Define the self | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
dariusgriffin
...and 75 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614224
Today 6
Topics 127549
  
 
Messageboard index
Define the self
 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-26 23:14 [#00671619]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



meaning of life is too elusive a thing to question. I just
want to know how you define yourself, what is your identity.
Be as broad as you are comfortable to be... what are you?


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2003-04-26 23:15 [#00671621]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular



i am:

clixby


 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2003-04-26 23:15 [#00671623]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker



pure energy slowed to a dense vibration. i can sense my
surroundings through neuro-transmitters.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-26 23:18 [#00671628]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to weatheredstoner: #00671623



but there is something between your surroundings and the
neuro-transmitter, no? vibration?


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-26 23:18 [#00671629]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to neetta: #00671621



is that the name of that character in your avatar? it's
quite wonderful.


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2003-04-26 23:20 [#00671631]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular | Followup to jupitah: #00671629



no silly, clixby is ADJECTIVE

the lovely avatar is of medli (zelda:ww)

i want a gamecube already


 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2003-04-26 23:20 [#00671632]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker | Followup to jupitah: #00671628



I'm not sure I understand what you're saying.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-26 23:21 [#00671634]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular



you experience the world through your senses. To you, you
seem like an "i"... it is strange, but to me, you are just
another "you"... every single individual has their own
consciousness and sense of "i" so no one individual is
really as unique and the world is not as self centered as
they might think, seeing things from their own perspective.
This book "pattern in the stone" by daniel hillis talks
about universal computers and computing machines and stuff
and it actually throws a lot of light on consciousness and
the computer of our brain. He explains stuff simply because
he knows what he's talking about. our brain is a product of
evolution. everything I wrote here is stupid, except the
book suggestion.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-26 23:23 [#00671635]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #00671634



"you experience the world through your senses"

maybe i am that which i sense, what i feel, internally and
externally.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-26 23:25 [#00671636]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to neetta: #00671631



so are you going to tell me what clixby means?


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2003-04-26 23:27 [#00671639]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular



CLIXBY (adj.)

firmly uninformative
briskly vague
politely rude


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-26 23:29 [#00671642]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular



So you see a river, and you ARE that river just because you
see it? Maybe if you hold a grenade in your mouth and your
brain ends up all over the river and everything else.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-26 23:29 [#00671644]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



i love it, but it sounds so strange i can't imagine ever
putting to use. i would feel akward methinks


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-26 23:32 [#00671645]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #00671642



do you think that before we knew that our brains were the
density of our consious process that we didn't know what we
were? we observe that our brains are central to
experiencial process, but we don't experience ourselves as
brains.


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2003-04-26 23:33 [#00671646]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



hahah .. too much.

assuming the starting point of a self, it seems to me that
ones identity changes in light of context ... although if
you're talking about the essence of the self, then you're
bound to get yourself into a pickle.


 

offline Ganymede from Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius on 2003-04-26 23:39 [#00671655]
Points: 1045 Status: Lurker



Why do people assume that the "self" is a fixed permanent
thing?


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-26 23:40 [#00671657]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to korben dallas: #00671646



see, i think that that's just it, the self is fluid, like
nature, like consiousness. changes in light of context.

i understand my body to be the focal volume of my
consiousness (for ordinary waking state), not the limit to
what i am.


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2003-04-26 23:42 [#00671660]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



paranoid, art, obsession


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-26 23:42 [#00671661]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ganymede: #00671655



i don't, that's why i asked this question. not so you could
question us, but so ou could make some assertions. i like
to get the span of understandings.


 

offline LuxExTenebris from ehh... tenebris? (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-26 23:43 [#00671662]
Points: 478 Status: Addict



want pie now


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2003-04-26 23:45 [#00671665]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



mmm... still usually (ie. when i go to the cornershop to get
some milk) i don't think about my identity so explicitly,
perhaps implicitly - but that would need to be argued for.

truth is a pickle.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-26 23:47 [#00671667]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular | Followup to jupitah: #00671645



korben, you write strange things :)

we still don't know a lot about how brains work, but they're
making parrallel computers now and "neural networks" which I
guess are getting closer. I guess with a normal computer,
only one thing can happen at a time (really fast though of
course), but with a parrell computer, many simultaneous
things can happen at once. the internet has the potential to
be a huge parrallel computer I've read. (imagine shrinking
the internet down to a microchip..) uh, well before we had
enough science to know that our brains are our biological
computers, we just had to guess. Some people guessed hat the
earth was flat. They are probably right, as I have never
sailed around it myself.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-26 23:54 [#00671671]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #00671667



i don't think the flat earth's a fair analogy.

i do think it is incredible how the internet forms patterns
not unlike neural networks. i also find it fascinating that
large portions of the earth's surface is filled with
mycelial networks (of fungus) of a pattern not unlike the
brain or the internet, or the jeweled net of indra. paul
stamets goes so far as to say that the reason he is such a
mycological genius is because he has acknoweldged the
conscious nature of the fungus therefore allowing
communication. maybe he's a nut, eh? sure is a
revolutionary scientist though ;)


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2003-04-26 23:56 [#00671675]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



wmw: do you think about your identity/self when you cook/eat
pikelets (hotcakes i believe you people refer them as)? :)

in asking the question we've already presupposed the answer
- the question can't make sense without already having a
vague idea of what the question is about.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-26 23:58 [#00671677]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular



there's already weird unpredicted "biologicalish" uh,
viruses or something, like spam pop ups. I havn't read
anything about mycelial networks, the jeweled net of indra,
or paul stamets. book recommendation? I like nuts.


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2003-04-26 23:59 [#00671678]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



jupitah .. i think the world is flat is quite a good analogy
- who knows in 182 years they might frown upon us thinking
it was round?

we think it absurd these days to consider the world flat,
but that is because its understood in a different context.
(eg. Kuhn and incommensurability). Similarly it would have
been absurd for them to consider the world round?!


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-27 00:02 [#00671680]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to korben dallas: #00671678



i think i'd like intensely egg shaped worlds :) i hear that
ours is slghtly pear shaped.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-27 00:02 [#00671681]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular | Followup to korben dallas: #00671675



hmm... not really, but I'm doing something innately (eating)
so I can reproduce. I'm computing where I move the spatula
and stuff. you have to think about where you move your hand,
and your hand is part of your self, so I guess I do think
about myself when I eat those pikel l... uh, pickled eggs
you mentioned. Making art seems to lack genetic reproductive
purpose, but maybe it's for memetic purpose instead.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-27 00:04 [#00671683]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #00671677



i've only read articles about and by paul, and one of my
proffessors knows him. his family business with some
interesting articles is www.fungiperfecti.com. i've also
bumped my old topic you should read.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-27 00:08 [#00671684]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



jeweled net of indra is some sort of mythological place of
sanatana dharma ("hindu") tradition. it's been a while, but
i know it involves an infinite network of jewels, the faces
of which reflect you, or something. see the alex gret
artpiece "universal mind lattice". i think the idea is that
there is a spiritual/psychological component of this natural
network pattern. most patterns in nature repeat themself in
psychology and spirituality because the psyche and spirit
are not separate form nature. this is the basis of most
indigenous knowledge, knowing life through living with
nature rather than fragmenting it and studying it
microscopically.


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-27 00:08 [#00671685]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



"alex grey"


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-27 00:11 [#00671687]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to jupitah: #00671684



indigenous people knew that living creatures were based on
some vital thing they called cosmic serpents, twin serpents,
or twisted latters... dna. they knew about it before
microscopes.


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2003-04-27 00:19 [#00671698]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker



alex grey aint as grey as he used to be


 

offline ambsace from canaDUH. on 2003-04-27 00:48 [#00671713]
Points: 6326 Status: Lurker



i am ambsace.

focus primarilly on the last bit of that last
definition...about being the most worthless thing possible.
that's me. =]


 

offline nanotech from Sukavasti Amitaba Pureland (United States) on 2003-04-27 00:58 [#00671718]
Points: 3727 Status: Regular



i think of life as a puzzle game, where finding out how to
disillusion the "self" and finding out ways to move the
"self" outside the bounds of reality. to move into
resonances of chaotic sets.

what is the self? i sugest taking disasoiatives.

i'm not a wise man. to claim so would be very un-wise. just
an infant with a rubix cube before him.


 

offline elated_caution from Duvall (United States) on 2003-04-27 04:38 [#00671847]
Points: 169 Status: Regular



the soul and the mind together.


 

offline Murray from Southend, Essex (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-27 04:40 [#00671850]
Points: 4891 Status: Lurker



The term 'Self' is explained quite well at the end of Metal
Gear Solid 2. but i can't remeber for the life of me what it
is


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2003-04-27 04:43 [#00671859]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker



<- free soul



 

offline anon from ^_^ (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-27 04:43 [#00671860]
Points: 1828 Status: Lurker



elated caution - the soul is the body and mind together.In
the view of friends religion anyway.

I am what you see me as and nothing more.

to me,im young confused and a constant contradiction -
making me allways right :p

anon


 

offline anon from ^_^ (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-27 04:45 [#00671865]
Points: 1828 Status: Lurker



Of course if you asked me this question another day i'd have
another answer because each day teaches me something new and
changes how i think by about a few inches.

anon


 

offline uzim on 2003-04-27 06:53 [#00672112]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



moony.


 

offline xtiaan from city of lost children (New Zealand) on 2003-04-27 07:42 [#00672199]
Points: 500 Status: Regular



as barbra kruger said
"I shop therefore I am"


 

offline pOgO from behind your belly button fluff on 2003-04-27 07:45 [#00672205]
Points: 12687 Status: Lurker



Absolutley Fantastic ;oD


 

offline jenf from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-04-27 11:59 [#00672733]
Points: 1062 Status: Lurker



the self? in what aspect, what definition, what context?
spiritual, physical, metaphysical...? the list goes on...and
on..

sorry to say, but this question is about as vague as the
meaning of life one..


 

offline Spacecadet on 2003-04-27 12:00 [#00672736]
Points: 1790 Status: Lurker



if the human mind was simple enough to understand, we'd all
be to stupid to ask that question


 

offline jenf from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-04-27 12:02 [#00672739]
Points: 1062 Status: Lurker | Followup to Spacecadet: #00672736



hey, you've got a point there :))


 

offline Spacecadet on 2003-04-27 12:03 [#00672740]
Points: 1790 Status: Lurker



i can't take credit for that comment
it was on a docu ;P


 

offline jenf from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-04-27 12:05 [#00672746]
Points: 1062 Status: Lurker | Followup to Spacecadet: #00672740



eh who cares.. just pretend you made it up.. plagiarism is
so trendy these days ;)


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2003-04-27 12:10 [#00672754]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



i am having an identity crrisis, and its making me and
angrrry and i'm losing frriends and its fucking me up. i
just don't know what i believe orr how i want to be seen orr
how i want to live. its harrd.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2003-04-27 12:12 [#00672758]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



i see my self and can't accept what i'm seeing wherre once i
could, but i don't know what i want to be seeing. i make
comments about my stance on the whole pop industrry and have
a 2 sided arrgument battling it out in my head. darrn.


 


Messageboard index