bombing afghanistan - video footage | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (6)
recycle
belb
Roger Wilco
DADONCK
Hyperflake
big
...and 343 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614314
Today 35
Topics 127557
  
 
Messageboard index
bombing afghanistan - video footage
 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-02-05 05:39 [#00541687]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



here


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-02-05 05:48 [#00541699]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



make sure your speakers are turned up..


 

offline C738 from Outer Space on 2003-02-05 05:49 [#00541700]
Points: 1722 Status: Regular



what about a working link?


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-02-05 05:53 [#00541708]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



that didn't work?

http://www.brookwoodfootball.org/ac130.cfm


 

offline X-tomatic from ze war room on 2003-02-05 06:11 [#00541736]
Points: 2901 Status: Lurker



That was plain sick. Those guys must think they're playing a
videogame.
What the hell is that footage doing on that site anyway. Do
the kids there enjoy watching that?


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-02-05 06:16 [#00541742]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



I don't know anything about the site that's hosting it. it
came to my attention thru the howard stern show this
morning. he called it the 'feel good movie of the season'...


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2003-02-05 06:21 [#00541750]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



I can't view it. Can someone describe it to me? I take it
that its footage of a bombing raid?


 

offline X-tomatic from ze war room on 2003-02-05 06:37 [#00541769]
Points: 2901 Status: Lurker



yeah, it shows an infrared film of a bombing raid, you see
lots of people running for their lives after heavy
explosions around a mosque, some guy saying "boom bang!"
everytime they got somebody. The crosshair follows people
running away from the bombscene and then they get smothered
in a rain of firy explosions. They are actually trying their
best to annihilate every single person at the scene,
spending at times up to 5 bombs on one running person. I
guess it's more easy to do when you're up in the air
watching it from a infrared video camera as it makes it all
look a bit more unreal, more like a videogame.


 

offline X-tomatic from ze war room on 2003-02-05 06:39 [#00541773]
Points: 2901 Status: Lurker



btw you just have to be patient, it takes a while to load.
First it loads a page with two pictures, one of the unmanned
plane, probably used for targeting, and the other one which
is supposed to be the actual bomber plane. On the bottom
left is where the vid will appear after a while.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2003-02-05 06:42 [#00541776]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to X-tomatic: #00541773



Cheers. I can't download the software to view as they put a
block on it here in work. Bastards!

But its totally real right?


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-02-05 07:06 [#00541796]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



yeah it's real.

did you notice how in the beginning they were given orders
not to "engage" the mosque and did a good job of avoiding it
until the firestorm at the end, when they finally decided,
hey, why shouldn't the mosque get blown the fuck up too? I
guess they got a little trigger-happy, trying to blow up
(literally) everything that moved, or tried desperately to
escape in a truck. it all seems a bit excessive until you
realize what this is in retaliation for


 

offline X-tomatic from ze war room on 2003-02-05 07:20 [#00541817]
Points: 2901 Status: Lurker



yeah that one guy was going BOOM BANG all the time. I guess
alot of US people will find this stuff gratifying which in
turn makes me sick to my stomach.
This footage combined with 9/11 clearly shows how little is
achieved by such actions, and how much is lost.



 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2003-02-05 07:27 [#00541826]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to theo himself: #00541796



"it all seems a bit excessive until you
realize what this is in retaliation for"

What do you mean?


 

offline X-tomatic from ze war room on 2003-02-05 08:26 [#00541897]
Points: 2901 Status: Lurker



so what do you mean theo?


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2003-02-05 08:34 [#00541912]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker | Followup to X-tomatic: #00541897



I think I know what he's getting at.


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2003-02-05 08:53 [#00541952]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular



okay time for some olde cutty and pasty

Some of the conventional weapons America used to support
the Northern Alliance during their advances on the Taliban
were so powerful that they are described by the Pentagon as
"near nuclear" weapons. They are as follows:
15,000-POUND FUEL AIR EXPLOSIVES (FAEs): In military jargon
these are referred to as "Daisy Cutters." The Foreign
Military Studies Office at Fort Leavenworth says "A fuel air
explosive can have the effect of a tactical nuclear weapon
without the radiation."7 There are many different varieties
of FAEs, but they typically consist of a container of fuel
and two separate explosive charges. Dropped by parachute
from a huge MC-130 Combat Talon plane, they detonate just
above the ground, creating a wide area of destruction.8 The
first explosion bursts the container at a predetermined
height, disbursing the fuel, which mixes with atmospheric
oxygen. The second charge then detonates this fuel-air
cloud, creating a massive blast that kills people and
destroys unreinforced buildings. Near the ignition point
peopleare obliterated, crushed to death with overpressures
of 427 pounds per square inch, and incinerated at
temperatures of 2500 to 5000 degrees centigrade. Another
wave of low pressure—a vacuum effect—then ensues. People
in the second zone of destruction are severely burned and
suffer massive internal organ injuries before they die. In
the third zone, eyes are extruded from their orbits, lungs
and ear drums rupture, and severe concussion ensues. The
fuel itself—ethylene oxide and propylene oxide—is highly
toxic." Up to 300 civilians died 20 miles away from the cave
complex in Afghanistan where Osama bin Laden was thought to
be hiding at Tora Bora when U.S. planes attacked. They
suffered blast trauma— ruptured lungs, blindness, arms and
hands blown off, almost certainly from FAEs




 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2003-02-05 08:54 [#00541955]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular



CLUSTER BOMBS: These have been used extensively in
Afghanistan by the U.S. Terrifying and deadly, each bomb is
composed of 202 bomblets, which are packed with razor-sharp
shrapnel dispersed at super-high speed over an area of 22
football fields, ripping into human bodies. These weapons
are prohibited by the Geneva Protocol." Civilians were
inevitably killed throughout Afghanistan by these illegal
and dreadful weapons. On one documented occasion, the U.S.
bombed a mosque in Jalabad during prayer and while neighbors
were digging out 17 victims, additional bombs killed more
than 120 people.'2
Historically, between 5 and 50 percent of these bomblets
fail to explode initially, lying around the countryside as
mines that explode with violent force if touched, tearing
their victims to pieces. Tragically, the bomblets are
colored yellow and shaped like a can of soft drink, and
therefore attractive to children.15 The food parcels
containing peanut butter, Pop Tarts, rice, and potatoes
dropped throughout Afghanistan by the U.S. are also yellow
and the same size and shape as the munitions. (Some of these
food drops themselves went astray, destroying houses and
killing more people.14) Human Rights Watch estimates that
over 5000 unexploded cluster bomblets may be littered across
Afghanistan, adding to the hundreds of thousands of mines
left after the Russian—American war of 1979 to 1989.'5
Afghanistan is currently the most heavily mined country in
the world



 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2003-02-05 08:56 [#00541960]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular



GUN SHIPS: These lumbering 6-150 planes built by Lockheed
Martin have been converted to airborne gunships, capable of
firing a fearsome array of weapons, inflicting the most
devastating damage, and leveling an area of several football
fields, with up to 2000 rounds per minute. They are armed
with 25mm Gattling guns, which fire 1800 rounds per minute;
4omm Bofors cannons, which fire 120 rounds per minute; and
io5rmn Howitzer cannons, which fire 8 to 10 rounds per
minute.'f) Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld said Afghanistan is
not a "target rich" area, and many analysts felt that these
attacks far exceeded their expectations. On October 22nd, in
the village of Chowkar-Karez, scores of civilians were mown
down by these gun-ships. CNN quoted an "unnamed" Pentagon
official as saying "The people are dead because we wanted
them dead." '7 Almost certainly, many civilians therefore
were wounded and killed. '"• '9
BUNKER BUSTERS: Dropped from B-i or B-2 planes, these
5000-pound behemoths are made from the gun barrels of
retired naval ships and are so heavy that they burrow 20 to
100 feet into the ground before their high explosive
materials detonate. Most are laser guided, but some use
Global Positioning satellites for guidance.20



 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2003-02-05 08:57 [#00541965]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular



CARPET BOMBING: This means dropping tons of bombs from B-52
planes at a 40,000-foot altitude: high enough to protect
pilots but too high to protect civilians. This is
indiscriminate bombing, and the pilots have no idea on whom
their bombs are landing. In 1969 carpet bombing used in
Cambodia by Kissinger and Nixon during the Vietnam War
induced the total destruction of the ancient irrigation
system and water supply and most of the rice-growing areas
of the country and, as a secondary effect, caused the
absolute disintegration of Cambodia's culture. The bombing
runs were called "breakfast," "lunch," and "supper."21


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2003-02-05 08:58 [#00541967]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular



just to let you know what ,what looks like a video game, is
actually doing


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2003-02-05 09:04 [#00541981]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker



Linnk is broken !?


 

offline X-tomatic from ze war room on 2003-02-05 09:11 [#00541991]
Points: 2901 Status: Lurker



I'm still curious as to what Theo was getting at.


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2003-02-05 09:15 [#00541997]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular | Followup to X-tomatic: #00541991



well NYPD and FDNY scrawled on bombs..does that ring a bell?


 

offline X-tomatic from ze war room on 2003-02-05 09:25 [#00542015]
Points: 2901 Status: Lurker



You don't get it. I know what he's aiming at but I'd like to
hear Theo himself explain it as it appears he's quite amused
by the imagery.


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2003-02-05 09:34 [#00542033]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular | Followup to X-tomatic: #00542015



I willing to cut him some slack..his reasoning is a bit
muddled sometimes..but I have read some major anti war rants
from him too so I know his heart's in the right place..


 

offline xian_ecci from los angeles on 2003-02-05 10:11 [#00542091]
Points: 251 Status: Regular | Followup to flea: #00541952



Brutal, yes.

Who doubts they would be used by the taliban if they had the
technology to use them?

flea, since its okay time for some pasties, lets not forget
to cite the olde cutty sources...
Let's keep free speech solid.



 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2003-02-05 10:24 [#00542104]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular | Followup to xian_ecci: #00542091



sorry..
The New Nuclear Danger by Dr. Helen Coldicott

*Who doubts they would be used by the taliban if they had
the
technology to use them?*

You are confusing Taliban with AlQaeda mistake easily made
since the propaganda of the media made certain that two
become indistinguishable..
If you mean that Taliban would be going on bombing raids in
America?Doubtful....Taliban's concerns were entirely
local..



 

offline xian_ecci from los angeles on 2003-02-05 10:53 [#00542131]
Points: 251 Status: Regular | Followup to flea: #00542104



i've heard her speak...i liked her- she's rough... she
equated drinking coke to consuming dirty water that helped
oppress millions.

'Taliban's concerns were entirely
local.. '

Predominantly Afghanistan? Yes.
Taliban in Pakistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia?
Bin Laden Is a Wahhabi, no?
with allies in Egypt, suicide bombers in Israel, in Syria
and Iraq, who openly promote violent acts.
where does local end?

I didn't see the footage- wasn't referning to any specific
incident.
U.S. is warlike, for sure. We are no different in that
respect, just better at it. Our system for oppression is
much more subtle and sugar-coated.

But the vibe of American 'evilness' that runs rampant on
this website is sometimes amusing. Are we really warlords,
conquering merely for booty?



 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-02-05 15:22 [#00542449]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to flea: #00541952



wow that sounds horrible.....

...the link wont work for me?
it doens't prompt me about software either..
...what program do i need?


 

offline X-tomatic from ze war room on 2003-02-05 15:46 [#00542471]
Points: 2901 Status: Lurker



America's reason for invading Iraq is laughable tho. Ooooh,
we found one warhead, let's invade this threat to the world!

Who has the world's biggest arsenal of wicked stuff, being
either biochemical, nuclear or conventional weaponry?
The one who's pointing the finger at others!


 

offline Asche XL on 2003-02-05 15:56 [#00542489]
Points: 4241 Status: Lurker



Here's what Bush has to say, click here.


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2003-02-05 19:27 [#00542736]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular | Followup to xian_ecci: #00542131



once again you are confusing Taliban with AlQaeda..

AlQaeda is the international terrorist ring..
Taliban is the previous Afghan govt.
Bin Laden is the leader of AlQaeda..not Taliban.
Mullah Omar is the leaderof Taliban and is NOT a member of
AlQaeda.


 

offline Red from Hell (New Zealand) on 2003-02-05 20:09 [#00542753]
Points: 378 Status: Addict



Want to see how propoganda works...and history is changed
with a few clicks of the button...I am reproducing a BBC
article dated 20th September about diplomatic efforts made
by the Taliban to the US...the same photo is used on both
articles...the contents of the article is changed totally,
read the article here then follow the link for the new
version...

BBC Thursday 20th September 2001
Taleban demand proof on Bin Laden


The Taleban call Bin Laden their guest
The leader of Afghanistan's Taleban regime has said Osama
Bin Laden - the chief suspect in the attacks on New York and
Washington last week - will not be extradited without
evidence.
We assure the whole world that neither Osama nor anyone
else can use Afghan territory against anyone

Mullah Mohammad Omar told hundreds of the country's Islamic
clerics that Bin Laden did not have the communications links
or resources to organise the attacks - and the US should
search for what he called the real culprits.
However, Mullah Omar also reportedly said he was ready to
hold talks with the US on the issue.
This offer was bluntly dismissed by the Americans. "The
president's message to the Taleban is very simple - it's
time for action not negotiations," White House spokesman Ari
Fleischer said.
Mullah Omar has accused Washington of using the allegations
against Bin Laden as a pretext to attack the Taleban.
The Americans have threatened to attack if the Taleban allow
him to remain in Afghanistan.

Mullah Mohammad Omar:We assure the whole world that neither
Osama nor anyone else can use Afghan territory against
anyone

The New Modified Version



 

offline Red from Hell (New Zealand) on 2003-02-05 20:17 [#00542759]
Points: 378 Status: Addict



href"http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1550366.st



 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-02-06 00:46 [#00542846]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



x-tomatic, what do you want to know exactly?


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2003-02-06 01:50 [#00542861]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to theo himself: #00542846



What we wnat to know is what you meant by this ?

"it all seems a bit excessive until you
realize what this is in retaliation for"


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-02-06 06:36 [#00543142]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



howard stern is the leading radio dj in all us markets
including 15 major cities. he advertised that website (which
I'm guessing is too small to handle heavy traffic) and it
became too overrun to keep up.. I think it might've been
shut down.. if u didn't see it, here's another link:

click here
http://www.military.com/newscontent?file=fl_video_121802

or here
http://vampirebat.com/obeythefist


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-02-06 06:37 [#00543143]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



"it all seems a bit excessive until you
realize what this is in retaliation for"

some of you might remember a little sucker-punch thrown in
the direction of a few thousand new yorkers in october of
2001. ..or maybe it was september.. wait, yeah. it was
september.. the 10th I believe, though I could be wrong..
wait no that sounds off... hmm.. september 11th? yeah that
rings a bell.. 9/11 right.. it was september 11th. and I
think I remember two major US cities being attacked, the
epicenter of world commerce and finance being reduced to
dust and and some military complex that was the stronghold
of military intelligence for our country.. I think it's
called the hexagon or something like that.. I don't remember
though, it wasn't that big of a news story.

this bombing was part of a war effort. the targets of it
were soldiers part of an organization whose objective was to
end the lives of americans simply for being american, and
destroy the societal foundation of america. this is what
happens in war, you kill or be killed. in this case, we were
killing and the afghanis were being killed. we were bombing
our enemies, not civilians. this was done in retaliation for
them killing american civilians whom they regarded as
non-believers/infidels/devils simply for owning an SUV and a
nokia.

and I dont know what flea means by reasoning being
'muddled.' my reasoning is never confused/unclear. this is a
text-only forum so I can see my POSTS sometimes coming off a
bit vague or maybe even confusing, but never the reasoning
behind them. what does get muddled may be one's
interpretation of what I say, not my reasoning.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2003-02-06 06:41 [#00543147]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to theo himself: #00543143



Oh Christ. Do we have to go through this again?

The War on Terror was not a response to 9/11; the attacks on
the WTC were not because they hate Americans for no reason;
the US/UK killed more people than the 9/11...

Stop swallowing your governments propaganda and WAKE UP!


 

offline Peter File from the future!!! Ooooh chase me! on 2003-02-06 06:45 [#00543153]
Points: 2020 Status: Lurker



"this bombing was part of a war effort. the targets of it
were soldiers part of an organization whose objective was to

end the lives of americans simply for being american"

No. The soldiers were part of an organisation whose
objective was to defend their country against an attack that
was being launched on them simply for refusing to hand over
Bin Laden without being presented with any evidence of his
involvement in the WTC/Pentagon attacks.


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-02-06 07:20 [#00543191]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



yeah. "the soldiers were part of an organization whose
objective was to defend their country against an attack that
was being launched on them after they..." ATTACKED america,
or knew of the attack, or helped orchestrate the attack.
they didn't hand over bin laden (and were protecting him)
after it was known the world over that he had everything to
do with the 9/11 attack. this was after bin laden was seen
on tape exclaiming his shock at how devastating the attacks
actually were because, based on "test runs" it was estimated
that the buildings wouldn't collapse

either way, the possibilty that bin laden's involvement was
unconfirmed at the time of those retaliatory bombings is
completely irrelevant. the truth is he WAS involved in every
way. so why are you sympathizing with these fucking people
like they're mother theresas with turbans and prayer rugs

there wouldn't be a "war on terror" (which, as david cross
pointed out, is like having a "war on jealousy") if there
wasnt 9/11. and if it wasnt september 11th, 2001 but rather
april 3rd, 2005, there would be a "war on terror" soon to
follow. no question. 9/11 was the catalyst for the war on
terror and that's the end of that.

yes the us have killed more people than we lost in 9/11, but
that is because we've been involved in more wars defending
ourselves AND EVERY OTHER COUNTRY LOOKING FOR HAND-OUTS FROM
US, so our kill total would HAVE to be higher than most
other countries.. furthermore, given that these were done in
the defense of others, or ourselves, it's far more
justifiable than killing because of a brainwashed, blind
adherence to religious dogma

and jonesy, don't insult me. stop swallowing my government's
propaganda!!? why don't you swallow my dick and a cumshot.
I'm the last person to buy into american propaganda,
especially this year's, which can be likened to high school
'he-said, she-said' gossip. why don't you stop FORCING
consistant anti-american propaganda. it's sad, really. are
you saying we should have just l


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-02-06 07:20 [#00543192]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



...should have just layed down after they took out the trade
center? what the fuck do you expect us to do?!!.. we did
what we had to, got the taliban and al-queda out of there,
and they now have a better, (I didnt say GOOD) BETTER
situation then before,.. and some pop tarts.

is this what I should anticipate by starting a thread like
this? constant feeble bad-mouthing of america at every
turn?

"the attacks on the WTC were not because they hate Americans
for no GOOD reason" ..is that what you meant?

and when did I ever say I was "amused by the imagery"? I was
simply detailing what was shown in that video to those who
couldnt view it.. I never said any "I like the way..." or
"isn't it AWESOME when..." kind of statements.. so I dont
know what you're talking about


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2003-02-06 07:28 [#00543206]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to theo himself: #00543191



1. The Taliban offered to hand Bin Laden over to be tried in
a court. the US said "no, we're gonna bomb you"

2. An invasion/bombing campaign in Afghanistan was planned
BEFORE 9/11

3. You show yourself to be deeply ignorant of the facts, and
islamaphobic to boot.

4. I'd suck your dick if it wasn't up your daddy's 24/7


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2003-02-06 07:31 [#00543210]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to theo himself: #00543192



Quite why we're supposed to have unlimited sympathy for the
9/11 victims and joy at the US' murder rate of those abroad
is quite beyond me. It stinks of racism.


 

offline broken phillip on 2003-02-06 07:38 [#00543217]
Points: 828 Status: Lurker



yeah i saw that footage on stileproject a month or so back..
was a little extream..

GNN has some great media cutup movies and they
have some old E.B.N. movies too : )

S-11 Redux:
(Channel) Surfing the Apocalypse


"It is a well-known and widely accepted fact that, during
wartime, news companies and governmental representatives
fuse their voices together into one univocal beam of support
for the national military objective. And, while, for many,
this is a vital aspect of institutional patriotism, it is
also a very dangerous and troubling reality. For, if the
news media have abandoned their responsibility to
objectively inform the population, then our concept of a
democracy (which is founded on the ability for all citizens
to choose their nation's destiny based on a full spectrum of
information) is in desperate peril.

But imagine a mediascape in which politicians actually said
what they meant and meant what they said. One where the
talking heads on broadcast news actually challenged the
powerful interests in Washington not with fangless
sensationalism, but with insightful deconstructions of true
power and its manipulations.

We can't.

At least, not in the current corporate controlled
environment of media ownership. And especially not with the
so-called War on Terrorism and its burgeoning McCarthyistic
clampdown on open displays of dissent."

So, in the face of our media's shameless propaganda
campaign, we have taken it upon ourselves to intuit what the
intentions and goals of this war truly are. In what is
surely a departure from our traditional NewsVideo format,
GNN presents S-11 Redux: (Channel) Surfing the Apocalypse.
Culled from over 20 hours of television footage recorded
over a one month period and across 13 networks, S-11 Redux
is a sound-bite blitzkrieg that challenges the messages we
have been fed from our mainstream media and


 

offline broken phillip on 2003-02-06 07:41 [#00543220]
Points: 828 Status: Lurker



So, in the face of our media's shameless propaganda
campaign, we have taken it upon ourselves to intuit what the
intentions and goals of this war truly are. In what is
surely a departure from our traditional NewsVideo format,
GNN presents S-11 Redux: (Channel) Surfing the Apocalypse.
Culled from over 20 hours of television footage recorded
over a one month period and across 13 networks, S-11 Redux
is a sound-bite blitzkrieg that challenges the messages we
have been fed from our mainstream media and the government
it serves. Be warned - this video moves quickly and will
require at least two viewings to digest its full impact. You
may never be able to look at S-11 and its post-impact
coverage the same way, ever again.



 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-02-06 08:10 [#00543253]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



that's it. when you have unfounded information to counter an
argument, it's probably better to resort to calling someone
a racist (!?) and an islamaphobe- you fucking idiot.
what, other than nothing, gave my supposed 'islamaphobia'
away? I'm not against the "religious dogma" of islam, but
rather the damaging effects following it so strictly, like
the radical fundamentalists involved w/9/11..

and who said anything about being proud of a kill rate for
the US? I was merely explaining it is justifiable,
proportionally, in times of war. guess what: no one lays
down in war, they fight. and when we fight, people die.
that's how it works.


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-02-06 08:18 [#00543260]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



"The Taliban offered to hand Bin Laden over to be tried in
a court. the US said 'no, we're gonna bomb you'" REALLY? it
was just that simple, huh?

you don't know what you're talking about. sorry, but you
dont. you're an authority on nothing, and you're more
ignorant than the people you're calling ignorant.

I am against the american call for sympathy. especially when
those being asked to be sympathetic have been through so
much more, and much more frequently. it's almost like the
someone crying to a person s/he just ran over about the
damage the accident caused to his/her mercedes.



 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2003-02-06 14:50 [#00543837]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular



my bad...
theo's resoning is not muddled at all..
it has been sharpened to a razors edge of ignorance by a
regular intake of American media's stupid pills...

I am not about to go back and debate the Whitehouse's by
line with him..I have done that here till I have been blue
in the in the face and just reading him spout his total lack
of a view point other than that fed to him by
ABCCBSNBCCNNFOXPBS my face's gone all blue again


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2003-02-06 18:01 [#00544049]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i can host many more of these videos if you want


 


Messageboard index