|
|
RobE
from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-01-24 06:51 [#00526479]
Points: 1608 Status: Regular
|
|
Anyone here used/using this web design package?
Thx.};>
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-01-24 07:38 [#00526519]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to RobE: #00526479 | Show recordbag
|
|
One of my flatmates does, why what do you want to know?
|
|
RobE
from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-01-24 07:54 [#00526568]
Points: 1608 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #00526519
|
|
Heard it was one of the best.
Thinking of purchasing as i'm finished using the basic stuff.
Just wanted opinions (ie.ease of use,the results obtained etc).
Am about to d/l the trial from Macromedia.
Thx again.
};>
|
|
danbrusca
from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-01-24 07:55 [#00526572]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to RobE: #00526568
|
|
I haven't looked at DWMX, DW4 suits me just fine so there's no need to upgrade.
|
|
Loopz
from Brum Land on 2003-01-24 08:05 [#00526591]
Points: 526 Status: Regular
|
|
same as danbrusca really. Ive used DWMX but there was nothing new in there that i would use. i think you can download a demo from the website - try before you buy
|
|
Paco
from Gothenburg (Sweden) on 2003-01-24 08:15 [#00526619]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker
|
|
The extended demo is available on Kazaa.
-P
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-01-24 08:56 [#00526679]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
My flatmate says that it's very intuitive and you can get professional looking results in a comparatively short space of time. I've not used it myself though...
|
|
diablo
on 2003-01-24 08:58 [#00526685]
Points: 3242 Status: Lurker
|
|
I use dreamweaver but I havent got MX. I think its really good. Never had problems with it. New versions have automatic search engine submission i think so that would be very useful
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2003-01-24 09:01 [#00526688]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
|
|
If you are going to be doing a lot of web design Dreamweaver MX is by far the best app out there in my opinion. You'll get heated debates over hand coding HTML vs. using a WYSIWYG tool, but Dreamweaver combines those almost seamlessly.
MX is a pretty substatial upgrade from DW 4, because it added the code formating awesomeness of HomeSite to the mix and added the backend scripting features of UltraDev.
Plus, one of my definate favorite things is the tabbed tool bars. speeds up workflow like a motherfucker.
doing what I do now, I spend a whole lot of time in the code view, but, for laying out tables and forms I use the design view and I just don't think any hand coder out there could keep up with that method of page layout.
summary: go Dreamweaver MX.
my $.02
|
|
C738
from Outer Space on 2003-01-24 09:02 [#00526691]
Points: 1722 Status: Regular
|
|
I havent used it, but if it is about the same as flash mx, concerning quality and logical structure of the menus etc. I'd say it should be nice.
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2003-01-24 09:05 [#00526698]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
|
|
every product in the Studio MX package has the same menu/palatte structure (except freehand). They're very good... you can pretty much chose to layout your menus how you want to.
|
|
Joyrex
from watmm.com (United States) on 2003-01-24 09:22 [#00526738]
Points: 1389 Status: Lurker
|
|
DWMX is much better than 4 IMO... the interface is much better, and they fixed a huge amount of bugs that were in DW4.
I use it for all my web coding...love it!
|
|
Messageboard index
|