make track w/ odd time signature | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
ijonspeches
...and 170 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614218
Today 22
Topics 127549
  
 
Messageboard index
make track w/ odd time signature
 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-16 21:16 [#00654081]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular



Try to make a track with an unconventional time
signature and then post it in this thread. I'll
start (and probably be the only one who bothers). The track
has to be composed in a structured way where smaller groups
of x are used as building blocks to create bigger groups of
y (and it can't be the traditional 4 units made of 4 units
each). Here's mine:

http://artists.iuma.com/IUMA/Bands/wmw/
"7 groups of 7 groups of 7"

It isn't a very good track, but it's ... well, it's a TINY
bit of a smidgen interesting, to me anyway.. well I lied,
it's not interesting to me either. But the point is that the
entire track is made in an unconventional time signature (I
have to repeat this concept to you because you are slow)
*suddenly I forget what I'm talking about.

This was going to be my second autechre remix, but then I
realized that it sucks even more than my other
autechre mix. Well in this track there are 7 time units
(pattern rows), composed into a pattern of 49 total units (7
units of 7 units each) and then the 49 blocks are repeated
in 7's too. I don't know why I'm writing so much since this
track really does suck, but maybe you can do better. Even
though nobody will bother. Ta ta! I wonder what I was
writing about in this thread.. I'll reread it and probably
find out I was talking lazagne and stuff.



 

offline LuxExTenebris from ehh... tenebris? (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-16 21:25 [#00654096]
Points: 478 Status: Addict



underscore hurt me eyes


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-16 21:30 [#00654104]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular



That's right folks, step right up, step right up. Don't be
shy! Remember my last track creation suggestion thread?? It
had 80 replies! EIGHTY replies!! How's that for
credibility!? We at w M w have been in the track creation
suggestion thread business for, eh, about THREE WHOLE DAYS!!
While other people claim to have interesting ideas, we here
at w M w DELIVER.


 

offline Q4Z2X on 2003-04-16 21:31 [#00654105]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker



many of my tracks would be considered as having odd time
signatures
such as:
"mharvefundp" kinda based on some noises that i made with
really no solid timing or structure for the most part,
"noyideot"-almost a 4/4 beat but with a bit missing, so it
sounds like it speeds up, but it's really one tempo.
"(un)pleasant" - don't know what time signature it is in but
sounds odd.
ah screw it most of them do..
if you want to listen:
eeeeee


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-16 21:40 [#00654122]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular



mharvefundp was oresome, it did seem kinda noisy and free in
structure.


 

offline Q4Z2X on 2003-04-16 21:43 [#00654125]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #00654122



thanks a lot.
my newer stuff is becoming more and more like that song and
less basic/loopy.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-16 21:56 [#00654150]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular



Oh yeah. This thread is gonna rock. I can tell. I have a
special feeling about this thread. I wish it
was 10 minutes from now already so I could read all the
interesting replies.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-04-17 02:59 [#00654425]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I'll do one.


 

offline WeaklingChild from Glasgow (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-17 03:33 [#00654466]
Points: 3354 Status: Lurker



i did it by accident once because i didnt set my loop point
properly when creating my drum track.


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2003-04-17 03:41 [#00654475]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular



im doing one now, but i dont think its gonna be nice


 

offline Tab from manchester (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-17 04:35 [#00654521]
Points: 374 Status: Regular



i'll do one later when i wake up some


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2003-04-17 05:41 [#00654619]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular



ok so i made this VERY SHORT piece in 6/8 signature... but i
dont find this to sound very strange or something.. maybe
ill expand this later

randInt - Tarantella.mp3



 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-04-17 09:15 [#00654912]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



i guess i'll try it when i get home

i've got so much on my musical plate right now, i'm gonna
need a fuckin buffet


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-17 12:42 [#00655215]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular



That was an excellent little track JAroen! It was more of a
specific structure than Q4z2x's. 6/8 means 8 groups of sixes
or something? I forget how that works.
Often, you hear drumb and bass people like squarepusher or
whatever, make music in 4/4 (well four groups of four is
what I mean) but then they often do brief sections where
they hit a percussion every THIRD or SIXTH row instead of
every fourth (while still retaining the global 4/4
structure). A good example is themesong to cex's drum beat.
But when you make something in some weird time signature,
you can make brief sections in (normal) 4/4 to get the same
effect or something. (I don't know what I'm talking about).


 

offline Clic on 2003-04-17 12:55 [#00655221]
Points: 5232 Status: Regular



sturgeon


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2003-04-17 13:06 [#00655234]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



i have a track that i made about 1 month ago. it will be on
an e.p. i am releasing soon. could i ftp it to someone or
mail it to someone to post? If not, no biggie.


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2003-04-17 13:12 [#00655242]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular | Followup to w M w: #00655215



i just set floops to 24 steps/ pattern and start making a
tune...
(normal 32 or 16 steps/pat = 4/4 so 24 or 12 makes 6/8 or
3/4)


 

offline ambsace from canaDUH. on 2003-04-17 13:43 [#00655277]
Points: 6326 Status: Lurker



w M w the first little bit of that track is really good.

i'm becoming quite the fan.


 

offline blrr from the block on 2003-04-17 13:54 [#00655290]
Points: 585 Status: Lurker



the reason 6/8 doesn't sound too odd is that you can
essentially break it into 2/4 or something. you can get a
pretty effective 6/8 feel in 4/4 by using triplets.
Sequencer seems to be crap at triplets though (unless i'm
missing something) I like triplets within othe triplets and
also I like even odder groups of 7 superimposed on groups of
8... rather like The Rite of Spring... but hard to do in a
sequencer. Using a 4/4 time sig and 'thinking' in 7/8 or
something can work well... you just have to think about it a
bit more. One of the movements of Tchaikowsyks' (sp?) 6th
symphony is a waltz, but it's in 5/4 (I think)... i like
that idea...quite odd.


 

offline blrr from the block on 2003-04-17 13:56 [#00655293]
Points: 585 Status: Lurker



oh yeah... good example of 4/4 sounding weird - 'Pyramid
Song' by Radiohead. it's all in 4/4 but finding a beat can
be quite tricky.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-17 14:35 [#00655337]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular



emu love- you can email it to me if it's under 1000 k
(hotmail), but it really would be the same amount of effort
to just put it up on zebox (instant access uploads)
cool you like it ambsace, people often seem to like my
simpler stuff.

If you have a pattern of 12 total steps, you have the option
to break the steps down into various sized units. For
example you can make it 3 groups of 4:
1234,1234,1234 = 12 total units
or you can make it 4 groups of 3:
123,123,123,123= 12 total units.

Odd numbers like 5,7,9,11 etc are the weirdest. I think I'll
make another one because I am soooooooo bored.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-17 14:36 [#00655339]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular



is this red?


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-17 15:21 [#00655394]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular



I guess I know one main reason for people commonly using
"4/4". Let's look at three possible composition structures.

2X2X2 (the normal one)
12,12

3X3X3
123,123,123

5x5X5
12345,12345,12345,12345,12345

7X7X7
1234567,1234567,1234567,1234567,1234567,1234567,1234567

(the reason is that the higher the number, the longer the
pattern must exponentially be, and the longer the harder to
comprehend as something that fits together in some logical
way)

so for example in the 5X5X5, a main melody loop would start
(the loop would begin) on every 5th group of 5.

And there you have it. Conclusion: I don't know what I'm
talking about.


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2003-04-17 15:31 [#00655405]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #00655394



hey, you're makinn these comps to fast. i'm still working on
my i click sound


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2003-04-17 15:34 [#00655407]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to w M w: #00655337



yeah, please e-mail me your addy so i can send it to you.
it's hard to explain, but if i post a link to it here, it
could invalidate my participation in the ae mix contest. my
e-mail is in my profile


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2003-04-17 16:21 [#00655464]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



actually i'll put it on zebox.
its bigger than 1000k


 

offline Polynomial-C from Netherlands, The on 2003-04-17 16:26 [#00655466]
Points: 1362 Status: Regular



Why don't you guys remix Aphex 51/13 Singles Collection and
convert all songs to 51/13....


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-17 16:59 [#00655522]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular | Followup to sadist: #00655405



Well these aren't produced with a teapot budget or
anything. They're only a compilation in the sense that they
are all in one thread. I'm still interested in hearing
tracks made with one click sound.


 

offline fat kaimo from Finland on 2003-04-17 17:08 [#00655533]
Points: 2003 Status: Lurker



i have a some songs in 'odd' signatures, but i think only
one is online... tunteja, shifting 5/8 and 6/8 mostly, but
it's kinda dull really..

if you're interested anyway:
www.fatkaimo.com
click: english-apokalyps-tunteja


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-17 17:31 [#00655575]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular



Okay, I made another, with an odd number again but this time
5 (five groups of five)

http://artists.iuma.com/IUMA/Bands/wmw/
"5x5x5"

I didn't spend much time on this either. but it does what I
talked about above a lot. (even though the main sound
strikes follow the rows of 5's, sometimes every THIRD or
FOURTH etc (something other than 5) is struck to make it
"squarepusherized" or whatever.
I'll listen to that one fat ass.


 

offline fat kaimo from Finland on 2003-04-17 17:38 [#00655587]
Points: 2003 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #00655575



cool M
i've downloaded some of your odd tracks but haven't listened
to them yet...


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2003-04-17 17:40 [#00655591]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to fat kaimo: #00655533



i like the album artwork for apokalyps.
listening to the track now...


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-17 17:43 [#00655593]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular



doh! I can't play this file type. BUT I must say I was
rather entertained by moving the mouse over the track
titles. Since each individual title slightly increases in
font size, together, they look like wiggly jello when you
move the cursor over them! WEeeee!!


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-17 17:45 [#00655597]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular



(you should get an iuma account. they let you have 10 songs
uploaded and it's instant access uploads, and they are
normal file types.)


 

offline fat kaimo from Finland on 2003-04-17 17:46 [#00655599]
Points: 2003 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #00655593



aw... you're on winamp?
here's a codec.


 

offline fat kaimo from Finland on 2003-04-17 17:48 [#00655605]
Points: 2003 Status: Lurker | Followup to evolume: #00655591



nice, but it's one of my least favourite's from the record
actually, just fit this thread...


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2003-04-17 19:10 [#00655882]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



here is my track, its called
anthill

it's going to be on my upcoming EP but under a different
artist name...


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-17 19:24 [#00655913]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular



ha ha, that made me larf. but I was just recovering from one
of those moods where everything that exists, or at least all
the data entering your senses seems completely rediculous. I
like it a lot, it sounds like a normal track, but then it
stumbles along with drum strikes in places you don't expect.


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2003-04-17 19:57 [#00655982]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular



i just finished making a track at school. it was pretty
messed up, it was a 4-4 beat in it sometimes, but most of it
its just noise and static. ill upload it somewhere soon so
peoples can hear it. keep in mind its my first forray into
electronic music since i discovered afx


 

offline ambsace from canaDUH. on 2003-04-18 01:10 [#00656293]
Points: 6326 Status: Lurker



well, team. i finally got something i'm willing to put up
here for your listening pleasure ...uh...ears. to
hear...right. and...listen to...right.

onesound.


 

offline ambsace from canaDUH. on 2003-04-18 01:14 [#00656296]
Points: 6326 Status: Lurker | Followup to ambsace: #00656293



HAH. and i just realized that this is the wrong thread. ah
well. but hey...it combines your last "compilation thread"
and your latest "compilation thread". so...uhm. yeah. ...and
stuff.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-18 12:51 [#00657172]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular



That was cool. These minimal "one sound" tracks are all sort
of... eerie. I like your other 2 tracks too, they sound like
incunabula or amberish. Please tell me how to make it so
letters get crossed out like that.


 

offline ambsace from canaDUH. on 2003-04-18 12:55 [#00657177]
Points: 6326 Status: Lurker



strikeout?

< s> words here < /s>

without the spaces between those...tag...thinger-dingers.
give 'er a try.

and thank you very much. that's quite the compliment seeing
as how i idolize ae and my favorite albums happen to be
incunabula and amber. i could kiss you. you big cutie...


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-18 13:00 [#00657188]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular



how many
others are
there? (bold= b italics= i underline= u
strikeout=s) how about red etc?



 

offline Q4Z2X on 2003-04-18 13:02 [#00657193]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker



does anyone else here not ever really think about these type
of things? i don't really even know how to read standard
musical notation anymore, or what the the different time
signatures are in my songs and evrything.
it seems like i end up writing songs with fucked up timing
kind of naturally, which can make it difficult to work with
other musicians sometimes


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-18 13:06 [#00657200]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular



000000000000000000
00
000000000000000000
0
000000000


 

offline ambsace from canaDUH. on 2003-04-18 13:16 [#00657218]
Points: 6326 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #00657200



you can't seem to use the 'font' tag with xltronic...so i
really have no idea. or maybe i'm just an idiot.


 

offline Tab from manchester (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-18 13:28 [#00657237]
Points: 374 Status: Regular



q4z2x >> im in the same boat, i havent a clue really, just
trial and error and using my ears (and software).



 

offline Q4Z2X on 2003-04-18 13:32 [#00657248]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker



yeah sometimes i just put a random number of beats to make
up one bar that repeats, and then try to make it work and
sound at least halfway natural.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-18 13:37 [#00657260]
Points: 21456 Status: Regular



There are all sorts of ways to do it. If you just choose a
random number of rows, like 46, and put sounds in there
fairly randomly, then that whole thing acts as one unit
since it doesn't have any sort of repetition inside it.
What I often like to do is have a fairly short beat, like 32
rows of random stuff, but then each time a new row of this
loop of 32 starts, there are slight mutations from the main
"prototype" of the original data.


 


Messageboard index