Rolling Stone magazine and the beatles | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
recycle
...and 227 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614354
Today 75
Topics 127559
  
 
Messageboard index
Rolling Stone magazine and the beatles
 

The_Funkmaster from Newfoundland, Canada on 2001-12-01 03:40 [#00057258]



I don't have much else to do, so I was looking on the
Rolling Stone website about the beatles... they rated just
about every real beatles album 5 stars... now really,
they're good, and obviously they one or two, or even three
maybe deserve that, but it makes you wonder in they give all
of them 5 stars if they actually think that of the album, or
if they are simply praising them because after all, they are
the beatles... Bah, Rolling Stone magazine sucks ass...


 

boxrocket on 2001-12-01 04:20 [#00057265]



i lost all respect for rolling stone the day i saw puff
daddy on the cover. fuck that mag.


 

The soul of George Harrison on 2001-12-01 17:19 [#00057341]



The Beatles invented the FLANGER effect and other weird
AUDIO EDITING technics.....like the one with the BOTTLE on
the Piano....


 

1010-1111-10 from St.JOnn\\\\\\\\\'s Newfoundland, Canada on 2001-12-01 17:22 [#00057342]



I'm sure if the beatles put mics up their asses and farted
for 45 min and released it on cd, rolling stone would blow
each other off and write an 8 page review praising every
second of it. I hate it when people like music just because
its released by a specific group.

I myself am not afraid to say that some of aphex's music
sucks ass, but the good outweighs the bad (by alot).


 

Ophecks from Nova Scotia on 2001-12-01 19:39 [#00057351]



I'm sure John Lennon has more talent in his pubic hair then
anyone else has in their entire bodies.


 

The_Funkmaster from Newfoundland, Canada on 2001-12-01 21:12 [#00057369]



yeah I agree 1010-1111-10... some of Aphexs music sucks ass,
as does some of the Beatles music... and even though I love
Aphex Twin, and think he is one of the best artists around,
I can say "Yeah, that song sucks" and stuff... to impress me
anyways, it's the music that counts, not the band...
although I'll buy everything (or try to anyways) that Aphex
Twin releases, if it sucks, it sucks...


 

REPHLEX~ology from UK on 2001-12-01 22:59 [#00057402]



I love the way they say "made some of the best electronic
music ever" and give all the albums like 2 stars.

Hmmmm.... odd.


 

The_Funkmaster from Newfoundland, Canada on 2001-12-01 23:13 [#00057404]



yeah, I don't get critics, especially the ones from Rolling
Stone... they critisize Lenny Kravitz because he sounds too
retro, and then they praise a band like The Strokes and
compare them to the Velvet Underground saying they have
saved rock and roll...


 

Bogus on 2001-12-02 04:11 [#00057463]



don't worry onlw 2 beatles left.. whon those die too..
there'lll be no reson to remember them


 

Ophecks from Nova Scotia on 2001-12-02 07:49 [#00057478]



The VU is underrated.

I hope bogus is raped by angry seals.


 

Korben Dallas from _ on 2001-12-02 11:01 [#00057499]



Seems tho that the Funkmaster was thinking Kenny was
underrated - no? :)


 

Korben Dallas from _ on 2001-12-02 11:07 [#00057501]



Kenny = Lenny K



 

The_Funkmaster from Newfoundland, Canada on 2001-12-02 13:57 [#00057517]



well, Are You Gonna Go My Way is a pretty sweet song... no
I'm not a huge fan, and he's pretty shitty now in my
opinion, but he had some ok songs... I'm just saying that
really, both Lenny Kravitz, and The Strokes are pretty retro
in their music, and Rolling Stone condemns Lenny for it, and
praises The Strokes... it's stupid...


 

offline corngrower from the fertile grounds of Iowa, w (United States) on 2003-01-26 02:56 [#00528623]
Points: 4404 Status: Lurker | Followup to The_Funkmaster: #00057517



I like the Strokes


 


Messageboard index