (whose background is primarily fine art and
only comparatively recently got into abstract works)
considers videogames "art" despite the fact he only plays a
few (Tetris, Worms and Puzzle Bobble).

Hyakusen: I agree that Japan does tend to lead the way in
"arty" games, certainly.


 

offline eric_hard_jams on 2003-12-30 10:22 [#01010295]
Points: 1986 Status: Addict



everything is art


 

offline Spacecadet on 2003-12-30 10:26 [#01010297]
Points: 1790 Status: Lurker



if video games are art, then the final fantasy games are
amazing masterpieces, as is vice city, and to an extent the
max payne games. there basically fully interactive movies


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-12-30 10:28 [#01010298]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



i like zelda


 

offline nanotech from Sukavasti Amitaba Pureland (United States) on 2003-12-30 10:29 [#01010299]
Points: 3727 Status: Regular



"Many believe that video games could become the next
interpretive art form, next to traditional mediums of film,

art, animation, literature and theatre. Peter Molyneux
(creator of Populous, Black and White, The Movies and Fable,

amongst others) has been implying this quite a bit lately."

Any layman can see that v-games are pinnacles of
multi-media. Even a few degree's higher; thery're
interactive!

i LOVE v-games...hopefully, one day i'll have some hand in
them.

np: blip, bleep: soundtracks to imaginary video games


 

offline uzim on 2003-12-30 10:29 [#01010300]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



the line between "art" and "not art" is quite blurry...
music is art, ok, but some kind of music is borderline
really: making crap music as a joke for example isn't really
art! - and as for drawing.... if i do drawings for example,
i wouldn't consider it art, they're nothing but drawings to
me... it's not a "binary" thing, "art" or "not art" with
nothing in-between, some things can be considered as art by
some people, not art by others, or "half art"....

handicrafts can also be considered as art, or as not art,
depending on your sensibility; i'd say there "half art".
the facts that the objects produced have a function,
and are produced to many exemplaries, make them less likely
to be recognized as art... video games is a bit the same...

(if you argue that each piece of handicrafts is different
because they're handmade, my reply is that ok, they're
made a little differently every time but in my
opinion they're only different when they're throught
differently if you see what i mean, when each piece has its
"soul" if you want. yes, some handicraftsmen do it this
way.)

games like Rez, for example, are quite art to me...
but most of the time i wouldn't say it is "art", more like
"half art".

roybivcore > off-topic!! ; )


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-12-30 10:33 [#01010301]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



well i thought it was clever


 

offline Clic on 2003-12-30 10:44 [#01010305]
Points: 5232 Status: Regular



With games like ICO, yeah.


 

offline Archrival on 2003-12-30 10:45 [#01010308]
Points: 4265 Status: Lurker



Yeah video games is art and porn is also art.


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-12-30 10:46 [#01010309]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



i love titties


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2003-12-30 11:35 [#01010390]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



an art form that creates the illusion of being and doing for
the sole purpose of entertainment and total ego absorption?

if a masturbation machine is sculpture, then video games are
art.

can't argue with the titties part, though.


 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2003-12-30 17:05 [#01010784]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker



games like vib ribbon and rez are like art to me,

most decent videogames conatina "art" so I'd say yes!

I consider guilty gear x to be very artistic!


Attached picture

 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2003-12-30 17:06 [#01010789]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker



I tihnk art has to be aesthetic to be calssified as such,


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2003-12-30 17:29 [#01010851]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular



You have to interact with computer/videogames to experience
them . In fact, the interaction is the experience
(physically and mentally, while you only interact mentally
with art like movies, books, music etc)...

This also limits the videogames to be experienced [the way
it's meant to be] only by the person playing.
For the people watching the person playing it is sortof like
watching someone do sports - they are interacting and you
don't know how it's going to end.
And just think about the word "game" - it is a game. Like
sport is a game.

In a way it's like;
If one interacts physically with "art" - one helps creating
it, and that's why perhaps it cannot be called art (though
perhaps "interactive art").


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2003-12-30 17:32 [#01010868]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Absolutely, it's an art form. A strange one though. It takes
SO many people to make a great video game. It kind of takes
away from the... personalization of it, or something. It's
not like one guy can express himself through a video game
like he can a song. Guys like Kojima and Miyamoto and
everyone are really a very small piece of a massive puzzle.

They're amazing things, though. So much to experience in
them. The best video game music stands up to any music,
period. The art direction, the stories, the actual
gameplay... covers all the aesthetic bases. And video games
are getting better. I'll always be a classic gamer, but
video games have come a lot further than, say, music,
they're very technologically dependent. If you know what I
mean. I hope you do, cuz I don't.

There's a lot of awful games, but that goes for every art
form.


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2003-12-30 17:32 [#01010871]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to Key_Secret: #01010851



I mean one does not, currently, consider the physical
experience when it comes to art - only the psychical/mental,
except for (maybe) when it comes to interactive art at
exhibitions...

the much more interesting



 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2003-12-30 17:40 [#01010904]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ophecks: #01010868



usually the main idea is that of one persons and it everyone
else just helping to create that image,.. so I do think
there is a lot of personal quality ot them,

kind of like a band


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2003-12-30 17:41 [#01010910]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to Ophecks: #01010868



Well in a way it's a form of art; I mean they include
different "art" in their game, like music, pictures, motion
pictures, texts, etc - it's just that one has to interact
with it to experience it.

I mean for RPGs and such with great stories and puzzles and
music and graphics, and stuff - that's the most close to art
(among games) I think.

But I think in a way, videogames are not art, but a
container for different arttypes. It's like media player for
all kinds of media, but that you also take pleasure in using
the software that is used to access the art.


 

offline hyakusen from 8=============> on 2003-12-30 17:42 [#01010915]
Points: 7021 Status: Addict



I am the absolutely piece of art, every single part of my
great body is perfect
you are just jelaous


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2003-12-30 17:48 [#01010942]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular



Another fun question is:
can software really be art?

cause if software can be art--art just like any other
art--it can not just be limited to computergames.
Instead; all software must be looked upon as more/less
artistic art (good or bad).

To me, software is a container for art. Sometimes it's there
already (like an interactive computergame, or you watch a
movie through a mediaplayer) and sometimes you create it
yourself from scratch (e.g. writing a novel in notepad, or
making gfx in some gfxprogram).


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-12-31 00:03 [#01011406]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



video games (esp. after the industry's most profitable year,
2003) are going to be one of the ent. industry's strongholds
in the future.. like music, movies, tv shows, stage, video
games (not just games in the future perhaps?)


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2003-12-31 00:37 [#01011417]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



"To me, software is a container for art. Sometimes it's
there already (like an interactive computergame, or you
watch a movie through a mediaplayer) and sometimes you
create it yourself from scratch (e.g. writing a novel in
notepad, or making gfx in some gfxprogram)."

Yeah, I feel the same way.

"Guys like Kojima and Miyamoto and
everyone are really a very small piece of a massive
puzzle."

Yeah, these guys always get all the credit but behind the
scenes, there is SO much more going on!


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2003-12-31 00:38 [#01011419]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Oh, and I share the opinion that some games are art, and
others are not. Can shoddily put together budget PC titles
be considered art? well, yes! Getting them to even run
without crashing is an art form.


 

offline D-Steak from Kansas City, Mo. (United States) on 2003-12-31 01:07 [#01011443]
Points: 1376 Status: Regular



MK Fatalities is an art form


 

offline Chri5py from my Solarbear (United Kingdom) on 2003-12-31 01:53 [#01011462]
Points: 2903 Status: Lurker



Video games as a subject isn't art. It's a full blown
pop-music like business now.

I'd consider a few games to be art but the rest are all to
make money.


 

offline MachineofGod from the land of halo's (United States) on 2003-12-31 10:33 [#01011901]
Points: 3088 Status: Lurker



i agree with chri5py on that on. there definately are the
games that are catered simply to make money where there is
less\no emphasis on making an art style\trying to making
something interesting. there are still games like
pikmin\ico\metroid prime that definately fit the term 'art.'


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2003-12-31 11:05 [#01011912]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01010293



of course, video games are art. they are very similar to
movies in that they are a colaborative art form. the medium
is just different: interactive code instead of film.

As computer graphics become more accurate and sophisticated,
i think the line between film and videogames will begin to
lose definition but i also believe both will continue to
exist in their pure forms.

I think it is interesting to ask, what artforms are
beginning to die out?

It's interesting that Ceri mentioned Opera as being similar
to videogames as a "total" art form. It's on the way out as
videogames are still growing in popularity.


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2003-12-31 11:06 [#01011914]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



Vice city is like an interactive Scarface


 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2004-01-03 15:22 [#01015936]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker



wow - i didn't think this would cause such a great
discussion. i do have to agree that chri5py makes a good
point - the videogame industry is a very commercialized
scene now.


 


Messageboard index