Burning CDs - is it immoral? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 308 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614154
Today 6
Topics 127544
  
 
Messageboard index
Burning CDs - is it immoral?
 

offline Morton from out (Netherlands, The) on 2003-05-05 06:53 [#00684635]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict | Followup to JAroen: #00684626



you buy 1,5 CD


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-05-05 06:57 [#00684638]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to merg: #00684605



If it illegal is is wrong.....is it not?


 

offline Nexus 6 from Netherlands, The on 2003-05-05 07:00 [#00684641]
Points: 3221 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00684638



no man!
if a 15 year old drinks a beer it's not wrong imo.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2003-05-05 07:01 [#00684643]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00684638



no, thats not the same as "morally wrong".


 

offline merg from The New New York (Berlin) (Germany) on 2003-05-05 07:10 [#00684648]
Points: 1708 Status: Regular | Followup to billabongbill: #00684615



Agreed, I think we're absolved from blame on the count of
the rip-off prices...esp. from big labels...


 

offline merg from The New New York (Berlin) (Germany) on 2003-05-05 07:13 [#00684650]
Points: 1708 Status: Regular | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00684638



Ooooh I've started a debate!

Jedi, morals are your own values, but IMO there's also a
clear argument for a moral law separate from those made by
governments...take marijuana for example, is it "right" to
smoke it in coffee shops in Amsterdam and "wrong" in London
or Berlin where the government says you're not allowed to?
Was it "right" to smoke it before the 1920s (when it was
classified illegal) and suddenly "wrong" when the law was
passed...? Just think about it logically... :-)


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2003-05-05 07:23 [#00684657]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to billabongbill: #00684624



how trrue that is


 

offline merg from The New New York (Berlin) (Germany) on 2003-05-05 07:28 [#00684661]
Points: 1708 Status: Regular



I've just realised I sound a bit like Yoda..."Jedi, morals
are your own values" LOL

Moral your own values are, yes!


 

offline X-tomatic from ze war room on 2003-05-05 14:57 [#00685212]
Points: 2901 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00684638



If it's illegal it is wrong.....is it not?
creepy thought.


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-05-05 14:59 [#00685214]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



its not like i have money to buy it anyway... and i buy the
ones i do like, so..


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2003-05-05 15:01 [#00685222]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



i buy what i can afford.
i steal everything else.

too much good music, so little money.


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-05-05 15:05 [#00685225]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



i don't burn people full cd's usually

just a mix to get them into more of it


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-05-05 15:06 [#00685228]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to merg: #00684661



Is your skin green, and do you have pointy ears?


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2003-05-05 15:09 [#00685234]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Followup to evolume: #00685222 | Show recordbag



Same here.

There's no doubt about it, I've got hundreds of albums that
I haven't paid for, and most of them, I never will. Not
economically feasible to buy all of these... certainly not
yet. But money is not an object in keeping me from listening
to stuff.

And if it's REALLY good, I buy it. It truly has to be
spectacular for me to buy it now though. I have all of
Ovuca's stuff, but I'm never paying a cent for that. Because
there's more important music for me to waste my cash on,
like all Amon Tobin's. Too many artists ahead of him that my
money will go to, so tough break for Ovuca. Maybe in 2030
when I'm loaded.

Or... laying dead in a ditch...


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2003-05-05 15:11 [#00685241]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



It IS wrong, I ain't arguing that. ''Am I Eviiilll??? Yes I
am! Am I Eviiillll? I am man, yes, I am''.


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-05-05 15:12 [#00685244]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker



downloading music is stealing music... so yes, it is wrong!


 

offline manticore from London (ON) (Canada) on 2003-05-05 15:19 [#00685266]
Points: 651 Status: Addict



i really think they should bring back nailing people to
crosses. we could have something like the major record
company inquisition which would go after all the evil
music-thieving bastards and subject them to immense physical
torture until they would admit to their devilish deeds of
downloading J.Lo MP3s from soulseek, upon which they would
promptly be nailed to a cross and left to rot.


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-05-05 15:23 [#00685273]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker | Followup to manticore: #00685266



I sense sarcasm within that post... but seriously, you
really can't come up with any arguement for downloading
music to make it right... well, if you download a cd before
it comes out, and then buys it I guess that would be ok...
but downloading music, and paying nothing for it, is
stealing... there are no if's and's or but's about it... I
download music, and I don't try and convince myself I ain't
stealing, cause I am... but right now in society it's
generally considered by the population to be an ok thing to
do, as most people do it...


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-05-05 15:24 [#00685275]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ophecks: #00685241



Ophecks?? Is that the siren of a police car I here outside
your house..

Muhahaahhahahahahha!!


 

offline manticore from London (ON) (Canada) on 2003-05-05 15:46 [#00685325]
Points: 651 Status: Addict



downloading music is simply socially-acceptable form of
theft (not that the majors would agree, mind). i try to only
download the sort of things i can't get my hands on at any
of the record stores in my city - things which would i would
have to special-order and pay ridiculously high and
unreasonable prices for. if it weren't for soulseek, i
would only know of lusine icl through hearsay, because no
way in hell would i be able to find any of it even in
toronto, really (montreal, maybe, but that's too far away!).
and how about all those rare hard-to-find 12" remixes by
_____________ (insert favourite electronic act here)? again,
if it wasn't for p2p filesharing networks ...


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-05-05 15:48 [#00685330]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



yeah, totally immoral!!!
i do it anyway tho...


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-05-05 15:51 [#00685335]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



burning cd's is like having a great girlfriend but fucking
the girl who lives next door because she's offering you free
pussy. you know it's wrong, you know it's only fucking
yourself over (what, you think artists don't need money to
record music? labels don't need money to pay for albums?
dumbasses), but some of you do it anyway. try some
self-restraint.


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2003-05-05 15:53 [#00685337]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to Ophecks: #00685234



true that!

gimme a reason to actually buy an album and i might buy it.


or, i will often just download it then buy it on vinyl if
it's good . . . until vinyl cutters become really
affordable anyway.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-05-05 15:55 [#00685338]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



im burning movie cds only!

well i burnt like 4 music cds in my whole life (i was doing
it for someone else so i burnt a copy for me as well hehe)
the cds were:
-madonna-dont know what album
-lenny kravitz-greatest hits
-u2-one of their latest albums (the one with beautiful day)
-limp bizkit

thats it


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-05-05 16:01 [#00685345]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



the only way i will burn a cd with no intention of buying it
is if:

1) it some rare limited edition import thing that would cost
$30+ (which i HAVE purchased before, and its a let-down)
2) if i want to preview it a few times before i decide
whether or not i like it and want to buy it
3) if it is rare and completely unavailable and/or never
released

other than that i just download stuff and then decide if i
like it enough to buy it.


 

offline Q4Z2X on 2003-05-05 16:07 [#00685353]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker



it's immortal..


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-05-05 16:10 [#00685356]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



*in best hair-metal falsetto*
it will never DIEEEEEEEEEEEEE!


 

offline nacmat on 2003-05-05 16:58 [#00685386]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



no its not


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-05 17:35 [#00685423]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to The_Funkmaster: #00685273



It's not stealing if it's impossible to buy. No product to
steal.


 

offline corngrower from the fertile grounds of Iowa, w (United States) on 2003-05-05 19:36 [#00685533]
Points: 4404 Status: Lurker



people make there own morals. what you percieve to be right
or wrong is the ultimate factor in personal ethics. you
shouldn't have to make a list to convince your self that
it's ok if you believe in your heart that it really is.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-05-05 19:39 [#00685538]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to corngrower: #00685533



that is a very good point.


 

offline merg from The New New York (Berlin) (Germany) on 2003-05-06 01:20 [#00685778]
Points: 1708 Status: Regular | Followup to corngrower: #00685533



Well, the first point is basically the one I was driving
at...if you think it's OK, then it is! (philosophically
speaking of course)

And the list was just why I knew logically it was OK in my
heart... :-)


 

offline listentoparka from Fisherman's Cove (United States) on 2003-05-06 01:22 [#00685781]
Points: 266 Status: Lurker



i love ripping rich musicians off, it makes me feel warm and
fuzzy inside


 

offline merg from The New New York (Berlin) (Germany) on 2003-05-06 01:36 [#00685795]
Points: 1708 Status: Regular | Followup to listentoparka: #00685781



Of course there is that...


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-05-06 01:55 [#00685802]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



what a bunch of subjective nonsense


 

offline merg from The New New York (Berlin) (Germany) on 2003-05-06 02:05 [#00685806]
Points: 1708 Status: Regular | Followup to tibbar: #00685802



Please elaborate philosophically :-)


 

offline fat kaimo from Finland on 2003-05-06 02:12 [#00685811]
Points: 2003 Status: Lurker



i had a conversation about these things with my brother some
time ago. he's a big enthusiast on open source and free
copyright stuff. his main focus is on freeing program codes
in order to develop them freely (like linux) but it applies
on everything. art included.


 

offline merg from The New New York (Berlin) (Germany) on 2003-05-06 02:20 [#00685819]
Points: 1708 Status: Regular | Followup to fat kaimo: #00685811



And what's your take on it? Is it immoral?


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-05-06 02:20 [#00685820]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



when i say what a bunch of subjective nonsense, what i mean
is that the idea that there is no correct answer to a
question like this is false. people allow themselves to
become subjective to a point of saying whatever you think is
ok, there is no right answer, and i think thats a bunch of
crap. it allows people to just do whatever they feel like
doing and not have to answer for it or feel guilt. and it's
crap. it's a gluttonus mentality. me, me, me.


 

offline merg from The New New York (Berlin) (Germany) on 2003-05-06 02:21 [#00685821]
Points: 1708 Status: Regular | Followup to tibbar: #00685820



Interesting you take that view, presuming you think there's
a one-size-fits-all standard for right and wrong, what would
it be? Law? Religion? A.N. Other?


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-05-06 02:25 [#00685824]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



i attempt to walk the thin line that exists between marilyn
manson and jerry falwell.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-05-06 02:26 [#00685825]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



thats a joke, by the way


 

offline merg from The New New York (Berlin) (Germany) on 2003-05-06 02:30 [#00685827]
Points: 1708 Status: Regular | Followup to tibbar: #00685825



And the serious reply?


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-05-06 02:31 [#00685828]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



there is no "religion", there is only truth and lies.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-05-06 02:33 [#00685830]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



there is a set of rules, like numbers, by which we are
allowed to determine right and wrong...

when people start thinking only of themselves, they start to
create X and Y variables where clearly numbers are present.
then they can solve the equasions any way they like.


 

offline merg from The New New York (Berlin) (Germany) on 2003-05-06 02:42 [#00685833]
Points: 1708 Status: Regular | Followup to tibbar: #00685830



But on what basis do you make your assertion about there
being a definite right answer to the question? What belief
set?


 

offline fat kaimo from Finland on 2003-05-06 02:47 [#00685837]
Points: 2003 Status: Lurker



sorry i'm no good in phrasing these things.. too many things
and my mind can't focus.
i haven't made my mind all the way with it. while my brother
thinks that everything should be free and 'open source',
when it comes to art it gets a little frightening to me.

the day after we had the conversation i decided to put my
albums for free on my www page. of course that doesn't seem
much because i'm not signed and/or respected artist but it
was a big thing to me.

i think that it is more important for the artists to be
heard than getting money for it. if everything can be
copied, why should it be made 'wrong'? why should people who
have a lot of money have the priviledge to have a lot of
art? those who have money still can support the artists they
choose to. i do believe this world relies way too much on
the capitalistic system.

i do burn cd's. but i also buy them. the smaller the
artist/label, the more willing i am to give support.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-05-06 02:47 [#00685838]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



Christianity.

even though i was joking, i was quite serious... i find most
organised "religion" throughout history has been HIGHLY
offensive to the standards of God as laid out in the Bible.
i do not support televangelists. i do not support the
militant, sacreligious nature of catholicism. my only
guidance comes from reading the Word of God, meditative
prayer, and experienceing life. i am very untrustworthy of
church, in general... it is foreseen in the Bible as well,
that there would be a "great falling away" of the church
from its God.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-05-06 02:48 [#00685839]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



sorry for the rant.

just kick me off the soapbox here anytime ;)


 

offline merg from The New New York (Berlin) (Germany) on 2003-05-06 02:59 [#00685850]
Points: 1708 Status: Regular | Followup to tibbar: #00685838



Well that's fair enough then obviously. But me being a
Godless wonder I just approach it from a different angle I
guess!


 


Messageboard index