time signatures | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
recycle
big
...and 570 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614128
Today 7
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
time signatures
 

offline Q4Z2X on 2003-05-04 10:27 [#00683497]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker



all my songs are in 512/512 timing


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-05-04 14:45 [#00683757]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker | Followup to earthleakage: #00683480



dammit man, it's in 7/4 time... I did a music course in
school, and the prof, who's more qualified then you, brought
this song in as an example of strange time signatures... and
she said it was in 7/4 time... and it is, all you have to do
is count!


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-05-04 14:47 [#00683758]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker | Followup to The_Funkmaster: #00683757



sure, it could be in alternating 4/4 and 3/4 time
signatures, but why the hell would someone go through the
trouble of changing the time signatures like that when they
can have one single time signature of 7/4 time? It makes
more sense to use the straight 7/4 time...


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2003-05-04 15:01 [#00683782]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular



i never said it wasnt in 7/4, i was merely pointing out the
difference to you (for your benefit i may add) between the 2
parts of the song. you count 3 then 4 for the intrumental
part in between the verses and 4 then 3 when he's singing.

and yes i can count, and no you don't know your prof is more
qualified and please try harder not to punctuate your
sentences with curses if you want people to take you
seriously and please try to understand someone has told you
something and you blindly believe it when i have also
studied music theory to a great extent in the past and
understand about time signatures instead of someboday just
telling me something


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2003-05-04 15:05 [#00683791]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular



7/4 like 5/4 has to be 2 groups of notes. with 7/4 there has
to be a 3-4 count or a 4-3 count as a natural rhythm, the
same for 5/4 usually being 3-2, i'm unaware ofr any 5/4
songs being 2-3, maybe somebody can point one out to me


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-05-04 15:15 [#00683803]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker | Followup to earthleakage: #00683782



you're not making any sense man... 3 then 4 for the
instrumental, and 4 then 3 when he's singing? Huh? Afraid I
don't understand that... I'd like to know where you studied
music theory...

ok, I was a bit off in saying the lyrics are over the 4 beat
part, the music is over the 3... I have it playing, and the
music is first for 4 beats, and then the lyrics are over the
last three beats in each measure... sorry, I hadn't listened
to the song in a while...

and I said she did say it was 7/4, but that you can also
count it... so I wasn't blindly taking her word for it, I
just mentioned she said it...


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-05-04 15:16 [#00683808]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker | Followup to earthleakage: #00682197



"no, its in 4/4 time with 2 groups of 2 bars of 4/4 and a
one bar of 2/4 in the bridge"

and

"sorry, thats 2 groups of 3 4/4s and 1 2/4 "

I don't know WHAT the hell you're talking about there, but
you ain't saying it's in 7/4 time...



 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-05-04 15:19 [#00683810]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker | Followup to The_Funkmaster: #00683808



ok well the second quote your saying there are repetitions
of 14 beats, but that's it's in 3 4/4 and 1 2/4 measures...
that's wrong though... it is in 7/4 time... that what you
said isn't the same as 7/4 time... and the song doesn't even
follow that pattern that you said... again, I'd love to know
where you studied music theory...


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2003-05-04 15:29 [#00683829]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular



i had a private tutor from the age of 8

if you don't understand what i'm drivveling on about i'm
sorry i'm not able to explain it, ill wait for someone else
to try to put it another way, or you can ask your music
teacher, i'm sure he'll verify everything i've said and
explain it to you more clearly


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-05-04 15:31 [#00683835]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker | Followup to earthleakage: #00683829



nod... I did understand most of what you said, except the 3
then 4, 4 then 3 crap... but what I did understand you
saying is wrong in this case... not that I care really, but
it is wrong...


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-05-04 15:33 [#00683838]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker | Followup to The_Funkmaster: #00683835



ok, so you meant 3 beats, then 4 beats... 4 beats, then 3
beats... ok, gotcha...


 

offline Arca from Boston (United States) on 2003-05-04 15:42 [#00683859]
Points: 12 Status: Regular



earthleakage -

there are about 3 measures of the overture of Stravinsky's
Petrushka in 5/8 that go into 2 - 3 (or at least I've seen
it interpreted that way) and then 4 measures where it
alternates 2 - 3, 3 - 2 and so on.

leave it to Igor...


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-05-04 15:53 [#00683874]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



i always assumed 7/4 was when you counted to seven and went
back to one again.

duh.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-05-04 15:53 [#00683875]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



but thats just me...


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-05-04 15:57 [#00683882]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker | Followup to tibbar: #00683874



it is...


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-05-04 15:59 [#00683891]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



yeah, i was trying to say that earlier in the thread, but i
got confused, i think.

anyway, don caballero uses this timing ALOT! as well as 5/4


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-05-04 16:00 [#00683893]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker



you can count 4 beats, and then 3 beats, and then 3, and so
on... but it's still just counting 7 beats... but just doing
it in a stupid way... :)


 

offline Arca from Boston (United States) on 2003-05-04 16:07 [#00683908]
Points: 12 Status: Regular



just to throw in 2 cents -

I think that when you have a time signature over 4 you count
straight through but when it's over 8 then you count it in
groups (or like a dotted quarter and then a regular quarter
for 5/8) cause everything's subdivided.

but this is all terminology. the further away you can get
from it, the better.


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2003-05-04 16:07 [#00683911]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular



mocking what you don't understand is pretty shallow -
perhaps yout should ask your teacher about phrasing. or
better still say silent, or perhaps stick you what you know
about rather than trying to impress buy attempting to bluff
your way through


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-05-04 16:09 [#00683918]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker | Followup to earthleakage: #00683911



what don't I understand? What am I mocking? I ain't mocking
anything... and I understand this stuff perfectly...
Solsbury Hill IS in 7/4 time... that's all I've been saying
to you... and it is...


 

offline Arca from Boston (United States) on 2003-05-04 16:10 [#00683921]
Points: 12 Status: Regular



just curious about where that was directed...


 

offline diemax from somewhere in tennessee :( (United States) on 2004-05-09 17:38 [#01179935]
Points: 2040 Status: Lurker



we need to start talking about time signatures again, then
i'll have an excuse to sit in on more conversations, as it
is, i don't listen to enough non-crappy music (i.e. my
music) to care about the latest timbuland, eminem, and...
oh dear... who else do the teenagers like
um...
elvis?


 

offline corticalstim from Canada on 2004-05-09 18:00 [#01179961]
Points: 3885 Status: Regular | Followup to diemax: #01179935



oh diemax, you crack me up.

oh yeah - i made a neat song in alternating time signatures
- its "19/5" at the end of each measure - but it breaks down
pretty interestingly.


 

offline Loogie from Oxford (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-09 18:17 [#01179977]
Points: 1371 Status: Lurker



i don't understand time signatures either

if it not 4/4 it's difficult to dance to? no?


 

offline diemax from somewhere in tennessee :( (United States) on 2004-05-09 19:32 [#01180036]
Points: 2040 Status: Lurker | Followup to Loogie: #01179977



untrue actually- if you know how to break it down
symetrically anybody who can actually dance, can dance to
it
of course, most people can't dance

unlike ME!


 

offline diemax from somewhere in tennessee :( (United States) on 2004-05-09 19:33 [#01180037]
Points: 2040 Status: Lurker



/me dances around


 

offline thecurbcreeper from United States on 2004-08-22 13:36 [#01311563]
Points: 6045 Status: Lurker



bola - soup

forcasa 2 - 3/4
forcasa 3 - 3/4
amnion - 3/4 then get's taken over by 4/4
aguilla - 7/4 (nicely done)


 


Messageboard index