Corrupted Girl | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
recycle
...and 468 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614225
Today 7
Topics 127549
  
 
Messageboard index
Corrupted Girl
 

offline Murray from Southend, Essex (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-18 09:47 [#00656818]
Points: 4891 Status: Lurker | Followup to corrupted-girl: #00656813



*shakes fist at Corrupted, and puts on Grandpa Simpson
voice* Doooooooooooooooooooooooo it! :p


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2003-04-18 09:47 [#00656819]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



oh no. i understood him quick clearly. i just don't agree
with his views on the issue.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-04-18 09:51 [#00656824]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



usually i'd just let something like this go but it's just
too amusing how people are totally distorting what i said.
1) the human body is beautiful, especially women's bodies
(and yes, naked)
2) the thread was about posting pictures of yourself
3) i'm feminist in some ways (as far as equal rights and
power goes; nothing extreme)
4) i think the media are pigs and are to blame for how
fucked up society is
5) i see girls (yes, 18 is still a girl) as being in a
reaaaaal tough situation in society right now (thanks to
britney and internet porn, among other things)
6) i don't take myself too seriously, some of you should
know that by now
7) i take giving advice seriously
8) i often give advice to people who don't want it, don't
understand it, don't even try to understand it
9) i wouldn't have said anything about those pics if she
weren't still a n00b and we had seen her before. but this
was how she was presenting herself to new people and i think
most of you are too cowardly to admit that (or consider
that) that is a wrong way to introduce yourself on here. if
it were someone we know, like neetta (just to use an example
the same age that has been here longer) it would be totally
different cos we already know her and have seen her before.
but because this girl is new here and, if you look at her
messages this week, is trying desperately to get attention
from guys willing to give it, i just felt like this would
prevent her from ever being taken seriously here. neetta's
struggled with people accepting her as a regular
person/music listener/artist instead of just a "cute girl."
with that hindsight i just thought i'd impart some wisdom
before it got worse (more graphic pictures, for example).
anyway, you don't have to agree with me, but shame on you if
you're just in this to get "jerk off" material like
corrupted put it.


 

offline eXXailon from purgatory on 2003-04-18 09:52 [#00656825]
Points: 6745 Status: Lurker



*With cowboy accent*

Oh come on suga hun! I'll be darned if some o' these
youngens ain't interested in them artsy pics o' yers!


 

offline Murray from Southend, Essex (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-18 09:54 [#00656830]
Points: 4891 Status: Lurker



Titsworth, i put right at the start i dont want it for jerk
off material, ive got a whole net of that.

BTW what time is the radioshow on? can i still make that
request?


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-04-18 09:57 [#00656834]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



i didn't single you out Murray; people know who they are. if
they want porn they should download it, not pressure some
impressionable teenager for her nudie pics.

show's on 10am GMT-5 sunday. what's your request? i recall
not having the songs or cd's you wanted....


 

offline Murray from Southend, Essex (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-18 09:59 [#00656838]
Points: 4891 Status: Lurker



Do you have Radiohead - Street Spirit? Or is that too
depressing for the morning? if not then Autechre - Ciapter
please


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2003-04-18 09:59 [#00656839]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



Im not that new. I mean.. im new but i've had conversation
with people here before. It's not like I posted those pics
in my first message ever.

And if everyone here only see's the "new girls" as cute
girls and won't take them seriously because they posted
pics, they fuck them.

Im not here to impress some guys who have high standards of
girls and expect a lot from them to even consider them
cool.
Especially on a message board when you don't even truly know
a person.



 

offline eXXailon from purgatory on 2003-04-18 10:00 [#00656841]
Points: 6745 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00656824



Oh come on, there's a lot more revealing and explicit "jerk
off material" to be found on any random porn/erotic site. It
would be really pathetic if someone got off on a random sexy
pic of a female body.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2003-04-18 10:01 [#00656843]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



If girls here have to work on not being considered just a
"cute girl" .. then fuck it.
That's pathetic. Im sure there's a lot of just "cute boys"
here.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-04-18 10:03 [#00656845]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



eXXalion, i wouldn't put it past many people on here,
especially the 14 and 15 year olds in the "who are you?"
thread who replied to her. don't you remember diastole1? i
didn't think CG would appreciate that sort of variety so i
tried to pre-empt it. i won't next time.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2003-04-18 10:05 [#00656850]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



i neverr saw them, but would it not be betterr if they were
morre explicit? I think so.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-04-18 10:06 [#00656851]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



*that sort of "notoriety" i meant

CG, it's very hard for girls here to be accepted as
individuals instead of cute girls; now maybe you understand
why i stepped in to prevent you from being seen as just some
easy slut willing to post pics of her tits for everyone to
leer at. cos that's how some people would have taken you,
unfortunately. and no, just cos i realize that doesn't mean
i count myself among those people, i just know well this
board well enough to see what's coming before it happens.


 

offline Tab from manchester (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-18 10:06 [#00656853]
Points: 374 Status: Regular



'this was how she was presenting herself to new people'

if i had 2 pics, 1 with moody lighting taken from artistic
angles in grainy black and white, and one taken in a mirror
with a digi cam... well i know which one i would show.



 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-04-18 10:09 [#00656858]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



yeah, yeah, yeah, where are the neetta pics by the way??
dont you want to see your titsworth?

;)

I'm kidding, of course


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2003-04-18 10:11 [#00656863]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to titsworth: #00656851



Okay. I understand what you're saying. Thank you for trying
to help.

I take message boards pretty lightly. So next time you don't
have to try and help me.



 

offline Inverted Whale from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2003-04-18 10:12 [#00656866]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00656851



Just a friendly recommendation - I would tone down the
'father figure' persona a bit.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-04-18 10:13 [#00656871]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



good i'm glad we understand each other and that you take
boards lightly. i hope you continue to take it lightly cos
this board is a joke in many ways; your attitude toward it
will save you from a lot of grief. and yes, next time i
won't try to help you.


 

offline ambsace from canaDUH. on 2003-04-18 10:14 [#00656872]
Points: 6326 Status: Lurker | Followup to Inverted Whale: #00656866



*jumps up and down behind inverted whale*

yeah! yeah!


 

offline ambsace from canaDUH. on 2003-04-18 10:15 [#00656875]
Points: 6326 Status: Lurker | Followup to ambsace: #00656872



goddamn. anyone got a semi-decent joke book? i suck at this
"being funny" thing.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2003-04-18 10:15 [#00656876]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



" it's very hard for girls here to be accepted as
individuals instead of cute girls"

You're making me think of this board as degrading and sexist
and the guys who come here.

But to be honest I had no reason to think this until I
started talking to you.

So im not really sure how accurate that statement that you
made is.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2003-04-18 10:16 [#00656878]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to titsworth: #00656871



Okay good. The everything is fine and dandy then :)


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-04-18 10:16 [#00656880]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



i'll tone it down when the rest of you "men" stop acting
like children, perverts, and cowards. till then i will
always speak my mind and the only thing you can do about it
is ignore me.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2003-04-18 10:16 [#00656881]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to ambsace: #00656875



LOL silly boy. You're funny.. you're funny... relax...


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-04-18 10:17 [#00656885]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



tits, you're not striking a christ-pose in front of your
gateway right now are you?


 

offline Murray from Southend, Essex (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-18 10:18 [#00656887]
Points: 4891 Status: Lurker



Trust me corrupted, girls do kinda have a tough time here.
When my g/f (Anon) joined up here, she was taken at face
value as a girl. After the post she made called 'If you had
a gun' people realised that she had quite abit to say and
wasn't just a pretty face.


 

offline xian_ecci from los angeles on 2003-04-18 10:19 [#00656889]
Points: 251 Status: Regular | Followup to corrupted-girl: #00656881



c-g,
where [if i may] in GMT+5 are you?,, not many here from that
zone .



 

offline corrupted-girl on 2003-04-18 10:20 [#00656892]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



Well then maybe the guys here need to smarten up if they
think that way. And stop stereotyping girls.



 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-04-18 10:20 [#00656893]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



christ figure, father figure, you can call me what you want,
at least i'm man enough to speak up here instead of tossing
around catch phrases or praising the virtues of conformity
or apathy. not to single you out, theo.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2003-04-18 10:22 [#00656899]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



I live in Calgary, Canada xian_ecci


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2003-04-18 10:22 [#00656900]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



this is all a fad that will pass


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2003-04-18 10:24 [#00656905]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker



Theres just not enough music out there to distract us from
these kind of issues.


 

offline Inverted Whale from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2003-04-18 10:24 [#00656908]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00656893



You're just trying to influence the people of the message
board to conform to your own ideals.

A child, pervert, or coward should be free to act that way
if they want - up to a point until it interferes with the
owners of the message board.


 

offline ambsace from canaDUH. on 2003-04-18 10:24 [#00656909]
Points: 6326 Status: Lurker | Followup to corrupted-girl: #00656899



*sigh* unfortunately, we BOTH do.

we should run away. run away to europe to be with the rest
of this lot. we'd be much better off.


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2003-04-18 10:25 [#00656912]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to ambsace: #00656909



YES! im with ya.

ill pick you up in 10?


 

offline Murray from Southend, Essex (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-18 10:26 [#00656913]
Points: 4891 Status: Lurker



Thats quite true Princo :) good point


 

offline eXXailon from purgatory on 2003-04-18 10:28 [#00656919]
Points: 6745 Status: Lurker | Followup to corrupted-girl: #00656912



I totally agree with ambsace! Much more practical with the
dinner thing I suggested earlier! :o)


 

offline ambsace from canaDUH. on 2003-04-18 10:30 [#00656924]
Points: 6326 Status: Lurker | Followup to Murray: #00656913



aye. we should all go d/l jaroen's new track with all the
kitchen sounds. it's really quite good.


 

offline ambsace from canaDUH. on 2003-04-18 10:30 [#00656926]
Points: 6326 Status: Lurker | Followup to corrupted-girl: #00656912



yarr.

-rr?


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-04-18 10:38 [#00656941]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



ok, slow down. you're not a christ figure for taking this
approach ..it's a fucking message board .. come on, that was
a joke.

but listen, I completely agree with you though. I hate it
when girls come upon the realization that the superficial is
good enough (for most males), and will serve as compensation
for other aspects that other people choose to promote as a
representation of themselves... many times the blatent
insecurity for which exhibitions like this are meant to
cover drowns out their actions.. and it's often quite sad.
on the other hand, I dont think anyone belongs on a
self-constructed deus for suppressing instinctive sexual
urges/desires.. I dont think being attracted to one's
physical appearence should be any more shameful than being
attracted to their personality or the depth of their
character. its how one chooses to balance the two that is
worthy of criticsm from others. one shouldnt consistently
take precedent over the other. there are many girls I choose
to keep as friends simply because I'm not attracted to them
in a sexually moving way.. I dont think there's anything
wrong with that or that there's anything wrong w/ my
choosing to apply the same criteria in choosing a
girlfriend.. if I'm attracted to them as a person and
physically attracted to them..then there is potential.. and
on the other extreme.. there are girls I spend time with
strictly for sexual reasons.. no harm done on either side..
if we want it to move forward, we do so. if not, we continue
as we had until we decide to break it off..

I think a woman should be proud of how she looks, and if she
can harness her sexual appeal and apply it as an asset, she
should do so, as it certainly hasnt' proven to disappoint
many women as a means of getting what they want. I truly
believe the vagina is the most powerful thing in this world,
haha.

seriously though, corrupted girl, I wouldnt take these
pictures down because some people object, unless there is
something to be insecure about w/in those pictures.. you
should see t


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-04-18 10:38 [#00656943]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



you should see that your confidence and security in self may
have brought out the insecurity in others.. that is the
reason why people lash out at you.. know that. anger is a
protective device for fear.


 

offline ambsace from canaDUH. on 2003-04-18 10:43 [#00656950]
Points: 6326 Status: Lurker | Followup to theo himself: #00656943



interesting point of view.


 

offline ambsace from canaDUH. on 2003-04-18 10:46 [#00656955]
Points: 6326 Status: Lurker | Followup to ambsace: #00656950



though i don't believe that our little corrupted-girl is out
to make friends by way of showing off her body. i'm under
the impression that the entire idea behind the "who are
you?" thread was just to have fun showing silly pictures of
yourself. those just happened to be her way of loosening up.
i doubt she's insecure about her appearance, otherwise those
pictures never would've seen this board to begin with.

i dunno. i need to think for a moment.


 

offline ambsace from canaDUH. on 2003-04-18 10:49 [#00656960]
Points: 6326 Status: Lurker



"I dont think being attracted to one's physical appearence
should be any more shameful than being attracted to their
personality or the depth of their character. its how one
chooses to balance the two that is worthy of criticsm from
others. one shouldnt consistently take precedent over the
other."

and yes. i couldn't have said that any better m'self.


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2003-04-18 11:06 [#00656997]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular



theo, there aren't any spesific neetta pics, the deal was
about just normal pics of me (no art nor tits) i used to
have on my web page.. most of them of my face. if you want
to see my face its in who are you. also on my web page. i
aint showing you no titties.

even if i did that stupid kid would come and mock me for
being fat hater


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2003-04-18 11:10 [#00657006]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular



i'd like to add that travis was indeed right about that i
have had to struggle to be 'one of the guys' and shit like
this makes me feel it was all in vain afterall.. if other
girls here want to be on a pedestal it makes us others show
up there as well. it resuslts in questions like 'neetta
where are your titty pics' and that is just what i DO NOT
want.


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-04-18 11:12 [#00657009]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



I was kidding



 

offline corrupted-girl on 2003-04-18 11:16 [#00657016]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



I didn't take them down because people lashed out at me.

I whoel intention was not to keep them up in the first
place. Like I said many times before , it was a moment thing
for fun. That's it.

And you're right ambsace.


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2003-04-18 11:19 [#00657020]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular



i actually DID take my REGULAR pic sof my web page because
people were all over me saying how cute..


 

online recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2003-04-18 11:20 [#00657021]
Points: 40076 Status: Lurker



post #100


 


Messageboard index