|
|
theo himself
from +- on 2003-11-19 08:33 [#00956994]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular
|
|
no. a stupid, easily-manipulated pawn. the neo-con agenda-pushers are the evil ones.
|
|
MachineofGod
from the land of halo's (United States) on 2003-11-19 09:31 [#00957044]
Points: 3088 Status: Lurker
|
|
thats good to hear but bush will probably do something about it.
its all the neocons faults anyways just like theo said. theyre completely insane.
|
|
kochlear
from aud-stim.com on 2003-11-19 10:25 [#00957095]
Points: 2311 Status: Addict
|
|
i'm a pacifist so i'm not really gonna take a stand until bush passes the "wes is not allowed to sit in that chair all day playing xbox" bill.
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2003-11-19 10:36 [#00957121]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
For once I agree with Bush...gays are gonna do what they do, but they shouldn't be allowed to marry...a unity between a man and a woman, a productive union which, god willing, creates the next generation of the human race.
|
|
theo himself
from +- on 2003-11-19 10:44 [#00957136]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular
|
|
marraige is bullshit.. it's failing at an increasing rate because the whole thing is an unnatural sharade of suppression.. gays are the only people that WANT to get married nowadayz .. so why stop them.. marraige doesn't mean a goddamn thing.. save for the legal and tax-status changes. that's it.
|
|
Zephyr Twin
from ΔΔΔ on 2003-11-19 11:01 [#00957160]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
"marraige is bullshit.. it's failing at an increasing rate because the whole thing is an unnatural sharade of suppression.."
I agree.
|
|
zaphod
from the metaverse on 2003-11-19 11:07 [#00957168]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict
|
|
i'm surprised this is still an issue at all. really, who cares if two men, or two women, marry? apparently close minded conservatives can't leave other people well enough alone.
|
|
evolume
from seattle (United States) on 2003-11-19 11:29 [#00957189]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to REFLEX: #00956252
|
|
that is total bull shit.
the arguement that homosexuals should not be allowed to adopt because children need a mother and a father is a direct insult to the millions of children raised by single parents. children that often grow up to be well adjusted and successful adults.
|
|
evolume
from seattle (United States) on 2003-11-19 11:32 [#00957190]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to ecnadniarb: #00957121
|
|
that is a bull shit arguement as well. many heterosexual couples get married and never have children or, in the case of my aunt and uncle, are not able to have children. if marraige is about a union between two individuals with the intent to procreate, then heterosexuals who cannot or will not have children should also not be allowed to marry.
|
|
evolume
from seattle (United States) on 2003-11-19 11:41 [#00957195]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to BlatantEcho: #00956345
|
|
indeed, i agree with blatant echo. the sanctity of marraige will not be sullied by homosexuals. Rather, heterosexuals have already tarnished the purity of this union with frivolous marraiges ending in divorce.
if you want to blame somebody for the loss of sanctity of marraige, blame the gold-digging bitches, blame alcohol, blame divorce lawyers, blame infidelity. these things were around long before homosexuals started asking for equal civil rights.
|
|
drummond
from coffee, ahh, a burger, ahh on 2003-11-19 11:43 [#00957199]
Points: 1021 Status: Addict
|
|
this isnt a question of marriage its a question of equality
|
|
big
from lsg on 2003-11-19 12:43 [#00957268]
Points: 23728 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #00956947 | Show recordbag
|
|
that was an allusion on austin powers i hope i didnt ruin my funny now
|
|
Ganymede
from Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius on 2003-11-19 12:50 [#00957273]
Points: 1045 Status: Lurker | Followup to mappatazee: #00956574
|
|
I was referring to people demonstrating against George Bush.
|
|
k_maty
on 2003-11-19 14:24 [#00957380]
Points: 2362 Status: Regular
|
|
i can't believe a man who is attracted to a man (or woman+woman) doesn't have the same rights as everyone else. This is year 2003. For fucks sake, aren't there larger issues that need to be tackled? Supressing someone's sexual desires is so primitive. I fucking hate shit like this. Why don't they just make having a foot fetish illegal?
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-11-19 14:27 [#00957387]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker
|
|
well i'm not gay, so i'm not going to crrack open the champagne yet.
|
|
D-Steak
from Kansas City, Mo. (United States) on 2003-11-19 14:28 [#00957388]
Points: 1376 Status: Regular
|
|
that weinerschnitzel/taco bell thing was beautiful oddio.
|
|
kochlear
from aud-stim.com on 2003-11-19 14:58 [#00957434]
Points: 2311 Status: Addict
|
|
so now they canwatch "queer eye on the straight guy" every night together AND get tax benefits?
|
|
mimi
on 2003-11-19 16:53 [#00957606]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular | Followup to REFLEX: #00956252
|
|
maybe you should think about what it really means to be motherly or fatherly because you just might realize it doesnt have as much to do with gender as you think.
|
|
evolume
from seattle (United States) on 2003-11-19 16:57 [#00957614]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to mimi: #00957606
|
|
true that, my dad is a total homo.
haha just kidding.
|
|
REFLEX
from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2003-11-19 17:38 [#00957641]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular
|
|
mimi: id think your wrong, because it does matter, its not how the kid precieves it , its how its really being done, i doubt 2 dads are going to split and ones really going to take the mother side, I highly doubt that.
|
|
evolume
from seattle (United States) on 2003-11-19 18:00 [#00957656]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to REFLEX: #00957641
|
|
so what are you saying? that a queer couple is incapable of, for example, teaching an adopted child to play football and to sew? How do you define fatherly and motherly roles and what would be the result of a lack of one or the other? Don't you think a child raised by a gay couple might actually have more parental guidence than a child raised by a single parent? by your logic, single parents should not be allowed to raise children.
|
|
kochlear
from aud-stim.com on 2003-11-19 18:57 [#00957718]
Points: 2311 Status: Addict | Followup to evolume: #00957656
|
|
he's just saying it's gonna hurt breastfeeding the kid.
|
|
evolume
from seattle (United States) on 2003-11-19 19:07 [#00957726]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to kochlear: #00957718
|
|
lol
this is true.. hmm yes.. good call
|
|
TRB
from United States on 2003-11-20 13:40 [#00958699]
Points: 50 Status: Regular
|
|
the xltronic member Cutfucker is very pleased about this!
|
|
TRB
from United States on 2003-11-20 13:41 [#00958701]
Points: 50 Status: Regular
|
|
the xltronic member Cutfucker is very pleased about this!
|
|
Monoid
from one source all things depend on 2003-11-20 13:46 [#00958711]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker
|
|
The world would be a better place if everyone was gay
|
|
evolume
from seattle (United States) on 2003-11-20 13:50 [#00958721]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to Monoid: #00958711
|
|
even better if everyone was dead.
|
|
Messageboard index
|