|
|
hevquip
from a giraffes throat on 2001-10-29 17:33 [#00046722]
|
|
it seems that a lot has been going around about drukqs and how it's not that good. some of it does sound like post come to daddy and sometimes an i care because you do or old aphex acid rehashes, but rather than hearing crap, i hear progression.
|
|
REPHLEX~ology
from UK on 2001-10-29 17:44 [#00046730]
|
|
The thing is drukqs doesn't push that many boundaries. Its good, but i prefer pre jungle aphex.
|
|
Mat
from Birmingham, UK on 2001-10-29 17:46 [#00046731]
|
|
i like it, i havent heard many people dissapointed, especially on this bored
|
|
keughliough
on 2001-10-29 18:01 [#00046732]
|
|
who gives a fuck if it pushes boundaries - is that why you listen to music? i listen to music because it's enjoyable.
|
|
Wizard MaC
from Amersfoort on 2001-10-29 20:36 [#00046758]
|
|
I bought Drukqs today and I must say................it's brilliant in it's own way.
The combination of piano solo's and freaked beats is very interessing.
It's a very pro album and YES it's original again.
|
|
Xanatos
from NYC on 2001-10-29 21:25 [#00046770]
|
|
Its good, its interesting, its new, but its not mind-blowing aphex.
|
|
Condoleezza Rice
on 2001-10-29 21:28 [#00046771]
|
|
drukqs...disappointing?
powers... weakening?!?
|
|
</sine707>
from Frankfurt/Germany on 2001-10-29 21:57 [#00046795]
|
|
disappointed? NO WAY!!!
|
|
Messageboard index
|