|
|
zaphod
from the metaverse on 2003-11-29 20:01 [#00970843]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict
|
|
one wonders if tolstoy would be as well known today had he gone with his original title, "war, what is it good for?"
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2003-11-29 20:13 [#00970849]
Points: 24586 Status: Regular | Followup to zaphod: #00970843
|
|
Probably, yes -- I think this shallowness associated with consumerism and marketability is mainly a modern phenomenom... look at "pink floyd"... woah, would they EVER have become famous these days with a name like that?
|
|
zaphod
from the metaverse on 2003-11-29 20:15 [#00970851]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict
|
|
indeed
|
|
addi b
from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2003-12-01 20:56 [#00973417]
Points: 160 Status: Lurker
|
|
Im totally going for Dostoyevsky here .You cant really say one author is "better" than the other but you can reflect on how they have influenced you. I have read both pretty thoroughly and Dostoyevsky has given me a lot more.
My favorite book of all time is "The Brothers Karamazov", I actually started believing in God for a moment after that one :) Something about the conflict between Ivan and Alyosha that intrigued me and also the character of Father Zozima. A total must-read for everyone. "The Grand Inquisator" is e.g. a total fucking madman, pure literary genius.
Dostoyevsky was a lot more intense and understandably so as he was a compulsive gambler and led to an execution which turned out to be a hoax. After that he was sent to a prison in Siberia for treason which served him very badly because of his epilepsy.
Tolstoy on the other hand was the "thinker" who promoted anarchy and social awareness of Russia. Both were total geniuses but its my opinion that by constantly contradicting himself in his works Dosto set himself a bigger goal to achieve and I admire that alot. Taking the long and winding road is always more challenging and revarding. Therefore he gets my vote and admiration.........
|
|
hevquip
from megagram dusk sect (United States) on 2003-12-01 21:53 [#00973558]
Points: 3377 Status: Regular
|
|
i prefer Camus over the aforementioned authors.
|
|
_user
from rostov-on-don (Russia) on 2003-12-01 22:32 [#00973621]
Points: 1260 Status: Regular
|
|
i'm kinda shocked................
.....this thread goes to my favs............
|
|
addi b
from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2003-12-01 22:50 [#00973644]
Points: 160 Status: Lurker
|
|
what is so utterly shocking my little peasant?!
|
|
k_maty
on 2003-12-02 04:03 [#00973802]
Points: 2362 Status: Regular
|
|
i prefer dostoyevsky over tolstoy
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2003-12-02 05:47 [#00973859]
Points: 24586 Status: Regular | Followup to hevquip: #00973558
|
|
Camus is good, but his canon of works isn't that extensive. Not that should per se count against him, as The Stranger, The Plague and The Fall are fantastic books. I just think that Fyodor D. was more complete. Existentialism is deeply flawed.
|
|
MachineofGod
from the land of halo's (United States) on 2003-12-02 13:40 [#00974371]
Points: 3088 Status: Lurker
|
|
camus and dostoevsky werent existenatialists....
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-12-02 13:42 [#00974379]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
Fyodor all the way. I don't see Sega naming lightgun game franchises after Tolstoy's works :P
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2003-12-02 15:46 [#00974577]
Points: 24586 Status: Regular | Followup to MachineofGod: #00974371
|
|
Camus was. I never mentioned Dostoyevsky being an Existentialist.
|
|
Dozier
from United States on 2003-12-02 17:56 [#00974762]
Points: 2080 Status: Lurker
|
|
is it dostoevsky or dostoyevsky? my copies of 'the idiot', 'crime and punishment', and 'notes from the underground' all have it as 'dostoevsky'.
i just want to understand.
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2003-12-02 19:32 [#00974830]
Points: 24586 Status: Regular | Followup to Dozier: #00974762
|
|
It depends which country you're in, John. In the UK, his name is now generally spelt, dostoyevsky, tho I've seen old editions of his works without the initial Y.
I've also seen his name spelt Dostoiefski.
|
|
MachineofGod
from the land of halo's (United States) on 2003-12-03 18:59 [#00976128]
Points: 3088 Status: Lurker
|
|
no, your wrong, i know a lot about camus and have researched his work a lot...he definately isnt an existentialist and if youve read anything aside from the stranger or even interviews you would know that. camus was not pessimistic at all. camus being an existentialist is one of the most widespread lies there is in litterature.
by the way, there is a difference between discussing existeniAL ideas and being an existenistalIST (i just did that to emphasize the endings, to make it clearer) sartre is an existentialist, he has stated that millions of times, but he also has had many assumptions(same with kafka) made about him. im not as familiar with kafka\sartre to be able to talk about their views as much(im just bringing these guys in, i know no one mentioned them yet).
by discussing the negative aspects of life, that does not make one pessimistic\existentialist...people usually think camus is existentialist because they cant understand the differences between the views themselves and just discussing them...im ranting now, so im done for now.
|
|
MachineofGod
from the land of halo's (United States) on 2003-12-03 19:02 [#00976134]
Points: 3088 Status: Lurker
|
|
its either dostoevsky or dostoyevsky depending...its also been dostoevki...same with tolstoy\tolstoi depending on whoever translated it and what they preferred.
wow, my previous post came across and completely angry and critical of what you said, i didnt mean that.
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2003-12-03 19:17 [#00976150]
Points: 24586 Status: Regular | Followup to MachineofGod: #00976134
|
|
So he didn't believe in the essays and plays and books he wrote? :S Man, that sucks--Imma burn my copies of them.
I for one, btw, never equated existentialism with pessimmism.. there are MANY branches of this philosophy -- i like the one saying there was a god, but he died :D most religions actually have gods that are dead.. it's quite a modern religious invention to have a god still alive !
|
|
cuntychuck
from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2007-04-02 07:12 [#02068465]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker
|
|
i am reading brothers karamazov.
|
|
cuntychuck
from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2007-04-02 07:21 [#02068467]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker
|
|
and, its pretty fucking good actually... even though it takes me quite a lot of time to read fjodors books for me.
|
|
QRDL
from Poland on 2007-04-02 09:15 [#02068514]
Points: 2838 Status: Lurker | Followup to cuntychuck: #02068465
|
|
Brothers Karamazov is my favorite. Pity it wasn't finished.
|
|
QRDL
from Poland on 2007-04-02 09:16 [#02068515]
Points: 2838 Status: Lurker
|
|
The Idiot was also pretty awesome, but it was my friend's favorite and he was first to it.
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2007-04-04 16:33 [#02069394]
Points: 24586 Status: Regular | Followup to QRDL: #02068515
|
|
The Idiot is probably my favourite Dostoyevsky. I work with some Latvians, and got one of 'em to get me a Russian-language copy of the book, that's how dedicated to this book I am. Dosvedanya.
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-04 17:25 [#02069403]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to MachineofGod: #00976128 | Show recordbag
|
|
you're not around anymore but you're totally completely wrong.
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-04 17:25 [#02069404]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
..on so many levels...
|
|
thatne
from United States on 2007-04-04 17:56 [#02069409]
Points: 3026 Status: Lurker
|
|
i read the brothers karamazov after kurt vonneguts recommendation but i wasnt so impressed. the only thing that remains with me about is that i read albert camus' the stranger right afterwards and imagined an intercon nection between the two regarding the trials but that was in another mentality.
|
|
B123
from The wicked underbelly (Australia) on 2007-04-04 18:48 [#02069459]
Points: 1361 Status: Lurker
|
|
I tried to read crime and punishment but it was such an old copy it gave me hayfever
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2007-04-04 18:56 [#02069462]
Points: 24586 Status: Regular | Followup to B123: #02069459
|
|
Was it made from pressed flowers?
|
|
B123
from The wicked underbelly (Australia) on 2007-04-05 09:17 [#02069642]
Points: 1361 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #02069462
|
|
it was made out of the guy out of napoleon dynamite's acting career.. b'dm ch.
'nah, twas a dusty and musty 'ol thing. got a copy you can lend?
|
|
Combo
from Sex on 2007-04-05 11:03 [#02069675]
Points: 7540 Status: Regular
|
|
I LIKE HIS BOOKS.
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2007-04-05 17:14 [#02069770]
Points: 24586 Status: Regular | Followup to B123: #02069642
|
|
Yes, I do.
|
|
DeadEight
from vancouver (Canada) on 2007-04-05 18:26 [#02069783]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular
|
|
the equation of pessimism and existentialism is pretty confusing indeed.
i'm still piss-poorily read, really just dabbling right now in mid-century frenchies like Blanchot, Bataille and Genet...
but Dostoevskii is badass. as for the question of how to spell it, my impression is that there really isn't a proper way to spell out slavic names in a non-slavic alphabet... it seems like it's kind of up to you really. all the different takes are just different attempts to mirror the phonetic equivalent in cyrillic. as you can see, i've gone with the double "ii" to seem like a pretentious motherfuck.
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2007-04-05 18:35 [#02069784]
Points: 24586 Status: Regular | Followup to DeadEight: #02069783
|
|
Being well-read is only useful for vacuous conversations with other well-read people, don't worry about it.
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2007-04-05 18:36 [#02069785]
Points: 24586 Status: Regular | Followup to DeadEight: #02069783
|
|
Oh, and if you're gonna go with the Double i, I think you have to use an F instead of a V... maybe.
|
|
B123
from The wicked underbelly (Australia) on 2007-04-06 06:03 [#02069880]
Points: 1361 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #02069770
|
|
Do you feel like lending it to me? I'll write a 150 word review..
|
|
DeadEight
from vancouver (Canada) on 2007-04-06 15:50 [#02070042]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular | Followup to marlowe: #02069785
|
|
yeah "f"s would be better.
|
|
QRDL
from Poland on 2007-04-06 16:09 [#02070044]
Points: 2838 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeadEight: #02069783
|
|
I guess it depends on how you pronounce "y" or "ii" at the end of a word. I would deffinately go for "v" instead of "f".
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2007-04-06 17:27 [#02070049]
Points: 24586 Status: Regular | Followup to B123: #02069880
|
|
I would, but Australia is full of convicts and I'd probably never see it again!
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-06 18:23 [#02070051]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Dostoevsky
|
|
QRDL
from Poland on 2007-04-06 19:55 [#02070055]
Points: 2838 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02070051
|
|
Well maybe, but I don't think native English speakers know that they should pronounce the "e" as "ye", so I think "Dostoyevsky" is better.
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2007-04-06 21:04 [#02070057]
Points: 24586 Status: Regular | Followup to QRDL: #02070055
|
|
Normally, there'd be those two full-stops hovering over the vowel to indicate that it's the start of a new syllable... haven't a clue what they're called since we don't really use them in Britain anymore, having resorted to using a dash, thus: co-operation.
|
|
Amnesiac
from ERIE (United States) on 2007-04-07 00:11 [#02070083]
Points: 2084 Status: Lurker
|
|
the brothers karamazov is the best book ever written
|
|
xkejjer
from Malta on 2007-04-07 00:21 [#02070084]
Points: 274 Status: Lurker
|
|
this is stupid.. just because Tolstoy wrote lengthier novels (generally) it doesn't mean that they didn't need to be long. it doesn't mean that if Dostoevsky did them, they would have been much shorter. novels like anna Karenina and war and peace need their length, and need their huge nature in order to sustain all the subplots and character arcs
simplistic idiots.
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2007-04-07 05:43 [#02070136]
Points: 24586 Status: Regular | Followup to xkejjer: #02070084
|
|
It would have been helpful for you to have used the Reply function to indicate who that is in reference to.
|
|
dariusgriffin
from cool on 2007-04-07 05:56 [#02070138]
Points: 12412 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #02069784
|
|
Even then, as I've been told by well-read persons, a lot of well-read people know about books without having actually read them.
|
|
B123
from The wicked underbelly (Australia) on 2007-04-07 06:33 [#02070141]
Points: 1361 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #02070049
|
|
Shine your shoes gov'na?
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
QRDL
from Poland on 2007-04-07 06:43 [#02070144]
Points: 2838 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #02070057
|
|
Two dots over "e" in Russian make "yo" (with short "o") out of "ye". For example in the first syllable of Fyodor - Фёдор.
But it's early in the morning and I'm not sure if I understand what you meant.
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2007-04-07 06:46 [#02070146]
Points: 24586 Status: Regular | Followup to dariusgriffin: #02070138
|
|
Yep, that doesn't surprise me at all!
B123: Away with you, ruffian!
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-07 16:47 [#02070289]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to dariusgriffin: #02070138 | Show recordbag
|
|
I know lots about books, but I hate reading fiction, so I haven't read most of them. wir kinder auf bahnhof zoo.
|
|
Cnut
from the future on 2007-04-07 17:10 [#02070308]
Points: 526 Status: Regular
|
|
nabokov's 'bend sinister' is excellent
|
|
Drunken Mastah
from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-04-07 17:11 [#02070309]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
10101001000010101
100!
|
|
Messageboard index
|