|
|
Refund
from Melbourne (Australia) on 2003-03-24 09:29 [#00613380]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker
|
|
thanks to Deviantart Winamp 2.9 beta 2
|
|
thethirdball
from Polly Pisspot (Canada) on 2003-03-24 09:34 [#00613392]
Points: 1629 Status: Lurker
|
|
I don't understand why no WinAmp3? Why do people love the 2.xx series so? Not being a smartass - actually want to know.
|
|
AlbertoBalsalm
from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2003-03-24 09:35 [#00613395]
Points: 9459 Status: Lurker
|
|
because it's slow
|
|
AlbertoBalsalm
from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2003-03-24 09:36 [#00613396]
Points: 9459 Status: Lurker
|
|
meaning winamp3
|
|
eXXailon
from purgatory on 2003-03-24 09:39 [#00613401]
Points: 6745 Status: Lurker
|
|
yeah....winamp 3 is muchmuch much slower than winamp 2...I prefer winamp 2.81 for that reason. only advantage winamp3 has is that its skins are nicer.
|
|
magiker
from Östersund (Sweden) on 2003-03-24 09:41 [#00613405]
Points: 865 Status: Lurker
|
|
Yeah, Winamp 3 sucks! I'm thinking of giving K-Jöfol another try.
|
|
Refund
from Melbourne (Australia) on 2003-03-24 13:39 [#00613638]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker
|
|
one of the posts in the deviant art link explains that this is nullsoft's attempts at reconciling with all the disgruntled winamp3 users, and will support things like winamp 3 skins in winamp 2, and has all of the more common winamp3 features without the hideous cpu overhead,..
|
|
AlbertoBalsalm
from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2003-03-24 14:13 [#00613687]
Points: 9459 Status: Lurker
|
|
well i can't use winamp3 skins with this new beta release, maybe the full vers.?
|
|
Messageboard index
|