|  | 
        
         |  | 
        
         |  nacmat
             on 2003-07-24 08:49 [#00792099] Points: 31275 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | ok, I love autechre... but, I was thinking... 
 could I recognize any autechre track if I heard it without
 seeing the name?
 of course we all recognize all the famous tracks... but some
 of them... I dont know
 
 at least I am sure I would recognize any aphex track, and I
 am not sure this would happen with ae.
 
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Skink
             from A cesspool in eden on 2003-07-24 08:50 [#00792103] Points: 7483 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | If it was from any of the albums i own then i think i could recognise it.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  roygbivcore
             from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-07-24 08:52 [#00792104] Points: 22557 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | yes 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  nacmat
             on 2003-07-24 08:52 [#00792106] Points: 31275 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | you think you could recognize any of the confield tracks? I am sure I would with the really famous ones (1, 2, 3, 6,
 9) but I think I am capable of mistaken the rest
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Anus_Presley
             on 2003-07-24 08:53 [#00792107] Points: 23472 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | i could 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  roygbivcore
             from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-07-24 08:54 [#00792109] Points: 22557 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | telly savalas 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Skink
             from A cesspool in eden on 2003-07-24 08:55 [#00792111] Points: 7483 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | I once did a test of this, My friend played me tiny clips from songs down the phone and i had to guess what they were,
 i got all of them right that surprised me no end.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  roygbivcore
             from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-07-24 08:57 [#00792116] Points: 22557 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | cause you're in love 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  nacmat
             on 2003-07-24 08:58 [#00792118] Points: 31275 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | I have 17 diferent autechre releases, all original... 
 right now I dont even remember how does track 2 in peel
 session 1 sounds
 
 or hoe does track 3 in cichlisuite starts...
 
 thats what I am talking about... I think I could mistake
 some of them with eachother
 
 one thing that can be the cause is that I always listen to
 the whole record, without seeing the track tittles or even
 noticing what track number I am with... I just play the
 record from start to end... maybe thats why now I doubt
 
 but anyway, if I am listening to any of the records I have,
 whenever a track ends I know which one is about to start...
 that at least I am capable of
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Ophecks
             from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2003-07-24 09:07 [#00792133] Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Yeah, I know them pretty well, and I have a knack for the track names and the spelling. I know Autechre like the back
 of my hand or your mom.
 
 I don't listen to Amber much though, that one is a bit hazy
 for me.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Anus_Presley
             on 2003-07-24 09:08 [#00792135] Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ophecks: #00792133
 | 
| 
     
 
 | haha. 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  roygbivcore
             from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-07-24 09:10 [#00792140] Points: 22557 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | i think this woman just said "thats my foot" 
 live bowery
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  roygbivcore
             from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-07-24 09:14 [#00792145] Points: 22557 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | but i sure as hell don't apologize to autechre 
 they know what they fuckin did
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  pyro5hit9rind
             from Pickering (Canada) on 2003-07-24 10:48 [#00792262] Points: 315 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | autechre is great. the best track is eutow from disc 1 of the tri repetae++ album
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Spacecadet
             on 2003-07-24 10:51 [#00792267] Points: 1790 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | i never remember any track names, apart from the famous ones ooh and clipper
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  roygbivcore
             from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-07-24 10:51 [#00792268] Points: 22557 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | THEY KNOW WHAT THEY FUCKIN DID 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  catharsis
             from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-07-24 10:54 [#00792274] Points: 836 Status: Regular
 | 
| 
     
 
 | yup.  I listen to the CD with the tracklisting with me at all times.
 
 I can't remember the names of my family members though.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  alnuit
             on 2003-07-24 12:16 [#00792327] Points: 1113 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #00792099
 | 
| 
     
 
 | I know just what you mean...though with the combination of the amount of music I listen to and my poor poor memory...it
 is hardly a wonder.
 
 But I can always place the album it is from. It is just the
 name that beats me.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  recycle
             from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2003-07-24 14:09 [#00792438] Points: 40934 Status: Regular
 | 
| 
     
 
 | i know every autechre track, like i know Opheck's mom 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Jaser
             from Castle Greyskull (United Kingdom) on 2003-07-24 14:47 [#00792531] Points: 2101 Status: Regular
 | 
| 
     
 
 | I have been listening to autechre since 92-3. Incunabula Album sort of time. I have listened to all of the Albums /
 EP's Intensily at the time of release and intensily to match
 my own moods. I could not name every track they have made
 but probably half of them on listening to them, discluding
 pronouncation issues. I could geuninely say I could name
 which album / ep all the tracks are from. Hands down.
 
 Aphex is only better at the moment because we are young and
 love the nice and nasty dichotomy. When we get really old
 and bitter we will all be listening to autechre. Autechre
 are just aphex with a sense of humour transplant. And maybe
 take themselves too seriously, I just refer to autechre as
 premediated serious musical crime where as aphex is
 opportunist, audio vandalism.
 (Scaring old women and children type).
 If you know what I mean.
 
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  _user
             from rostov-on-don (Russia) on 2003-07-24 15:23 [#00792599] Points: 1260 Status: Regular | Followup to nacmat: #00792099
 | 
| 
     
 
 | not any track.....i usually recognize an album, but not all tracks....
 
 [track 2 from peel session 1 is inhake2.this track is always
 recognized....]
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  DaWeeze
             from WANTED IN 16 STATES! on 2003-07-24 16:31 [#00792662] Points: 5213 Status: Addict
 | 
| 
     
 
 | I can name any Autechre track with frightening precision in spelling...
 
 ;)
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  diablo
             on 2003-07-24 17:24 [#00792709] Points: 3242 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Incunabula = analogue bliss. The rest I can take or leave. 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  nacmat
             on 2003-07-24 18:12 [#00792747] Points: 31275 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | this thread has opened my eyes: 
 I need to listen to autechre a lot more
 
 maybe this explains it all:
 
 all the 17 releases of autechre that I have were bought in
 the last year and a half.... thats to much music to remember
 so soon
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Oddioblender
             from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2003-07-24 18:17 [#00792751] Points: 9601 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #00792099
 | 
| 
     
 
 | i can easily forget the track names myself. 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Zombiekev
             from Ardmore (United States) on 2003-07-24 22:40 [#00793013] Points: 2857 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #00792099
 | 
| 
     
 
 | nope, there's just too many tracks. 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  xf
             from Australia on 2003-07-24 22:43 [#00793015] Points: 2952 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | i always forget track names. 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  mappatazee
             from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-07-24 22:46 [#00793016] Points: 14302 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | I'd know it was autechre, but I would only be able to say what album, not likely what track #, or even the track name
 for most of them.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  nacmat
             on 2003-07-25 03:13 [#00793214] Points: 31275 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | I would recognize a track being autechre I would also recognize the album it belongs to (I think with
 85% of the tracks)
 I would recognize the track number of it in that album (this
 maybe with 60% of the tracks)
 but I would hardly know any names
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Q4Z2X
             on 2003-07-25 03:16 [#00793215] Points: 5264 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | i might recognize them, but i'm never sure of the pronunciations..
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  merg
             from The New New York (Berlin) (Germany) on 2003-07-25 03:26 [#00793220] Points: 1708 Status: Regular | Followup to diablo: #00792709
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Incunabula rocks my friggin world! 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  catharsis
             from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-07-25 06:09 [#00793361] Points: 836 Status: Regular
 | 
| 
     
 
 | I don't move on to new albums until I've listened to it at least 5 times and can rehearse the tracklisting.  I'm very
 anal.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Refund
             from Melbourne (Australia) on 2003-07-25 07:04 [#00793382] Points: 7824 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | I rememeber the names of the important ones only 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  titsworth
             from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-07-25 07:06 [#00793383] Points: 14550 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | i don't recognize 75% of autechre and i own all the albums and several EP's/singles. it's mostly due to the absolutely
 stupid track naming system they've had going on for the
 greater part of 10 years, but also because a lot of autechre
 sounds the same. i'm also having problems naming aphex songs
 from drukqs on after because he's adopted the autechre
 antagonistic song titling scheme. and before someone tells
 me the titles all mean something, i kwow. but they don't
 mean a damn thing to me except "fpgjfglfjfkl;gkjfg."
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Jarworski
             from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2003-07-25 07:09 [#00793388] Points: 10836 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | who? 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  corticalstim
             from Canada on 2003-07-25 07:11 [#00793390] Points: 3885 Status: Regular | Followup to titsworth: #00793383
 | 
| 
     
 
 | yeah - that bugs the hell out of me - how are you supposed to tell your friend that this track is called "Kladfvgbung
 Micshk" or "Hy A Scullyas Lyf A Dhagrow" :S
 
 some tracks are alright though - like Avril 14th and Cock
 ver10
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  corticalstim
             from Canada on 2003-07-25 07:16 [#00793393] Points: 3885 Status: Regular
 | 
| 
     
 
 | at the end of the day the names arent what matters anyways - its the music
 
 if you can recognize an artist's sound rather than
 individual songs, i think it speaks better for that
 particular artist.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  rockenjohnny
             from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2003-07-25 07:19 [#00793395] Points: 7983 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | yep, and gescom also. i wouldnt be a crazed fan otherwise :)
 
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  The_Funkmaster
             from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-07-25 07:33 [#00793410] Points: 16280 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | well if I hear an autechre song, I'll be able to tell what album it's on and the track number most likely... but like
 titsworth said, as far as the exact name I might not, cause
 the names are so weird!!
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  titsworth
             from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-07-25 07:36 [#00793413] Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to The_Funkmaster: #00793410
 | 
| 
     
 
 | i wonder if they think they're being apropos naming their tracks "weird" things because their music is (supposedly) so
 weird or different.. when really they're doing a huge
 disservice to themselves as it's totally obnoxious
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Jarworski
             from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2003-07-25 07:42 [#00793417] Points: 10836 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00793413
 | 
| 
     
 
 | There's so many different possiblities for artists naming their tracks as unintelligible garbage. They could be
 completely pretentious wankers; They could want to sidestep
 giving their songs meaningful titles as that can come
 across as pretentious, especially with instrumentals (and
 with the cold style of latter ae); They could simply want
 people to be unable to refer to the individual tracks in
 conversation as they're impossible to pronounce; They could
 just want to add mystique.. it goes on and on. At the end of
 the day, the track names are arse and the music is more
 important.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  rockenjohnny
             from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2003-07-25 07:46 [#00793421] Points: 7983 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | havent they said that their song titles are to personal references to samples used?
 
 thats not half as ghey as the try-hard wacky titles that
 aphex has pulled
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  titsworth
             from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-07-25 07:49 [#00793424] Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jarworski: #00793417
 | 
| 
     
 
 | of course the music is the most important thing, but it's bloody obnoxious to name your track something people will
 have a hard time remembering, let alone pronouncing. aphex,
 mogwai, lfo, and a lot of other artists have gone on record
 about how they name their tracks rather inappropriate things
 simply cos there isn't usually an apt title. however, by
 naming something properly, even if it doesn't carry a
 specific meaning, it makes things a lot easier on everyone
 and i find that being able to refer back to an individual
 track is beneficial for a musician's career. i think that's
 one reason autechre aren't half as popular as aphex,
 especially in the media (not that i value their opinion, but
 they do have influence over millions). anyway, it's not that
 i disagree with what you said or that i don't understand why
 a musician would name their track "g;hkjg;hkjhj;h" but i
 just see it ultimately detrimental to practically
 everything.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  nacmat
             on 2003-07-25 07:49 [#00793425] Points: 31275 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | what I do at the end is that I listen to the whole album or ep from start to end... I never listen to just one track...
 so I will be able to know what album or ep a track belongs
 to, but hardly anymore, unless is a real ,famous track (rae,
 acroyear, bine, cipater, cichli, cpach, piezo.....)
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  nacmat
             on 2003-07-25 07:51 [#00793426] Points: 31275 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | in this thread I wasnt really talking about the track names, I was only talking about identifying the track... no matter
 if you know the name, but that you are able of knowing what
 track is it, what album from and what number it has on that
 album, the tittle is not neccessary for that
 
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  rockenjohnny
             from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2003-07-25 07:52 [#00793428] Points: 7983 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | plus autechre titles often do pronounce something if you put a Little bit of thought into reading it
 
 some are also focused on imagery
 
 eg lentic catachresis, 'lentic' being a cloud formation that
 looks like a flying saucer
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  titsworth
             from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-07-25 07:54 [#00793429] Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #00793426
 | 
| 
     
 
 | i know.. and i'd like to clarify again that a lot of autechre to me sounds the same.. as cool as their music is,
 i don't think they have as much diversity in their sound
 (per album) as aphex, boc, lfo, prefuse 73, or even plaid.
 obviously you can tell if you're listening to "teartear" or
 "bine", but as far as individual tracks on a certain album,
 i can identify the album but a lot of their music doesn't
 stay with me, like i can't get it stuck in my head. i guess
 that's cos of their unique take on melody (subverting it,
 taking it out of the foreground, making it harder to access)
 more than anything else, like instrumentation or technique.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  titsworth
             from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-07-25 07:56 [#00793435] Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to rockenjohnny: #00793428
 | 
| 
     
 
 | yes i know they have meanings and you can force a pronounciation.. key word, FORCE.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  rockenjohnny
             from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2003-07-25 07:58 [#00793438] Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00793435
 | 
| 
     
 
 | its their gimmick alright.. 
 at least they dont wear platfrom boots and bad hair heheheh
 
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  titsworth
             from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-07-25 08:02 [#00793442] Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to rockenjohnny: #00793438
 | 
| 
     
 
 | like quantazelle! that's her gimmick, blue wig, short skirt, platform boots, and NO TALENT.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         | Messageboard index
 
 
        
 |