|
|
KEYFUMBLER
from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2003-04-30 10:36 [#00678310]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker
|
|
i love it but a lot here think its too poppy or something is fucking PHAT as fuck though, i reckon. with lurvely drums and synthlines and .. and this is the key.. OVER-cheezy vocals that couldn´t be more 80´s. Its like the ultimate Keth chegwins Top of the Pops number 1 that never was!. excellent.
|
|
The_Funkmaster
from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-04-30 10:43 [#00678322]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker
|
|
that track from 26 mixes you mean? Oh my GOD, that track is fucking lame... it's so crap... I could make a better song then that, so why aren't I signed to rephlex huh?
|
|
KEYFUMBLER
from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2003-04-30 10:46 [#00678326]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker
|
|
whats so lame about it?
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2003-04-30 10:49 [#00678333]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
The fact that is any one else other than Aphex attempted to get away with it they would be shit upon by everyone. It is a terrible track...not even worth the space on the plastic disk it takes up.
|
|
The_Funkmaster
from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-04-30 10:51 [#00678338]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker | Followup to KEYFUMBLER: #00678326
|
|
everything... it's a 2nd rate, no 3rd rate attempt at a good piece of electronic music... come on... the stupid melody, the lame ass vocals, which aren't even good mind you... it's CRAP!!!!!
|
|
KEYFUMBLER
from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2003-04-30 10:52 [#00678340]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker
|
|
honestly? is it just cos of the vocals and the poppiness of it? CHEEZE, it is meant to beeze!
|
|
Morton
from out (Netherlands, The) on 2003-04-30 10:54 [#00678344]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict
|
|
it's cheesy but i like it
|
|
KEYFUMBLER
from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2003-04-30 10:55 [#00678345]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker
|
|
stupid melody? too simple for ya or something? its a fuckimg joke track thats meant to have crappy, 80s lyrics cos the whole tackiness is offset by the stupendous fucking PHAT bassline. Do you not get it, like? Its a typical Aphex thing to do. its´s doing to the genre what Squarepusher did to garage with Red Hot Car without the drilly bits...
christ on a bike!
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2003-04-30 10:55 [#00678347]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
If I was to throw shit all over a room and tried to submit it to a moder art gallery I would be laughed at...if Damien Hurst did it, well it would be the greatest example of expressionist art ever...same thing here.
|
|
Phresch
from fucking Trondheim (Norway) on 2003-04-30 10:57 [#00678350]
Points: 9989 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
it's not lame at all. it's....good cheese! also, check out Cylob's "Living In The 1980's".
|
|
The_Funkmaster
from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-04-30 11:01 [#00678357]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker | Followup to KEYFUMBLER: #00678345
|
|
but see, I don't really like "joke" tracks... I don't like crappy lyrics, or tackiness, and ESPECIALLY if it's planned...
Squarepusher's red hot car might have been a spoof type thing, but it sounded excellent... it's a kick ass track... this DMX remix is not imo...
|
|
KEYFUMBLER
from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2003-04-30 11:02 [#00678359]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker
|
|
Phresh.. exactly! some folks obviously read the fucking tabloid rags and see certain art like Hurst and this track, just on the surface, like those bandwagon crappy wankmags
Their fucking loss, the rest of us can enjoy it
|
|
KEYFUMBLER
from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2003-04-30 11:04 [#00678362]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker
|
|
"especially if its planned"? Fair enough i suppose. I agree that forced tackiness CAN be absoulte shit but, anyhow, i think it works in this case
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2003-04-30 11:04 [#00678364]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Anyone remember when the "tabloid rags" submitted a childs painting into the Turner prize competition where it was shortlisted but then disqualified once they found out a child had done it?
And they say IDM isn't elitist bullshit :D
|
|
KEYFUMBLER
from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2003-04-30 11:04 [#00678365]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker
|
|
"especially if its planned"? Fair enough i suppose. I agree that forced tackiness CAN be absoulte shit but, anyhow, i think it works in this case.
|
|
The_Funkmaster
from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-04-30 11:17 [#00678378]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker | Followup to KEYFUMBLER: #00678362
|
|
yeah, it's just a difference of opinion I guess...
|
|
tolstoyed
from the ocean on 2003-04-30 11:19 [#00678382]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator
|
|
not my fav trrack by rdj, but i can listen to it quite easily :)
|
|
AlbertoBalsalm
from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2003-04-30 11:32 [#00678397]
Points: 9459 Status: Lurker
|
|
you like it, you love it. you cannot resist it. to resist is hopeless. you're whole existence is meaningless without this remix
man, what is wrong with some people. can't you enjoy the cheezyness of fun 80's music ...i love DMX Krew and i also this remix
|
|
roygbivcore
from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-04-30 11:34 [#00678399]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker
|
|
haha i love that track
it makes me feel really silly
|
|
DirtyPriest
from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2003-04-30 13:34 [#00678540]
Points: 5499 Status: Lurker
|
|
Its FFFRREEEssshhh like anything else even remotely connected to DMX krew.
|
|
Messageboard index
|