|
|
diablo
on 2003-07-18 05:33 [#00784683]
Points: 3242 Status: Lurker
|
|
Given a relatively level playing field- ie, water deep enough so that a Shark could maneuver proficiently, but shallow enough so that a Bear could stand and operate with it's characteristic dexterity- who would win in a fight between a Bear and a Shark?
|
|
nobsmuggler
from silly mid-off on 2003-07-18 05:57 [#00784700]
Points: 6265 Status: Addict
|
|
shark speed power and one hell of a sucker punch (bite)
|
|
Jarworski
from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2003-07-18 06:00 [#00784701]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker
|
|
shark
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-07-18 06:01 [#00784705]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker
|
|
sharrk
|
|
Nexus 6
from Netherlands, The on 2003-07-18 06:01 [#00784707]
Points: 3221 Status: Lurker
|
|
a shark much faster and accurate. I mean, I bear would try to give the shark a punch first, but the shark moves so fast that it attacks the bear from behind. A bear would be chanceless.
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-07-18 06:01 [#00784708]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker
|
|
now if you gave the bearr the head of a sharrk, the bearr would win, but we ain't arre we?
|
|
nobsmuggler
from silly mid-off on 2003-07-18 06:08 [#00784721]
Points: 6265 Status: Addict
|
|
ok shark vs tiger
the best two natural preditors about
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-07-18 06:09 [#00784722]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker
|
|
shark again. they can take so much pain and hammerring beforre it actually matterrs.
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-07-18 06:10 [#00784724]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker
|
|
tigerr Vs bearr.
NOW we have a fight.
|
|
nobsmuggler
from silly mid-off on 2003-07-18 06:13 [#00784727]
Points: 6265 Status: Addict | Followup to Anus_Presley: #00784724
|
|
nah tiger
but with tiger vs shark the tiger in imensely flexable, over 3 mtrs long with a head like mini and paws like shovels
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-07-18 06:14 [#00784729]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to nobsmuggler: #00784727
|
|
but the sharrk has no thrroat, the tigerrs instinct says 'thrroat thrroat thrroat' it's doomed if therre is no thrroat to gnaw at.
|
|
nobsmuggler
from silly mid-off on 2003-07-18 06:16 [#00784733]
Points: 6265 Status: Addict | Followup to Anus_Presley: #00784729
|
|
true but shark instict says blood and until the tiger gets cut open the shark wouldnt know it was a threat :)
|
|
diablo
on 2003-07-18 06:25 [#00784742]
Points: 3242 Status: Lurker
|
|
Really good book. I recommend it to all.
Actually, it has little to do with bears or sharks.
|
|
pOgO
from behind your belly button fluff on 2003-07-18 06:26 [#00784744]
Points: 12687 Status: Lurker
|
|
bear.
He'd just have to bop him on the head and knock the shark out
|
|
roygbivcore
from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-07-18 07:03 [#00784787]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker
|
|
dude haven't you ever seen spaceghost?
Bears+Sharks=Mother Nature's Best Friends
cause they're so fierce they get along very well. the bear just walks along a stream while the shark swims.
also, sharks are filled with m80's instead of sexual glands
|
|
catharsis
from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-07-18 07:55 [#00784886]
Points: 836 Status: Regular
|
|
There is a weakness situated above the sharks eyes on their dorsal side called the "dorsal cap". Even a human can punch through this relatively weak area and expose the brain....not good for the shark. There is very little material in that area - it's used for generating electric pulses and the placement of cartilage weakens the outgoing signal.
If the bear managed to exploit this weakness (isn't too hard), it would be game over.
We have no idea whether the sharks teeth (granted there over 3000 of them), would be able to penetrate the bears skin with enough depth to cause significant injury. And then.....would the shark have enough strength in its body to be able to move a giaganitc bear that is firmly rooted on the ground.
THis match would never occur in the first place, but it would have to be a pretty huge shark to claim a victory IMO.
|
|
roygbivcore
from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-07-18 07:57 [#00784891]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker
|
|
i punched a shark in the head once
it was all "OH DUDE I THOUGHT WE WERE FRIENDS!!!!"
|
|
BlatantEcho
from All over (United States) on 2003-07-18 08:05 [#00784905]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker | Followup to roygbivcore: #00784891
|
|
ditto
--------- in any event, if they both were to fight to the death, in shollow water the bear would probably not drown, but out of the water at all, the shark would die.
So I could see the bear taking some damage while dragging the shark out, then that's it.
See I think the bear has the advantage with it's paws, it can swipe without comiting it's whole mass to that movement, the shark is fucking all mouth and the body goes with it.
This is actually a cool topic, I would want to give the bear a fighting chance, I bet he could fuck that shark up.
|
|
catharsis
from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-07-18 08:37 [#00784963]
Points: 836 Status: Regular
|
|
I think so too. There ain't much that would mess up a bear - besides a bullet. Given that it is possible to kill a shark with human hands......
Notice how I said "mess" instead of "fuck".
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-07-18 08:38 [#00784967]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker
|
|
if things got too messy orr long drrawn out, i'd just marrch out and shoot each fuckerr in the head twice.
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2003-07-18 08:42 [#00784971]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
|
|
the bear would beat the shit out of the shark and the shark would die. but, the bear would bleed to death afterwards from the injuries he would recieve.
case closed.
|
|
BlatantEcho
from All over (United States) on 2003-07-18 08:49 [#00784992]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #00784971
|
|
what are you, a mammal/fish detective?
|
|
Jarworski
from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2003-07-18 08:51 [#00784994]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker
|
|
I want to see a bear vs that old bitch from One Foot In The Grave.
|
|
roygbivcore
from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-07-18 09:01 [#00785013]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker
|
|
OH DUDE I THOUGHT WE WERE FRIENDS
|
|
catharsis
from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-07-18 09:11 [#00785025]
Points: 836 Status: Regular
|
|
I think roygbivcore has been on a week-long shroom trip. Everything that trickles out of his mouth (er fingers I guess), is completely fucked.
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2003-07-18 09:12 [#00785026]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
|
|
me likey
|
|
roygbivcore
from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-07-18 09:42 [#00785060]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker
|
|
nope
i've been completely sober since... um.
this morning? last night?
if i were on shrooms i would be laying in the grass etc. i think i said this already.
shrooms are from nature man! a boombox with saw 2 and all the stars in the sky!
|
|
Jedi Chris
on 2003-07-18 10:27 [#00785149]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker
|
|
a shark.....
*runs and hides*
|
|
LeCoeur
from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2003-07-18 10:39 [#00785167]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker
|
|
i'd have to say the BEAR.....his two arms with 4-6 inch claws would rip the sharks relatively unprotected skin to shreads.
the shark would get a mouthful O fur the first testing bite......by then it would be over.
the bear would be having a BBQ with shark steaks......mmmmmmm
|
|
roygbivcore
from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-07-18 10:46 [#00785174]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker
|
|
jesus christ don't you people know shit
the bear would bite down on the sharks head
the m-80s inside the sharks brain would explode killing both
jesus FUCKING christ
|
|
zaphod
from the metaverse on 2003-07-18 10:55 [#00785189]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict
|
|
a shark would own a bear. but a cougar vs a bear, thats different.
|
|
nobsmuggler
from silly mid-off on 2003-07-18 11:02 [#00785205]
Points: 6265 Status: Addict
|
|
how about cobra Vs black mamba
|
|
Amnesiac
from ERIE (United States) on 2003-07-18 11:20 [#00785246]
Points: 2084 Status: Lurker
|
|
it's a band
and the bear would win
|
|
BlatantEcho
from All over (United States) on 2003-07-18 14:47 [#00785567]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker
|
|
"bears can be mean, but frogs are always cool"
consensus seems to be bear now, glad to hear, don't want no shark beating up on us mammals
|
|
earthleakage
from tell the world you're winning on 2003-07-18 15:04 [#00785573]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular
|
|
ive eaten shark but it tasted rather bland
|
|
evolume
from seattle (United States) on 2003-07-18 17:55 [#00785652]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to LeCoeur: #00785167
|
|
the problem with your theory is that bears don' got no thumbs so they wouldn't be able to light the charcoal. them child proof lighters are also (possibly intentionally) bear proof. therefore bar be que-ing shark would be rather difficult. it would have to be shark sashimi.
|
|
BlatantEcho
from All over (United States) on 2003-07-18 22:31 [#00785885]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker
|
|
Shark vs. Bear
|
|
Snakejuice
from Eastern (Western Sahara) on 2003-07-19 01:48 [#00785933]
Points: 167 Status: Lurker
|
|
depends on the size and species of each.
A polar bear would rip the shit out of a great white, they gotta deal with orcas, normally. Kodiak bears are notoriously vicious. Also, bears that snag fish in streams are accustomed to the swimming motion of finned animals and have damn good reflexes if they're catching em through the water.
Plus, I can steal the m80s from the dead shark and the roman candles from the dead bear.
|
|
nacmat
on 2003-07-19 02:56 [#00785935]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
|
aphex
|
|
wizards teeth
from Newcastle (United Kingdom) on 2003-07-19 05:56 [#00785995]
Points: 1070 Status: Regular
|
|
mouse v sperm whale
|
|
uzim
on 2003-07-19 06:53 [#00786024]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker
|
|
pikachu!! i choose you!!
(j/k.)
|
|
nobsmuggler
from silly mid-off on 2003-07-19 06:54 [#00786025]
Points: 6265 Status: Addict
|
|
the mouse could clog the whales heart and kill it
|
|
diablo
on 2003-08-16 04:13 [#00824265]
Points: 3242 Status: Lurker
|
|
So none of you lot has read Bear v Shark yet then? IT IS A MUST READ! Especially those who thought this was a good question! ;)
|
|
mappatazee
from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-08-16 04:30 [#00824268]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker
|
|
funny
|
|
BlatantEcho
from All over (United States) on 2004-01-16 13:22 [#01036662]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker | Followup to mappatazee: #00824268
|
|
saw this band in Portland last night.
Pretty good, not great, but the crowd dug 'em
Coheed headlined, and the place damn near fell down.
|
|
Zephyr Twin
from ΔΔΔ on 2004-01-16 13:33 [#01036682]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
It all depends on the circumstances, IMO.. if the bear was just swimming in the lake minding his own business the shark could fuck his shit right up, as long as he bit down around its head/neck area... other than that I think the bear would win but would more than likely bleed to death.
|
|
BlatantEcho
from All over (United States) on 2004-01-16 13:36 [#01036687]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #01036682
|
|
course, I think we mentioned above (I ain't rereading this post, that's for sure)
that the bear has more versatile weapons in it's claws.
The shark only has a mouth.
Now, if the shark gets its mouth on the bear, game fucking over, but the bear has a much better chance of getting at the shark with its claws and teeth and shit.
------ the lead singer put the mic in his mouth, like trying to swallow it, and was just screaming and shit, it was awesome
|
|
Zephyr Twin
from ΔΔΔ on 2004-01-16 14:19 [#01036727]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to BlatantEcho: #01036687 | Show recordbag
|
|
hahaha, I used to do that in my first band, like put my mouth over the mic and start making weird gurgling noises and stuff
|
|
mappatazee
from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-01-16 14:22 [#01036728]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to BlatantEcho: #01036662
|
|
what was the band?
|
|
horsefactory
from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-16 14:31 [#01036735]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular
|
|
The bear of course, but mainly because it is an invisible bear. It is also a powerful robot. The shark has no chance in fact.
|
|
Messageboard index
|