|
|
IronLung
from the 91fwy in soCAL (United States) on 2003-03-07 15:55 [#00585351]
Points: 8032 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Sign me up i WANT IT IN MY HOUSE now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Speed Kills
|
|
DiaZoHeXagoN
from The city of angels (United States) on 2003-03-07 16:00 [#00585361]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker
|
|
damn I want that!
|
|
roygbivcore
from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2003-03-07 16:01 [#00585363]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker
|
|
HOLYSHIT
|
|
eXXailon
from purgatory on 2003-03-07 16:55 [#00585440]
Points: 6745 Status: Lurker
|
|
fuck O_o
I wonder what it's gonna cost right after it's been introduced on the market
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2003-03-07 16:59 [#00585442]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
That's nothing.
Heh, 8Gig IST links between cores. Yeah, oh yeah.
But for the distance, nice. But I still would like to know things such as protocol(if TCP then MTU sizes? max for TCP?)) how the routers handled these packets, the number of hops (which im sure WASN'T very many) and for 1 thing, there isn't much traffic on I2 (for now) so the router's cpu had it's priorityset on this test.
for the transatlantic cabling, well, heh, you know how that goes.
|
|
eXXailon
from purgatory on 2003-03-07 17:02 [#00585444]
Points: 6745 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #00585442
|
|
you spend too much time with the OSI model and Cisco courses ;) :-P
|
|
Duble0Syx
from Columbus, OH (United States) on 2003-03-07 17:03 [#00585445]
Points: 3436 Status: Lurker
|
|
I don't think an ISP could provide such service to multpiple people. I can't even imagine the equipment they would need to run such a thing. It would prolly be considerably slower for the public, but still would easily be 1,000 times faster than regular cable. Gimme Gimme Gimme!
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2003-03-07 17:04 [#00585446]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
i have never taken a neworking course or class in my life.
hell, have'nt really read a book either :/
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2003-03-07 19:57 [#00585561]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
it would be _considerably_ slower for the public, as there obviously wasn't many hops for this data to transfer over/through.
fiber is good, hell my longest fiber in my network is only 100ft long
heh unlike a couple KMs like @ w3rk
|
|
b0nk
from 1969 in the sunshine (United States) on 2003-03-07 20:04 [#00585565]
Points: 1121 Status: Regular
|
|
just think of the future, speeds are gonna be SICK
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2003-03-07 20:54 [#00585581]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
yeah i guess ... speeds are SICK right now. so
|
|
OK
on 2003-03-08 10:09 [#00586010]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker
|
|
i still use modem
|
|
J198
from Maastricht (Netherlands, The) on 2003-03-08 10:11 [#00586012]
Points: 7342 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
ok, so where the hell did they find this huge fiberoptic cable? was it just there? did it fall out of the sky? i dont get it. sounds like a pretty expensive experiment..
|
|
osiris
from Canterbury on 2003-10-04 16:32 [#00889450]
Points: 473 Status: Lurker
|
|
sounds interesting but the page is still downloading..heh
|
|
S M Pennyworth
from East Timor on 2003-10-04 16:46 [#00889466]
Points: 2196 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #00585442
|
|
lol@post
|
|
k_maty
on 2003-10-04 16:52 [#00889473]
Points: 2362 Status: Regular
|
|
cool
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2003-10-04 17:30 [#00889484]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
fiber is only 62.5MICRONs wide (for standard multi-mode fiber)
50Micron for single-mode (1 wavelength, high distances) common misconception that fiber is HUGE.
fiber is actually small as FUCK
|
|
mc_303_beatz
from Glasgow, Scotland on 2003-10-04 17:35 [#00889486]
Points: 3386 Status: Regular | Followup to elusive: #00889484
|
|
hey man remember fields trees, lochs and waterfalls. this shit ain`t real. relax and smell the fresh autumnal air as the breeze sifts by like a glider on a thermal....
|
|
Refund
from Melbourne (Australia) on 2003-10-04 17:51 [#00889495]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker
|
|
I actually saw this article I while ago, but I'm glad someone else brought it back up
|
|
xf
from Australia on 2003-10-04 21:08 [#00889510]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #00585442
|
|
Web100 is just one of the many proposed ways to solve this issue; yeah, current MTU's suck.
|
|
mappatazee
from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-10-04 21:43 [#00889511]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker
|
|
in 15 years we'll look back and laugh at this. whoa! dude! 6.2 gigabytes! amaaaazing!
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2003-10-04 21:44 [#00889512]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Nortel Network's dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) is the future.
....
|
|
mappatazee
from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-10-04 21:51 [#00889515]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #00889512
|
|
what in the holy hell is that?
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2003-10-04 22:02 [#00889518]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
http://www.iec.org/online/tutorials/dwdm/
|
|
xf
from Australia on 2003-10-04 22:27 [#00889525]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker
|
|
one of many futures, you mean.
brilliant thing about standards, is that there's so damn many to choose from, eh?
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2003-10-04 23:00 [#00889542]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
until mircosoft makes IP Internet Propriatary (IP)
heh im trying to make a funny.
|
|
xf
from Australia on 2003-10-04 23:43 [#00889546]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker
|
|
rofl lolz
|
|
oxygenfad
from www.oxygenfad.com (Canada) on 2003-10-05 02:11 [#00889571]
Points: 4442 Status: Regular
|
|
Right on! Now I can blow my load on time, and not before the picture has been loaded !
*Chews on a battery*
|
|
BlatantEcho
from All over (United States) on 2003-10-05 09:40 [#00889922]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker
|
|
as much as I understand the desire for faster and faster, I always thought it would be much easier on the infrustructure if we just found a way to make files a lot smaller.
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-10-05 09:46 [#00889928]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker
|
|
cool
|
|
pOgO
from behind your belly button fluff on 2003-10-05 09:47 [#00889931]
Points: 12687 Status: Lurker
|
|
Fucking A !
When do we get it?
|
|
Jedi Chris
on 2003-10-05 09:47 [#00889933]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to pOgO: #00889931
|
|
Ask your employer!
Hehehehe....then email me the costs! :P
|
|
Messageboard index
|