|
|
WooferAttack
from Milano (Italy) on 2003-09-17 00:31 [#00866419]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker
|
|
Which is the plaid album you like less between the followings:
1) Not for Threes 2) Rest Proof Clock 3) Double Figure
All other albums/compilation don't count for this poll.
\/\/.
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2003-09-17 00:38 [#00866429]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Why less? I suppose it would be Not For Three's if I had to choose at a push, but I really like all three.
|
|
WooferAttack
from Milano (Italy) on 2003-09-17 00:40 [#00866430]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker
|
|
honestly i haven't doubts... i think rest proof clock is the less brilliant album by plaid. double figure is awesome and not for threes is very good too.
|
|
IronLung
from the 91fwy in soCAL (United States) on 2003-09-17 00:44 [#00866434]
Points: 8032 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
I would choose Not 4 3's.....
Maybe I just havent given that album enough time, but I just dont remember it standing out as compared to the other 2.
|
|
Morton
from out (Netherlands, The) on 2003-09-17 01:13 [#00866463]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict | Followup to WooferAttack: #00866419
|
|
i can't choose, they're all brilliant
brilliant
|
|
JAroen
from the pineal gland on 2003-09-17 01:15 [#00866469]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular
|
|
double figure... never got into it really
|
|
eXXailon
from purgatory on 2003-09-17 02:07 [#00866539]
Points: 6745 Status: Lurker
|
|
rest proof clockwork for me
|
|
Aphexisatwin
from your mom's room (United States) on 2003-09-17 02:20 [#00866567]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular
|
|
love plaid can't choose
|
|
merg
from The New New York (Berlin) (Germany) on 2003-09-17 02:54 [#00866615]
Points: 1708 Status: Regular
|
|
The words "Plaid" and "worst" don't belong in the same sentence...
Apart from summat like "The day I missed seeing Plaid live was one of the worst ever"
|
|
Jarworski
from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2003-09-17 02:55 [#00866618]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker
|
|
Spokes, your restrictions don't count for this Jar.
|
|
nacmat
on 2003-09-17 02:56 [#00866622]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
|
I love plaid.
in fact they are one of my favs
and I find no problem in saying that among those three albums, "not for threes" is my less favourite
its brilliant compared to any other music, but I prefer the other two
|
|
merg
from The New New York (Berlin) (Germany) on 2003-09-17 03:02 [#00866633]
Points: 1708 Status: Regular | Followup to nacmat: #00866622
|
|
Exactly what he said
|
|
WooferAttack
from Milano (Italy) on 2003-09-17 06:37 [#00866901]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker
|
|
i find strange that most of you prefer rest proof clock respect not for threes.
probably i need a better listen of rest proof clock...
|
|
uzim
on 2003-09-17 07:02 [#00866940]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker
|
|
Geogaddi.
oops.
|
|
recycle
from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2003-09-17 07:16 [#00866977]
Points: 40066 Status: Lurker
|
|
not for threes, i love the rest of plaid
|
|
merg
from The New New York (Berlin) (Germany) on 2003-09-17 07:19 [#00866992]
Points: 1708 Status: Regular
|
|
Those of you who aren't too hot on NFT, lie in a darkened room and listen to Rakimou and Milh on loop...
:-)
|
|
qrter
from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2003-09-17 07:20 [#00867000]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator
|
|
All of the above.
|
|
WooferAttack
from Milano (Italy) on 2003-09-17 07:53 [#00867089]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker
|
|
rakimou is a masterpiece! first time who i listened this track i ran to my record shop to buy the cd.
|
|
merg
from The New New York (Berlin) (Germany) on 2003-09-17 07:59 [#00867098]
Points: 1708 Status: Regular | Followup to WooferAttack: #00867089
|
|
Amen to that mate
|
|
LeCoeur
from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2003-09-17 09:26 [#00867207]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker
|
|
Plaid doesn't HAVE a worst album......noooooooooooooooo
i've loved everything i heard from Plaid!
|
|
mc_303_beatz
from Glasgow, Scotland on 2003-09-17 09:31 [#00867209]
Points: 3386 Status: Regular
|
|
what a silly topic.
|
|
nacmat
on 2003-09-17 09:32 [#00867211]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to mc_303_beatz: #00867209
|
|
what a silly post
ups I did a silly post too
|
|
LeCoeur
from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2003-09-17 09:33 [#00867213]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #00867211
|
|
hey nacho!
received the article in ESPANOL, i plan on reading it later this afternoon!
gracias amigo =o)
|
|
nacmat
on 2003-09-17 09:36 [#00867219]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to LeCoeur: #00867213
|
|
if you want my opinion (the author´s opinion)
it is a bit to dense, not very entertaining
|
|
Messageboard index
|