|
|
1010-1111-10
from St.John\\\\\'s Newfoudnland, Canada on 2001-10-26 22:16 [#00045879]
|
|
True. Hmmm would it be proper to say we have a limited randomness? (assuming that people consider randomness to be infinity).
|
|
hevquip
from a giraffes throat on 2001-10-26 22:25 [#00045882]
|
|
i'm going to say that people have no randomness, just a free-will to choose from a large array of things such as the numbers in this test. it's then a choice as to which numbers will be picked. i could chosen a number such as "threeve." it is not a number and seems rather random and nonsensical, but the truth is, someone could've thought it up themselves because it already existed and was waiting to be found and chosen. randomness is beyond our minds capabilities to understand or acknowledge. our minds would not be able to put randomness in context. randomness is a concept. randomness could be defined as actions that do not exist because they are based on actions that don't exist.
|
|
dronox
from www.dronox.com on 2001-10-26 22:29 [#00045883]
|
|
A computer picks randomness two ways: 1)With long dumb equations, or based on mouse movement or some other files on the pc.
2) [and I don't think it's been commercially implimented yet] by meausing the mild randomness in the power that's going into the pc.
peace
|
|
dronox
from www.dronox.com on 2001-10-27 04:37 [#00045995]
|
|
*measuring
|
|
Messageboard index
|