|
|
C738
from Outer Space on 2003-01-27 15:29 [#00530580]
Points: 1722 Status: Regular
|
|
Hi all!
Does anyone have any experience with shoutcasting their music / dj-ing?
I'm trying to figure out how I can shoutcast my muic into cyberspace.
It worked thru netmeeting already.
|
|
Inverted Whale
from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2003-01-27 15:40 [#00530592]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker
|
|
I've set up streaming servers before. I've used icecast, peercast, and shoutcast (mostly on Unix systems). What do you need to know?
|
|
C738
from Outer Space on 2003-01-27 15:41 [#00530594]
Points: 1722 Status: Regular
|
|
I need to know how I can use my 64kbit/s bandwith to get my music to a server on internet, which will stream it fo me.
I've seen the softwaer at shoutcast.com.
Are there any alternatives?
|
|
Inverted Whale
from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2003-01-27 15:46 [#00530598]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker
|
|
You've got a pretty small pipe. Streaming can take up a lot of bandwidth quick. peercast is interesting because other computers can help share the load if your stream becomes popular.
live365 is a relatively cheap way to stream. They provide all the bandwidth, you upload mp3s to them or provide a feed from your own computer that they mirror to the rest of the world.
|
|
C738
from Outer Space on 2003-01-27 15:47 [#00530604]
Points: 1722 Status: Regular
|
|
hmmm. due to no budget it has to be free or cheaper...
|
|
Inverted Whale
from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2003-01-27 15:56 [#00530618]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker
|
|
With that sort of bandwidth it's really not realistic to do the streaming yourself, so I'd take a look at Peercast - unless you are talking about a really low quality stream and maybe a dozen simultaneous listeners. Then shoutcast would probably do the trick.
Shoutcast is a little easier to set up and use, but that's just because it's been around a lot longer than peercast.
|
|
Messageboard index
|