when did the twentieth century start? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
w M w
...and 211 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614114
Today 11
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
when did the twentieth century start?
 

offline elsemissing from chicago on 2003-10-26 16:24 [#00919431]
Points: 192 Status: Lurker



i'd say in 1871 with the unification of Germany.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-10-26 16:25 [#00919433]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



call me crazy... but 1901 is my guess.


 

offline elsemissing from chicago on 2003-10-26 16:26 [#00919434]
Points: 192 Status: Lurker



so it's that simple.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-10-26 16:26 [#00919436]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



glad I could help


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2003-10-26 16:26 [#00919437]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



1919


 

offline elsemissing from chicago on 2003-10-26 16:27 [#00919438]
Points: 192 Status: Lurker



why 1919?


 

offline elsemissing from chicago on 2003-10-26 16:28 [#00919439]
Points: 192 Status: Lurker



versailles?


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-10-26 16:31 [#00919443]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



the 20th century can only be from 1901-2000

because, where using a number based system. Therefor, the
years that comprise the 20th century, can only be the years
that actually take place in the 20th century.

Now, if you want to go into different names (ie. Renissance
or some similiar term) then ok, because its not a numerical
based system of definition, and can start at any point in
time. But the 20th century is specific recorded dates


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-10-26 16:32 [#00919444]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



uh... 1901?

maybe I don't understand the question...


 

offline elsemissing from chicago on 2003-10-26 16:37 [#00919450]
Points: 192 Status: Lurker



one can't consider the twentieth century outside of numbers?
as in a "twentieth century way of thinking" or a "twentieth
century idea" this is just semantics. i mean take wwI and
II these pretty much define the first half of the 2oth c.
but what started it all? and again, i say the unification
of Germany in 1871.


 

offline GIR from Easton on 2003-10-26 16:38 [#00919455]
Points: 828 Status: Addict



the rise of nationalism(Germany, Italy, Austria-Hungary)

Id modern politics started with Metternich's council and the
"balance of power", while at the same make weaker third
world countries weak, and dispute over boundaries, therefore
keeping the original states in control over the world.


 

offline scup_bucket from bloated exploding piss pockets on 2003-10-26 16:39 [#00919456]
Points: 4540 Status: Regular



bah...you're right.

in other news, who cares?


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-10-26 16:40 [#00919459]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker | Followup to elsemissing: #00919450



the only reason you are using the term 20th century is
because historians havnt come up with a term for the time
period.

No one called the Renissance "The Renissance" when they
where living in it.

Historians called it that later.



 

offline elsemissing from chicago on 2003-10-26 16:43 [#00919465]
Points: 192 Status: Lurker



i'm glad you relaize that, so we should agree that whenever
the period we are talking about began is debable. when woud
you say it began?


 

offline elsemissing from chicago on 2003-10-26 16:44 [#00919466]
Points: 192 Status: Lurker



debatable


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-10-26 16:45 [#00919469]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



id probably say, the start of WWI

but then again, im no historian


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2003-10-26 16:45 [#00919470]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



well actually they have come up with terms... the Modern and
Post-Modern ages... and while those terms aren't entirely
faulty... there is a peculiar unity between them the hasn't
been fully iterated yet... i say 1919... because the
aftermath of world war I left a world full of people whose
conceptions of humanity had been completely destroyed...


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-10-26 16:47 [#00919475]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



modern and post modern are terms that will change

i mean, people living in 2058 will call their music
modern... not post post post post post post post post post
modern



 

offline elsemissing from chicago on 2003-10-26 16:47 [#00919477]
Points: 192 Status: Lurker



yeah but the aftermath was just that an "aftermath," a
result. The cause could be 1871,no?


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-10-26 16:50 [#00919484]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



or you could just call 1871 a precursor, or transitional
period


 

offline eXXailon from purgatory on 2003-10-26 17:00 [#00919493]
Points: 6745 Status: Lurker



the twentieth century will start in the year 3985.

we've started counting since I was born in 1984. read the
neo-bible


 

offline pachi from yo momma (United States) on 2003-10-26 17:00 [#00919494]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker



1901


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2003-10-26 17:02 [#00919495]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



well if you're thinking that way... why don't you just cite
the big bang as the beginning of the 20th century? obviously
it couldn't have happened without it...
i reject the idea that the world in 1871 bore any
resemblance to the one we found in 1919...

as for the modern-post-modern tangent: it's hard to gauge
whether or not the term will become elastic and refer to
anything new, in light of the fact that we've only lived
within the context of the modern world... i'd say that if
people in 2058 call there music modern, then they've been
lazy about labeling these things... one of the main reasons
why we're still calling new things modern is that popular
culture is completely divorced from many many of the ideas
being forwarded by the intellectual sphere of our society...
if this continues... than i suppose they may as well keep
the term modern... but i think people are slowly starting to
understand these things


 

offline elsemissing from chicago on 2003-10-26 17:06 [#00919500]
Points: 192 Status: Lurker



i see your point. so for you the end of wwI began an era
distinct from all else. makes sense... the war was the
first modern war and the effects were obviously
astronomical. therefore the new period began because the
after effects of the war started or stopped ways of
thinking.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-10-26 17:08 [#00919501]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



yeah, and I think its also when people began to realise that
the world is much smaller... what happened in germany was
effecting people in the US and etc...

(yeah, i mean, obviously... WORLD war)

but yeah...


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-10-26 17:09 [#00919502]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



oh, and there will most definately be a 3rd world war


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-10-26 17:10 [#00919503]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to Zeus: #00919502



what do you mean? dont say that


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-10-26 17:13 [#00919507]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



sorry... but I beleive it firmly



 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2003-10-26 17:22 [#00919524]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



it has to happen... and i think it will wipe out humanity as
we understand it... it's a question of sooner or later...


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-10-26 17:24 [#00919530]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



yeah... but just because there will be a 3rd world war...
doesnt mean it HAS to wipe us out

i think that is inevitable... but I think it could possibly
be avoided alittle longer...

maybe like world war 4 or 5 or something



 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-10-26 17:29 [#00919537]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



you think this guy could be responsible for it?


Attached picture

 


Messageboard index