|
|
nacmat
on 2002-12-11 07:33 [#00477471]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa016/fa016e7c61905b79c7ca60871500da77eebe1077" alt=""
|
is there any other program better than this one to listen to my mp3 and audio cds?
I am tired of it cos its always making mistakes
|
|
Ophecks
from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-12-11 07:37 [#00477476]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e95e/7e95e6b62615ffca9cff627b1674c1a2f2889015" alt=""
|
Winamp
Winamp is what I swear by. Tons of skins and plug ins and all around awesomeness. Preferably NOT Winamp 3, I've heard it's not as good as Winamp 2...
My current skin is:
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
recycle
from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2002-12-11 07:43 [#00477480]
Points: 40265 Status: Addict
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/403a2/403a2953a6444ccd92b8ca5e5ca9921694428f6b" alt=""
|
beatles of course !!
|
|
Ophecks
from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-12-11 07:51 [#00477490]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e95e/7e95e6b62615ffca9cff627b1674c1a2f2889015" alt=""
|
All the Aphex Twin skins suck horribly, totally unusable.
This one's brilliant, though. For all you Metroid geeks.
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
nacmat
on 2002-12-11 07:55 [#00477495]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa016/fa016e7c61905b79c7ca60871500da77eebe1077" alt=""
|
my problem is that with windows media sometimes the pc falls down... it just dies and I have to reset... is that due to something apart from some mistake in my media player?
|
|
Ophecks
from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-12-11 08:01 [#00477503]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Followup to nacmat: #00477495 | Show recordbag
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e95e/7e95e6b62615ffca9cff627b1674c1a2f2889015" alt=""
|
That happens to me sometimes with other music programs. It's best to use Winamp, much easier to use, and WMPlayer seems to take up more CPU power... and it just sucks. Too many useless features weighing it down.
|
|
Dolleater
from Afrika Bambaataa on 2002-12-11 08:04 [#00477506]
Points: 4819 Status: Addict
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa016/fa016e7c61905b79c7ca60871500da77eebe1077" alt=""
|
Have a Winamp skin editor but its two hard to figure out, someone make a xltronic skin, with my avatart in it. :)
|
|
nacmat
on 2002-12-11 08:08 [#00477509]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ophecks: #00477503
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa016/fa016e7c61905b79c7ca60871500da77eebe1077" alt=""
|
thanks ophecks
|
|
recycle
from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2002-12-11 08:09 [#00477510]
Points: 40265 Status: Addict
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/403a2/403a2953a6444ccd92b8ca5e5ca9921694428f6b" alt=""
|
Ophecks --show the aphex twin skin if ya can.........
|
|
Ophecks
from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-12-11 08:25 [#00477523]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e95e/7e95e6b62615ffca9cff627b1674c1a2f2889015" alt=""
|
Here's an example of one. There's 12 Aphex skins there, they all suck, you can barely make out the buttons.
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
Ophecks
from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-12-11 08:26 [#00477524]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e95e/7e95e6b62615ffca9cff627b1674c1a2f2889015" alt=""
|
And there's only ONE Autechre skin... a bit better than the Aphex skin, but still pretty ugly and user-unfriendly.
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
Joyrex
from watmm.com (United States) on 2002-12-11 09:57 [#00477595]
Points: 1389 Status: Lurker
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa016/fa016e7c61905b79c7ca60871500da77eebe1077" alt=""
|
I personally like Windows Media Player...version 9 (the newest one) is the best yet. True, it is a memory hog, but I have few problems with it's stability.
The new WMA9 format is loads better than MP3, almost a third smaller file sizes, and better quality at lower bitrates.
|
|
Inverted Whale
from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2002-12-11 14:33 [#00477839]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa016/fa016e7c61905b79c7ca60871500da77eebe1077" alt=""
|
"better quality at lower bitrates" - this is true of practically every newer, more technically advanced codec introduced since mp3 (ogg vorbis, musepack, AAC), but does it mean that Windows media is "loads better"? Nope.
|
|
Joyrex
from watmm.com (United States) on 2002-12-11 14:42 [#00477850]
Points: 1389 Status: Lurker
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa016/fa016e7c61905b79c7ca60871500da77eebe1077" alt=""
|
It is when you have hundreds of CDs digitally captured on your PC and it takes up 23GB with wma rather than 60GB with MP3 :)
MP3 is good for convenience, but for personal use, WMA suits me fine.
Plus, WMP9's new playlist features are neat - you can generate playlists based on a number of criteria.
Doesn't really matter - whatever is best for you is what's important.
|
|
Inverted Whale
from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2002-12-11 14:54 [#00477861]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa016/fa016e7c61905b79c7ca60871500da77eebe1077" alt=""
|
Hopefully Windows Media 9 has improved the high-frequency cutoff that was in 8. You might be in for a surprise if you ever try to play your files on a decent stereo system (or any 64 Kbps codec for that matter).
|
|
bryce_berny
from chronno (Canada) on 2002-12-11 15:01 [#00477868]
Points: 1568 Status: Lurker
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa016/fa016e7c61905b79c7ca60871500da77eebe1077" alt=""
|
lossless compression is getting better these days as well, hopefully sometime soon we wont have to re-archive our music selection every couple years
|
|
TonePu5her
from lincoln !UK! (United Kingdom) on 2002-12-11 15:02 [#00477869]
Points: 3640 Status: Regular
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa016/fa016e7c61905b79c7ca60871500da77eebe1077" alt=""
|
Amen to that. After that problem I've never looked at Mw format again,God bless Winamp3(not 2)
|
|
titsworth
from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-12-11 15:05 [#00477873]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa016/fa016e7c61905b79c7ca60871500da77eebe1077" alt=""
|
my friend swears by ogg, do any of you agree it's the best?
|
|
neetta
from Finland on 2002-12-11 15:11 [#00477886]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa016/fa016e7c61905b79c7ca60871500da77eebe1077" alt=""
|
quite many people swear on ogg. i don't notice real difference but i believe.
|
|
bryce_berny
from chronno (Canada) on 2002-12-11 15:15 [#00477893]
Points: 1568 Status: Lurker
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa016/fa016e7c61905b79c7ca60871500da77eebe1077" alt=""
|
Ogg is very very good, but I still think that lossless is the answer, we're talking about overall quality gains that range from a fraction of a percent to 1 or 2 percent with each "revised" lossy compression format. Im going to keep using lame vbr until a deadly lossless comes out, monkeys audio is getting pretty good-seems to cut most files at least in half
|
|
Inverted Whale
from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2002-12-11 15:29 [#00477907]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00477873
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa016/fa016e7c61905b79c7ca60871500da77eebe1077" alt=""
|
I don't think ogg is the best at anything - except for its licensing requirements (none).
But it is not bad and should continue to improve and get more support.
|
|
Messageboard index
|