|
|
Vit C
from Glasgow (United Kingdom) on 2002-09-01 21:47 [#00374757]
Points: 866 Status: Regular
|
|
Anyone seen, what did you think?
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2002-09-01 21:48 [#00374759]
Points: 24579 Status: Lurker | Followup to Vit C: #00374757
|
|
Masterpiece
|
|
TonyFish
from the realm of our dreams on 2002-09-01 21:50 [#00374761]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker
|
|
Nope. However the photography was stunning. As for the content, I would be interested to see how the film would have turned out had Kubrick lived to finish editing it, but as far as I'm concerned twas pretty poor.
|
|
Conformist
from Powell, OH (United States) on 2002-09-01 21:51 [#00374762]
Points: 550 Status: Lurker
|
|
I agree with TonyFish. very surreal imagery, but the movie itself was lacking. certainly not one of Kubrick's bests, if you ask me.
|
|
Sido Dyas
from a computer on 2002-09-01 21:52 [#00374765]
Points: 8876 Status: Lurker
|
|
And i to agree with Tonyfish!
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2002-09-01 21:54 [#00374767]
Points: 24579 Status: Lurker
|
|
I found this interesting site for you Vit C
|
|
TonyFish
from the realm of our dreams on 2002-09-01 21:56 [#00374771]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker
|
|
The orgy scene was amazing! Heh I know what you're thinking but I actually mean the bit before with the circle of masked people. Wow !
|
|
Sido Dyas
from a computer on 2002-09-01 21:59 [#00374775]
Points: 8876 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #00374767
|
|
Hey thats a great link!!
|
|
TonyFish
from the realm of our dreams on 2002-09-01 22:00 [#00374779]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker
|
|
Interesting article on EWS: linkey
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2002-09-01 22:03 [#00374784]
Points: 24579 Status: Lurker | Followup to TonyFish: #00374779
|
|
Jung is one of my favourite thinkers - I didn't know that site existed, so thanks for turning me on to it
|
|
TonyFish
from the realm of our dreams on 2002-09-01 22:10 [#00374796]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker
|
|
Loads of film reviews amongst loads of tasty stuff but a word of warning not all the reviews are good. The Requiem for a dream and Pi one's are though.
|
|
mccabe
from fuck knows .......I`m lost !!! on 2002-09-01 23:02 [#00374872]
Points: 908 Status: Lurker
|
|
I only ever seen it at the cinema ,never felt inclined to watch it again,but I thought it was a brilliant film.
The last line sums it up pretty much.......how does it go....."so lets go back home and fuck"...hehe,something like that.
|
|
Asche XL
on 2002-09-01 23:13 [#00374888]
Points: 4241 Status: Lurker
|
|
Can someone explain the point of the movie? I was really confused watching it.
|
|
mccabe
from fuck knows .......I`m lost !!! on 2002-09-01 23:15 [#00374892]
Points: 908 Status: Lurker | Followup to Asche XL: #00374888
|
|
It would take to long to explain,so think about the last line,and the rest of the movie.
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2002-09-01 23:17 [#00374895]
Points: 24579 Status: Lurker | Followup to Asche XL: #00374888
|
|
Asche, check out either the link I posted earlier in the thread, or the one Tony posted
|
|
steve mcqueen
from caerdydd (United Kingdom) on 2002-09-01 23:29 [#00374911]
Points: 6531 Status: Addict
|
|
that girls whos the tailors daughter used to give me wet dreams when i was like 17.
|
|
CORTEX
from Canada on 2002-09-01 23:30 [#00374913]
Points: 3346 Status: Regular | Followup to Asche XL: #00374888
|
|
from what i understand, the film shows you the diverse form of sexuality (orgy, prostitute, indidelity, child/adolescent, threesome, while under the influence of drugs...). the story itself wasnt mindblowing, but the broader story was excellent i thought.
that's what i got from it, not the official interpretation though.
|
|
steve mcqueen
from caerdydd (United Kingdom) on 2002-09-01 23:34 [#00374917]
Points: 6531 Status: Addict
|
|
fuck the film, that tailors daughter was fucking mint.
|
|
hedphelym
from Montreal (Canada) on 2002-09-02 18:47 [#00375868]
Points: 749 Status: Addict
|
|
he's not a tailor! He's a costume shop owner!
I didn't expect much from it going into the film (it was the 2nd film of a double feature, I decided to stick around), but was very pleasantly surprised, it is quite good!
|
|
titsworth
from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-09-02 19:36 [#00375958]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker
|
|
i thought this film was "good" (not great or excellent, but above average). not kubrick's best but still an interesting film with good acting. touches on some sexual topics that few movies will delve into.
|
|
titsworth
from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-09-02 19:37 [#00375961]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker
|
|
and yea the imagery is sublime!
|
|
Zombiekev
from Ardmore (United States) on 2002-09-02 19:46 [#00375971]
Points: 2857 Status: Lurker
|
|
it was no paths of glory
|
|
USACID
from Death Valley (Zambia) on 2002-09-03 04:47 [#00376425]
Points: 788 Status: Lurker
|
|
it was weird, good, bad....sorry to see Kubrick died a few weeks/days before finishing the editting....if only he coulda been around to fix the mistakes made with AI.
|
|
Ubik
from United States on 2002-09-03 05:03 [#00376445]
Points: 662 Status: Lurker
|
|
i thought Eyes Wide Shut was flawed but interesting, good and bad... but visually artistic, like all his movies, and while i didn't really think Cruise and Kidman were appropiate, Cruise does play selfish smugness well. the movie makes you think, even if you don't agree with some things... i compared it with American Beauty that came out the around the same time, but i think that Eyes Wide Shut is more interesting.
|
|
Messageboard index
|