|
|
recycle
from need new aphex twin on 2001-09-21 20:00 [#00035247]
|
|
depending on weather you have or havent heard the album yet you prol havent seen teh artwork..............
its @ www.joyrex.com.......frontpage
i cant wait......................
|
|
orbit
on 2001-09-21 20:12 [#00035252]
|
|
why is song #29 listed twice???
|
|
recycle
from need new aphex twin on 2001-09-21 20:46 [#00035267]
|
|
orbit - good catch,im not quite sure any adeas?? richard does like to be funny ya know
|
|
Bilal
on 2001-09-21 20:50 [#00035268]
|
|
It's a fucking fake. Whoever made it just took a snapshot of the fucking Drukqs website for the cover.
|
|
Unabomber Type E
on 2001-09-21 20:52 [#00035269]
|
|
Joyrex would know a fake.
|
|
Bilal
on 2001-09-21 20:56 [#00035270]
|
|
Ye, I know a fucking fake when I see it. Joyrex must've been blind with excitement when he put it on his site.
|
|
`teapot.
from bwisbane on 2001-09-21 21:05 [#00035271]
|
|
the arts a bit boring and well..... quite shit. i reckon its fake.
|
|
Afterthought
from Chicago, usa on 2001-09-21 21:09 [#00035272]
|
|
i think it's real...the handwriting is the same as on ICBYD anyway...
|
|
Zebre
from Stockholm on 2001-09-21 21:11 [#00035273]
|
|
Unabomber Type E: Would he??? This has happen before.
|
|
recycle
from need new aphex twin on 2001-09-21 21:12 [#00035274]
|
|
bilal and teapot - dont you think that the copywrite sign helps to show that its real
its real
do peeps have so much time to make a cd and all of the inlays and "reproduce" afx handwritting (as stated above) ?
|
|
`teapot.
from bwisbane on 2001-09-21 21:14 [#00035275]
|
|
do peeps have so much time to make a song and claim that its aphex ?
|
|
recycle
from drukqs on 2001-09-21 22:01 [#00035279]
|
|
yes i think peeps do. this is a wonderful aphex twin page aside from all the crap that the peeps post over it. i am supporting afx and not the pessimism and shite on the board
(sorry for the speech)
|
|
Aaladorn
from Texas on 2001-09-21 23:21 [#00035296]
|
|
I'm 99.9999 percent sure that this is real, the photography is great in my opinion. Why the fuck would someone fake the artwork? And even if they were going to, why would they use such high-quality everything?
|
|
`teapot.
from bwisbane on 2001-09-22 00:40 [#00035313]
|
|
ok settle down, it probably is real... am i not allowed to express my doubts?
|
|
recycle
from harris labs on 2001-09-22 17:08 [#00035453]
|
|
yeah just think about it.......
|
|
Barrett, Syd
from T Dot on 2001-09-22 21:48 [#00035496]
|
|
Sweet tasty.
|
|
Barrett, Syd
from T Dot on 2001-09-22 21:51 [#00035497]
|
|
i wish they were bigger. gay that you can't save them.
|
|
Joyrex
from joyrex.com of course! on 2001-09-23 02:46 [#00035525]
|
|
a) They're real.., they came from the full release.
b) You can save them...if you're smart...but what for? You'll have the album in less than 30 days. Don't waste your time making labels for your MP3 downloads you burned to CDR from low-resolution images.
|
|
Barrett, Syd
from T Dot on 2001-09-23 05:03 [#00035547]
|
|
Well i guess I'm not smart. Do you have higher resolution pics of them Joyrex? I'd like them to save to add to my aphex pic collection, and i'd also like them for cd covers yes. I'm going to buy the vinyl (I buy all my electronic albums on it... Don't know why, just like it) and burn the cd. I don't have a ton of money to be buying both formats...
|
|
Aaladorn
from Texas on 2001-09-23 20:19 [#00035643]
|
|
Why do you need a cd cover for a stolen cd? Sorry, I don't comprehend.
|
|
bertie russell's productive constipation
from ssxx on 2001-09-23 20:48 [#00035646]
|
|
well, shouldn't we steel ourselves for possible disappointment? personally, i'm imagining the most incredible visual image ever... and if this is all rdj can come up with, i think i'll cry.
|
|
orbit
on 2001-09-23 21:05 [#00035652]
|
|
to save the pics, go here: http://www.joyrex.com/album_covers/albums/
look for the pics that says "drukqs" and click on them. when the pics loads, right click on it and select "Save Picture As..."
|
|
kaolin
on 2001-09-23 21:13 [#00035656]
|
|
btw, any thoughts on how cover art influences listening? does SAW1 sound like a 'black and white' record? does domineering cover art make it more difficult to hear sound as colour?
|
|
orbit
on 2001-09-23 21:26 [#00035657]
|
|
SAW1 sounds wonderfully colorful to me, but that's just my interpertation of it. personally, i think the covers are more of "attention grabbers" then anything else, although some artists may use them to help people interperate their music.
|
|
recycle
from harris labs on 2001-09-23 21:29 [#00035658]
|
|
i cant wait !!!!!!!!!!
|
|
Messageboard index
|