Trillian vs. Miranda | xltronic messageboard

�

You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in
Register

�

(nobody)
...and 318 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...

Members 8025
Messages 2614114
Today 0
Topics 127542

Messageboard index
Trillian vs. Miranda

Junktion from Northern Jutland (Denmark) on 2003-10-09 14:08 [#00896218]
Points: 9713 Status: Lurker

well...who will win?

Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2003-10-09 14:13 [#00896222]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker

I use miranda, it's great, except if the server for icq is
runnning slow, then it says a message has been undelivered
when it has

Junktion from Northern Jutland (Denmark) on 2003-10-09 14:15 [#00896225]
Points: 9713 Status: Lurker

I vote for Miranda

pros: you can download plugins so it works with almost every
messneger out there. Incl. ICQ, MSN, AOL, mIRC and more.
It takes almost no system resources.
It's adjustable to the smallest detail.

cons: has sometimes problems with file-transferring in MSN
and ICQ, and some problems with adding MSN-contacts. Rare
but it happens.

test it yourself:
Miranda IM vs. Trillian

Junktion from Northern Jutland (Denmark) on 2003-10-09 14:33 [#00896251]
Points: 9713 Status: Lurker

no comments people?

nlogax from oh, you must be the brains (Norway) on 2003-10-09 14:34 [#00896253]
Points: 4653 Status: Regular

I've tried both, and I don't like any of 'em. I stick to the
natural flavoured ones instead

Q4Z2X on 2003-10-09 14:35 [#00896254]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker

haven't they all stopped working with msn, or are about to
soon?

otherwise if they do find a way to continue working with
that service after msn does their "upgrade" then i will have
to switch to trillian..

Messageboard index