The Music Industry | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 483 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614114
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
The Music Industry
 

offline Peloton from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-10-10 15:33 [#00897601]
Points: 651 Status: Lurker



"The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a
long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free and
good men (sic) die like dogs for no good reason... there's
also a negative side." -  Hunter S. Thompson

Spare a thought this week for the poor old music industry,
which seems to have spent most of its publicity budget this
year on advertising the fact that it cannot sell records.
Not only that, but apparently it's the punter who's at fault
for downloading stuff off the net for free and the artists
who are milking the record companies dry. Yeah, right. Andy
Taylor, head of Sanctuary, the only substantial independent
record label left in the UK, disagrees: "Sales of recorded
music account for a third of the whole market, which also
includes tours and merchandise as well as the use of music
in commercials and films."  He goes on to quote statistics
to show that global income from music increased by almost
10% in 2001.  Taylor argues that the music industry's
problems stem from the corporate takeover that took place in
the 1990s, when numerous small but healthy independent
labels were swallowed up by major label
budgets, squashing any long-term development of artists.
"The easiest thing to do was produce short-term products
that would give short-term growth," says Taylor. "It's
become like the Christmas toy market.?

In today's rhythmically globalised world, record production
and sales are controlled almost entirely by five fat cat
multinational companies intent on selling an
easy-for your-ears, empty-of-substance commodity. Why don't
we take a quick run through the hit parade of corporations
trying to monopolise our "entertainment": There's AOL Time
Warner (who own Atlantic, Elektra, Sire, Maverick among
others); Vivendi Universal (MCA, Polygram, Geffen,
Interscope, Motown); Sony (CBS, Epic); Bertelsmann (BMG,
Arista, RCA), and EMI (Capitol, Chrysalis,
Virgin, Parlophone). It's the new monsters of rock.

Vivendi Universal are about


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2003-10-10 15:35 [#00897604]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular



boo hoo


 

offline Peloton from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-10-10 15:37 [#00897607]
Points: 651 Status: Lurker



Vivendi Universal are about to merge with US TV network NBC,
who happen to be owned by General Electric - manufacturers
of engines for war planes used to bomb Afghanistan and Iraq,
and donors of $1.1 million to our much-loved Republican
Party.  Vivendi Universal also has links to Espelsa who
develop mission planning systems for arms manufacturers
Lockheed Martin and British Aerospace. And the latest is
that their music division isn't doing so well, so they might
soon be flogging it off to another corporation.  

Keeping it in the corporate family, AOL Time Warner are
currently negotiating with EMI to sell off Warner Music
(Madonna, Red Hot Chilli Peppers, Missy Elliot). And of
course, AOL is involved in the arms industry through Hughes
Electronic Corps and bombmakers, Raytheon Industries. AOL
and Time Warner, who together have donated $1.6 million to
the Bush administration, merged in 2000 to form the fourth
largest company in the world, generating more income than
the output of Russia or the Netherlands.  Meanwhile, Sony
is in joint venture with the US Army to develop advanced
training simulations equipment, and The Power Corporation of
Canada, a major shareholder in BMG, is involved in the
production of parts for fighter aircraft and other military
vehicles. So the arms business is the new rock'n'roll then.



 

offline uzim on 2003-10-10 15:38 [#00897609]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



exploding mushrooms!!!


 

offline Peloton from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-10-10 15:47 [#00897615]
Points: 651 Status: Lurker



In the corporate boardrooms music is another commodity and
the artists that create it are no more than a tool that they
can use to tap into difficult markets. Record contracts are
so watertight and royalties so low that it is only the
really big stars - and the record execs - who ever earn a
penny from record sales, so that's why the average musician
isn't that worried about piracy. The man behind such musical
greats as Steps, Pete Waterman (who once bought 18 Ferraris
in one day) said: "As Mark Twain said, 'Feed a starving dog
and it won't bite you.' That's the principal difference
between an artist and a dog."

Music only becomes valuable when it can be used to sell
other products. Mainstream success story David Gray says:
"It's staggering the amount of money you're offered, but
music is more important than selling mashed potatoes or a
dodgy jacket made in the Philippines." He chose to say no.
 Last year Chumbawumba were offered, and turned down,
$350,000 by General Electric to use their hit 'Tubthumping'
in an advert for air conditioning.  They explained "It's
not hard to dig up info on companies and sometimes it just
stares you in the face. When we were in New York in January
there was a huge NO SWEAT banner hanging from a building in
Times Square. In great big bold letters it urged shoppers
not to buy Gap because they use sweatshop labour. Are
Madonna and Missy Elliot dancing to Gap's tune because they
have no idea what conditions the jeans they are flogging are
made under? It's doubtful either of them would end up behind
a counter or pulling pints if they didn't make the
advertising revenue."



 

offline Peloton from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-10-10 15:50 [#00897618]
Points: 651 Status: Lurker



Other British acts, unable to get on radio playlists and so
denied performance royalties as a source of income, are
desperate to break into a hostile US market, and are less
conscientious. Badly Drawn Boy linked up with badly made
clothing company Gap, with his music featured on one of
their ads, while Coldplay (who told the world to "make trade
fair") sold off 'Yellow' to be used by ABC television. John
Harlow, a partner in the advertising agency Naked explains:
"The commercial brand world used to be quite a dirty word.
Artists in the old days would say, 'I don't want to be
involved with that.' But the dynamics have changed. Records
sales are right down. There is a new era of collaboration."


Likewise, when once a band could turn up at a gig and insist
the promoter take down the banner advertising a dodgy beer
company before they would go on stage, now they are booked
to play at the Carling Weekend in Reading and Leeds, or at
the Carling Academy in Liverpool, or the Carling Apollo in
Hammersmith. In the UK Carling, owned by US brewer Coors
(investors in GM barley; right wing anti-union, anti-gay
lobbyists...), are collaborating with corporate promoters
Mean Fiddler and Clear Channel to sponsor venues and
festivals to make the music industry profitable for them and
turn festivals into soulless landscapes and extensions of a
shopping trip. Pop has finally eaten itself and now it's in
the toilet with its fingers down its throat.

SchNews.org


 


Messageboard index