|
|
Barrett, Syd
from T Dot on 2001-10-01 21:57 [#00038209]
|
|
For those high quality drukqs pics. Beats the thumbnails you got at Joyrex.
: )
|
|
diego
from belgium on 2001-10-02 00:39 [#00038236]
|
|
i hate to sound like some greedy record company, but I think it's bad to see these hi-quality scans already. I mean, to some people, the artwork is all that keeps them from downloading full albums in stead of buying them. Won't these hi-res scans of an album that is yet to appear, encourage (if only a few) people to download and not buy after all?
I'd say this isn't a great move if you're against piracy.
(Sorry for sounding like a moralist preacher here, but that's just what popped up in my mind here)
|
|
Chris Tucker
on 2001-10-02 01:18 [#00038237]
|
|
He denies access to the image index now, and the html and everything, when you try to look at the index it sends you back to the main area. I like looking at the images index on sites.
|
|
Phobiazero
from Sweden on 2001-10-02 07:02 [#00038302]
|
|
diego: Real fans will buy Drukqs, those who don't care, would prolly have downloaded it anyway, no matter whether the artworks are accessable or not.
The current poll results tells us the true story?
|
|
Messageboard index
|