|
|
Netlon Sentinel
from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2003-09-14 09:54 [#00862081]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker | Followup to promo: #00862071
|
|
this topic is now officially completely and utterly ridiculous :) even more so than after the first two posts which were quite stunningly idiotic :D
|
|
Zeus
from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-09-14 09:54 [#00862082]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker
|
|
hahaha
|
|
big
from lsg on 2003-09-14 09:58 [#00862087]
Points: 23754 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
promo i dont know wether there are better looking women that make better idm, i think that could be doubted
i stay with the argument that she looks genuine and other stuff to maybe attrackt women to idm and warp
warp must have had reasons besides the mere connection: they're pretty commercial
|
|
big
from lsg on 2003-09-14 09:59 [#00862091]
Points: 23754 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
hey topics have feelings too netlon!
|
|
promo
from United Kingdom on 2003-09-14 10:00 [#00862093]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict
|
|
Netlon Sentinel,
I know your posts were ridiculous. Why are you telling me this?
|
|
cuntychuck
from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2003-09-14 10:01 [#00862095]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker | Followup to promo: #00862071
|
|
thats probably in top10 of the most ridiculous things ever said on this mb... who the fuck are you to judge beauty?
|
|
promo
from United Kingdom on 2003-09-14 10:02 [#00862098]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict
|
|
big,
I never said that there were better looking women who made IDM. I said there were better looking women who were into Warp. Completely different thing.
|
|
Netlon Sentinel
from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2003-09-14 10:04 [#00862103]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker | Followup to promo: #00862093
|
|
you can't define beauty mr. it's different for everyone :) as i said, it's all in the eye of the beholder
|
|
Netlon Sentinel
from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2003-09-14 10:06 [#00862107]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker | Followup to promo: #00862093
|
|
or do you believe you can see whether ppl are criminals or not based on their facial features too? like they did 2 centuries ago?
|
|
promo
from United Kingdom on 2003-09-14 10:07 [#00862108]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict
|
|
cuntychuck,
Well Cunt believe it or not there is actually a scientifically defined method to recognise beauty. It is basically that all the facial features have a perfect sort of symetry and if they fit into that symetry then the person is beautiful. There is actually a facial framework that people can use and fit over a photo of someone's face and you can see how they fit into it.
|
|
promo
from United Kingdom on 2003-09-14 10:08 [#00862111]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict
|
|
Netlon Sentinel,
Yes you believe what you want. Lol. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, that really is classic tripe. Lol.
|
|
Netlon Sentinel
from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2003-09-14 10:11 [#00862115]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker | Followup to promo: #00862111
|
|
wow your sarcasm really bites :) at least the topic starter likes me
|
|
promo
from United Kingdom on 2003-09-14 10:12 [#00862118]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict
|
|
Oh come on Nelton lighten up.
|
|
Netlon Sentinel
from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2003-09-14 10:14 [#00862122]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker | Followup to promo: #00862118
|
|
yes let's hug :)
|
|
nacmat
on 2003-09-14 10:16 [#00862126]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to Netlon Sentinel: #00862115
|
|
I like you
I think this thread could have been better
|
|
big
from lsg on 2003-09-14 10:16 [#00862127]
Points: 23754 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
promo okay, but they're not postering thickness is in the eye of the beholder
|
|
big
from lsg on 2003-09-14 10:17 [#00862128]
Points: 23754 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
i'm doing the best i can nacmat
|
|
Netlon Sentinel
from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2003-09-14 10:21 [#00862132]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #00862126
|
|
i like you too
and i think this topic is as good as its title implies :)
|
|
Spacecadet
on 2003-09-14 10:29 [#00862145]
Points: 1790 Status: Lurker
|
|
hahaa your as bad as the 10 year old girls creaming over justin trousersnake in smash hits if you HONESTLEY even wanna start talking about if mira calix is 'hot or not'
|
|
fleetmouse
from Horny for Truth on 2003-09-14 10:44 [#00862173]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker
|
|
Well Cunt believe it or not there is actually a scientifically defined method to recognise beauty. It is basically that all the facial features have a perfect sort of symetry and if they fit into that symetry then the person
is beautiful. There is actually a facial framework that people can use and fit over a photo of someone's face and you can see how they fit into it.
That's similar to the formula you must follow to make good music. Otherwise it is shit.
|
|
nacmat
on 2003-09-14 10:48 [#00862181]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
|
lol I was talking just in general.
the thread tittle made me think of music discussion, but then it was just about a girl´s look
|
|
promo
from United Kingdom on 2003-09-14 10:52 [#00862188]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict
|
|
fleetmouse,
Better than you're crap I bet. Ha ha ha.
|
|
The_Funkmaster
from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-09-14 10:53 [#00862192]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker
|
|
beauty is in the eye of the beholder... it's as simple as that... I've heard of this symmetry thing, but I don't by it... just because your face is symettrical doesn't necessarily mean you're beautiful... what if you have warts, but they're symettrical to both sides of your face, and you have a huge nose, and are bald and such... beauty is in the eye of the beholder... simple as that... it ain't scientific...
|
|
promo
from United Kingdom on 2003-09-14 10:54 [#00862194]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict
|
|
Its scientific but your thoughts are sweet anyways. Lol.
|
|
Netlon Sentinel
from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2003-09-14 10:56 [#00862198]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker | Followup to promo: #00862188
|
|
one last try: tell me the laws you described (which i was aware of before you did) applied to the last two persons you fell in love with and i might give the theory another thought :)
|
|
promo
from United Kingdom on 2003-09-14 11:02 [#00862212]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict
|
|
Applies all the time for me.
|
|
xceque
on 2003-09-14 11:03 [#00862214]
Points: 5888 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
So, points raised in this "discussion" seem to be:-
Mira Calix is a woman. Some people think she is attractive. Some people feel she's only got recognition due to assocaition with Autechre and Warp.
Some people think she doesn't make good music. Some people think she is unattractive. Some people feel she's worthy in her own right. Some people think she makes good music.
So, after removing those points which have opposites, or which are subjective, we are left with:
She is a woman. She makes music. She looks like a woman. She's married to half of Autechre.
Thus I conclude: people will be either swayed by irrelevent factors or not, and it doesn't matter what you think of her, she's going to carry on without giving a rats fat snatch about you.
And good for her. I like her music and I'm not influenced either way by her looks. She is attractive, but it's irrelevent to the music. I'd be slightly disturbed, if I was her or her hubby, by the comments made here.
Nutters, the lot of you.*
*except the sensible ones
disclaimer: i am waiting for Enterprise to start so I'm rambling
|
|
promo
from United Kingdom on 2003-09-14 11:04 [#00862218]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict
|
|
xceque,
Thanks for that, NOT.
|
|
The_Funkmaster
from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-09-14 11:05 [#00862221]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker | Followup to promo: #00862194
|
|
but see, I totally disagree... you can't scientifically try and determine what beauty is because everyone has a different idea of that... and even the whole idea of symettry is suspect because one of the most beautiful girls in my class in school, her face isn't perfectly symettrical... so I don't buy it!
|
|
fleetmouse
from Horny for Truth on 2003-09-14 11:06 [#00862223]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker
|
|
Promo, what do you think is the origin or source of the standard concept of beauty?
Don't worry, I'm not winding up for some lefty rant on the psychological manipulation of corporate media - personally I think that certain traits are regarded as beautiful because they are 80% hardwired into our genes and brains and 20% determined by our culture. (yes I just made up those numbers but I'm trying to express my opinion here not formulate a doctoral dissertation)
What do you think?
|
|
Netlon Sentinel
from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2003-09-14 11:06 [#00862224]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker | Followup to promo: #00862212
|
|
once again, you baffle me. but i'm happy for you. do you make little notes, too, when you go out? and scratch potential symmetrical people?
;)
that's it for me
|
|
xceque
on 2003-09-14 11:07 [#00862225]
Points: 5888 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
Oh, and a generically 'attractive' face is one that isn't symmetrical.
|
|
big
from lsg on 2003-09-14 11:12 [#00862231]
Points: 23754 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
no: is symmetrical dumby
|
|
JAroen
from the pineal gland on 2003-09-14 11:15 [#00862240]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular | Followup to xceque: #00862214
|
|
hehe you've got a point there...
|
|
Netlon Sentinel
from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2003-09-14 11:16 [#00862245]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker
|
|
is it me or did we just collectively stumble upon the oldest quarrel in the universe?
:)
|
|
promo
from United Kingdom on 2003-09-14 11:16 [#00862247]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict
|
|
It is to do with the carrying of genes and the greater chance offspring have of surviving. Not sure it makes a lot of sense to me myself. But for instance the idea is that if you are attractive you have a better chance of having offspring so therefore furthering the human race. And it looks into human aspiration, science, technology and advancement. In order to impress an attrative mate you need to be someone who exceeds in a particular field, has power or is attractive etc etc. This all increasing the chance of the human race succeeding as a whole and motivates it and pushes it forward. Something along those lines. Its all sort of summed up in the Red Queen.
|
|
JAroen
from the pineal gland on 2003-09-14 11:18 [#00862250]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular | Followup to promo: #00862247
|
|
bla bla bla
|
|
big
from lsg on 2003-09-14 11:18 [#00862251]
Points: 23754 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
no that's the headache quarrel netlon
|
|
promo
from United Kingdom on 2003-09-14 11:19 [#00862252]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict
|
|
JAroen,
To you to prick.
|
|
Netlon Sentinel
from eDe (Netherlands, The) on 2003-09-14 11:19 [#00862254]
Points: 4736 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #00862251
|
|
:)
|
|
promo
from United Kingdom on 2003-09-14 11:20 [#00862256]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict
|
|
JAroen,
You look like a dork and act like one. If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen! And you know what that means.
|
|
big
from lsg on 2003-09-14 11:22 [#00862260]
Points: 23754 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
yeah: i'm hungry
|
|
JAroen
from the pineal gland on 2003-09-14 11:24 [#00862264]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular
|
|
mm ill leave
its just that there wasnt any need for such a semi-intelligent rant
|
|
promo
from United Kingdom on 2003-09-14 11:25 [#00862265]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict
|
|
Bye.
|
|
Morton
from out (Netherlands, The) on 2003-09-14 11:28 [#00862272]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict | Followup to promo: #00862256
|
|
man, are you even able to discuss anything with anyone without it ending up in a cocky remark parade?
everytime i see posts by you, you're swearing at people and are being a dick with an attitude
you must think that this hothead attitude is cool or something
i don't get that, it's actually quite pathetic imo
|
|
promo
from United Kingdom on 2003-09-14 11:30 [#00862274]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict
|
|
Oh relax. People get what they give.
|
|
big
from lsg on 2003-09-14 11:31 [#00862277]
Points: 23754 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
i think thats just how promo wants to be i dont always like it too much either his arguments that have some point to them most of the time would come across better i he'd be nicer. i'd reply to him more anyway
|
|
big
from lsg on 2003-09-14 11:35 [#00862281]
Points: 23754 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
i didnt give anything to get the remark that i'm thick
|
|
promo
from United Kingdom on 2003-09-14 11:35 [#00862282]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict
|
|
Well JAroen did kinda ask for it with that 'blah blah' comment. So what do you expect? Besides he's just playing cry baby and you guys as predictable as you are falling straight into his hands like bees to honey.
|
|
vio
on 2003-09-14 11:36 [#00862284]
Points: 87 Status: Lurker
|
|
2 reasons for mira calixs success:
shes a girl doing electronic music, WOAH!
and shes married to Sean (or is it rob?well thats not the point... the point is thats the only reason she got signed to warp. And dont deny it either... the music buisness (yes even the underground is a buisness) is all about who you know, and connections. I bet warp get a fuckload of demos all the time, that blow her out of the water... but she has connections... and therefor, logically, she gets the record deal. Its just the way things work)
Scripted opinions. Clichéd bullshit.
...and I've heard your music and Mira's... I know which I prefer.
|
|
Messageboard index
|