Define Talent... | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
DADONCK
w M w
...and 210 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614114
Today 11
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Define Talent...
 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-10-26 02:45 [#00918631]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker



What makes someone talented/gifted musically? Does it
matter if you don't write your own music, but have a good
singing voice...etc.etc?

Lots of people here seem to 'diss' non-IDM artists, but
surely just because individuals do not like their material,
does that make them any less talented?

Discuss..


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2003-10-26 02:47 [#00918632]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker



fuck talent!


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-10-26 02:47 [#00918633]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to princo: #00918632



Well you are Australian! :P


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-10-26 02:49 [#00918635]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I would define "talent" as the skills/abilities you are born
with a natural apptitude for/develop in your early child
childhood... having a great sense of pitch or rhythm is a
talent, having a "head for figures" is also a talent. I
think almost without exception, these skills must be honed
with a lot of hard work, but having a natural talent for
them makes it a lot easier for you to excel in that area
than someone who doesn't have the same intuitive grasp as
you.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-10-26 02:50 [#00918636]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



Well Billy Corgan didn't have a good singing voice, but he
was a talented vocalist. I'm not sure how it works, but it
does.


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2003-10-26 02:50 [#00918637]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00918633



This comming from you?! heh..heh.. hehhh!


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-10-26 02:52 [#00918640]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to princo: #00918637



*snaps a certain transparent 12" vinyl over my knee*

hehehehhe!!


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2003-10-26 02:52 [#00918641]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00918640



NOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111

:'(


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-10-26 03:07 [#00918652]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Telent is that ability to do or produce something that other
people appreciate.


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-10-26 03:08 [#00918653]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #00918652



Thats a good answer. :)


 

offline eXXailon from purgatory on 2003-10-26 03:30 [#00918668]
Points: 6745 Status: Lurker



I agree with Ceri on this. People who can sing well often
can with help of singing lessons and/or music classes when
it's about playing an instrument. I don't regard something
you can learn a talent. I assume most of us can read and
write but is that a talent? Methinks not.


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-10-26 03:33 [#00918670]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to eXXailon: #00918668



Some don't need singing lessons though. That is, if its raw
talent. I don't lessons are responsible for 'raw' talent.
The talent has to be there to start with.


 

offline tragedy from Gloucester (United States) on 2003-10-26 03:36 [#00918675]
Points: 4423 Status: Lurker



um, in 2 words? aphex twin


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-10-26 03:37 [#00918678]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to tragedy: #00918675



Only from a certain point of view


 

offline eXXailon from purgatory on 2003-10-26 03:41 [#00918683]
Points: 6745 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00918670



Yes, to me singing talent would be the ability to sing great
w/o many lessons or even a single lesson. Talent is a skill
you are born with in which you excel.

Singers or musicians who have learnt how to sing/play their
instrument are not necessarily talented as it would be
something they have learnt.

Composing is a talent. It is IMO not something you can
learn. You can either compose great music or you can't. It's
something you must have 'feeling' for.


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-10-26 03:43 [#00918685]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to eXXailon: #00918683



I don't think people who can't sing can learn to sing good.
With an instrument I think anyone can with the necessary
time and effort.


 

offline eXXailon from purgatory on 2003-10-26 03:46 [#00918688]
Points: 6745 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00918685



Anyone can learn how to sing. For one person it might take
longer than the other. In the end it all comes down to
training, breathing techniques etc.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-10-26 03:47 [#00918691]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



And some people never do (Trent Reznor)


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-10-26 03:48 [#00918692]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to eXXailon: #00918688



So are you saying there is no skill involved?


 

offline eXXailon from purgatory on 2003-10-26 03:50 [#00918696]
Points: 6745 Status: Lurker | Followup to mappatazee: #00918691



I agree he's not a brilliant singer but in his case the
"rawness" of his voice does the music justice in terms of
expressing an emotion etc. (for diplomatic reasons I must
not forget to add 'IMO' :P)

Imagine Craig David singing 'Mr. Self Destruct' :\


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2003-10-26 03:51 [#00918700]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



simply put, it is being good at something and being able to
improvise. If you just play sheet music perfectly, but you
couldn't make music even if someone threatened to "kill your
moms" you aren't talented. It could be compared to
Chrouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon. A tiger knows the moves,
but cannot improvise or make new moves.. the tiger only does
katas. The dragon can improvise and make new moves.

Talent CAN be achieved through practice and it CAN be
something you're born with.


 

offline uzim on 2003-10-26 04:09 [#00918723]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



what? i like Trent Reznor's voice a lot... ' _ '
(you can criticize his lyrics' excessive eternal
teenageangstiness as much as you want though!)


 

offline uzim on 2003-10-26 04:11 [#00918726]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



and a talent is "a unit of money used in certain ancient
countries". =)

(or a "special or very great ability".)

(according to my dictionary.)


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-10-26 04:12 [#00918728]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



Heheh, I like NIN a lot, I just like to poke fun at him.


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-10-26 04:36 [#00918741]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker



The more I think about it, I think that a skill is something
you can learn, but a talent is something you are born with.


Therefore, singing well or painting great art is a talent,
and playing an instrument is a skill.

Thoughts?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-10-26 04:44 [#00918753]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00918741 | Show recordbag



But not anyone can become world class at an instrument...
some people have a truly awful sense of rhythm that no
amount of practice can cure. Sure, there'll be some slight
improvement if they stick at it, but some people will never
be in the top100 in the world at it.

There's a guy who lives near me who must of practiced the
drums for at least an hour (more often two) a day for the
past year and the improvement in his ability has been
miniscule. I've spent a grand total of about 2 hours on
drums in my life and I'm a far superior drummer to him. You
could say I am more "talented" than him...


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-10-26 04:46 [#00918758]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00918753



So would you agree, that to play a musical instrument well,
there has to be an unlying 'talent' to start with?


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-10-26 04:51 [#00918768]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Talent is an inate ability at something, however sometimes
it can take a lot of development for that talent to be fully
realised.

If you don't have a high degree of natural aptitude at
something then no matter how much you try you will never
reach a level of recognisable talent in the mojoritys eyes,
however as talent is related to artistry it is a highly
subjective matter. You can't quantify talent.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-10-26 04:52 [#00918769]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00918758 | Show recordbag



Yes- I think a certain amount is "just there" whether it is
due to genetics, your personality, influences based on how
you were brought up or whatever, there are certain parts of
a person's makeup that make them predisposed to skills in
certain things.

It extents to understanding too- some people can grasp
certain concepts far easier than others, to me, relational
database theory is so obvious that I find it hard to
see how even a layman couldn't grasp it. On the other hand I
found it very hard to "understand" certain aspects of
physics, no matter how hard I tried.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-10-26 04:52 [#00918770]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



majorities came out horribly wrong there :D


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-10-26 04:59 [#00918781]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to ecnadniarb: #00918770 | Show recordbag



Sounds like a track title to me-
"Mojo-rity"

Imagine Austin powers style electro funk :P


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-10-26 05:02 [#00918787]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



haha...if they use that title now I can sue them and you can
have 10% of the settlement for bringing the potential of the
word to my attention :P


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-10-26 05:11 [#00918805]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00918769



Based on that then, why do people unjustly 'slate' artists,
for arguments sake, from the charts.....when there is a
obviously some form of talent involved?

I've seen it here before, people calling certain artists
'talentless.....can't sing for shit.....' but they can.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-10-26 05:13 [#00918807]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



talent is somethign everyone has in varying degrees.

there is no bar to vault before oyu "have talent".

some are ok at guitar, some suck, some are excellent in
their own different ways.

but technical talent, ive found, is always second best to
ideas and inspiration.

take basquiat for example.


 

offline hyakusen from 8=============> on 2003-10-26 05:14 [#00918808]
Points: 7021 Status: Addict



talented guy
<------------


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-10-26 05:14 [#00918809]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00918805 | Show recordbag



I suppose because it's a less admirable talent to have a
naturally great singing voice, which only requires singing
lessons to hone it- it's a lot less work on their part
(which I suppose is what we really admire in
athletes/musicians/etc.) than say, a painter who has a
natural eye for beauty, but who must spend 10+ hours a day
practicing/working to produce his art.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-10-26 05:15 [#00918810]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



like basquiat.


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-10-26 05:15 [#00918811]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to tibbar: #00918807



Imagine you chose tomorrow, to play an instrument that you
had never tried before in your life, and you managed to play
it successfully and rather good after say 4 years.....is
that talent?


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-10-26 05:16 [#00918812]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



lots and lots of practice made him good...

look at his later stuff, MUCH better drawn. not quite as
shoddy or crude.

he became much more... hmmmm

detailed.


 

offline hyakusen from 8=============> on 2003-10-26 05:17 [#00918813]
Points: 7021 Status: Addict



everyone has some skills , so everyone is talented in some
way - its just that most of ppl dont realize this.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-10-26 05:17 [#00918814]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



yes, its a general knack for figuring the music out. so yes,
its a talent, albeit an non-specific one... which i find
also to be the best kind.

a general knack for art.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-10-26 05:17 [#00918815]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



hyakusen: exactly.


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-10-26 05:18 [#00918816]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to tibbar: #00918814



I think its a skill, not a talent


 

offline hyakusen from 8=============> on 2003-10-26 05:18 [#00918818]
Points: 7021 Status: Addict | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00918811



good painet is painting good picture in one day. Normal
person is doing the same , just not by one day but in 1
year. it is true - so who is not talented ?


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-10-26 05:18 [#00918819]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



so is there a difference?

skill comes from honing a talent.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-10-26 05:20 [#00918825]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



you see what im saying?

its kind of one comes with the other.

and time... it takes time.


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-10-26 05:23 [#00918829]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to tibbar: #00918825



I do understand what you are saying, but I don't think it
applies always


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-10-26 05:24 [#00918830]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



well, everyone has a ceiling with how far they can take
it... but potential is always there.

some dont have the drive or effort to really make it "real",
unfortunately.

i see what you mean, its an intriguing discussion.

i wish we could have different real life scenarios for a
discussion likethis.


 

offline hyakusen from 8=============> on 2003-10-26 05:25 [#00918831]
Points: 7021 Status: Addict | Followup to tibbar: #00918825



its all about time : talent is an ability to make something
faster than anyone ales , and, sometimes , a little better.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-10-26 05:25 [#00918835]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Imagine you have these two identical twins, Bill and Bob.
They both have pretty much identical genetics, upbringing,
life experiences etc. On the day of their 12th birthday they
both get identical guitars. They attend guitar lessons
together and after 6 months, Bill is far better than Bob at
the guitar. He is technically superior and his
imnprovisational skills are already well developed. I would
sy that Bill is more talented.


 


Messageboard index