RDJ's most complex cd? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
belb
-crazone
...and 130 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613408
Today 0
Topics 127499
  
 
Messageboard index
RDJ's most complex cd?
 

The_Aphex_NIN on 2001-10-19 06:39 [#00043565]



opinions please


 

DblHeLX from moon on 2001-10-19 07:13 [#00043573]



not the most complex.
but certainly the one that varies most in different
styles.some of the songs are quite minimalistic actually
we ARE talking about drukqs, right?



 

DblHeLX from moon on 2001-10-19 07:15 [#00043574]



i think his most complex album is i care because you do or
come to daddy.
quite a bit of different tracks and sounds were used in
those ones.


 

rF on 2001-10-19 08:54 [#00043594]



most complex = come to daddy
most diverse = drukqs


 

Pusher of the Square from Mars on 2001-10-19 09:43 [#00043597]



oh no you got it wrong

Classics = Most complex

Drukqs = Biggest let down


 

Pusher of the Square from Mars on 2001-10-19 09:43 [#00043598]



hehe


 

Peter Phrampton from England on 2001-10-19 09:58 [#00043605]



classics is very simple



 

Pusher of the Square from Mars on 2001-10-19 10:07 [#00043611]



and thats why I put 'hehe' after my post (sarcasm)


 

The_Aphex_NIN on 2001-10-20 04:13 [#00043833]



what about the Richard D James lp?


 

M...m...M on 2001-10-20 04:51 [#00043840]



equation song off windowlicker.


 

Baron Von Picklefoot from The Baron Got a new computer !!!! on 2001-10-20 05:29 [#00043858]



Bucephalus bouncing ball is the best track in my opion!Such
a crazy ass track that fucked up scattered drum beat !
YUMMY!!!!!THE BARON HAS SPOKEN!!!


 

DblHeLX from moon on 2001-10-20 05:34 [#00043863]



HAHA pusher!
your arrogance is great. love it!
drukqs = biggest let down.

its like God has spoken, drukqs SUCKS!

hehe

ps. the last line in no way states my oppinion.


 

M on 2001-10-20 05:49 [#00043869]



This is a crazy paradox.

ps. the last line in no way states my oppinion.

that was your last line, so clearly it must not be your
opinion, but if it's not your opinion then it would state
your opinion, or something...


 

redivi d er on 2001-10-20 05:54 [#00043870]



the following sentence is true.
the preceding sentence is false.


 

M on 2001-10-20 05:57 [#00043871]



*processing*
2 33j4 a;ljdfoijew
lj;iewoi
987297023
9173913579837
*error* *error* *error*


 

re di vider on 2001-10-20 06:04 [#00043874]



lol

damn you READ GODEL ESCHER BACH. it talks about all this
stuff, it's cool as shit.

example:
some words are self-descriptive: "pentasyllabic",
"awkwardnessful"

"heterological" means non-self-descriptive. is
"heterological" a heterological word?


 

M on 2001-10-20 06:12 [#00043875]



I'm going to eventually definately, I love reading stuff
that is as well thought out as autechre. Peter and Paul are
twin brothers. One of them (we don't know which) always
lies. The other one always tells the truth. I ask one of
them: Is paul the one that lies?" "yes" he answers. Did I
speak to peter or paul?



 

M on 2001-10-20 06:22 [#00043876]



Peter? WRONG! trick question... I spoke to Steve.


 


Messageboard index