|
|
Asche XL
on 2002-08-30 06:31 [#00372205]
Points: 4241 Status: Lurker
|
|
Ok....I heard there are no song names for any of the songs on this album and all the song names were made by the fans from figuring out the pictures and symbols. But howcome when you dl an mp3 and stuff there are a set list of song names. Who decided on these names? You know what I mean?
|
|
electro
from detroit on 2002-08-30 06:33 [#00372207]
Points: 2880 Status: Regular
|
|
yes..i guess somebody named the songs and it got on
it is one of those things that you just believe in and do not question
|
|
Duble0Syx
from Columbus, OH (United States) on 2002-08-30 06:34 [#00372209]
Points: 3436 Status: Lurker
|
|
The names are whats in the pictures. That and when I stuck the cd in my computer those are the names it looked up on the net...
|
|
Asche XL
on 2002-08-30 06:35 [#00372210]
Points: 4241 Status: Lurker
|
|
Ok but how did these names become official ( or unofficial for that matter) ? I don't understand this. It's bugging me for some reason.
|
|
Duble0Syx
from Columbus, OH (United States) on 2002-08-30 06:37 [#00372213]
Points: 3436 Status: Lurker
|
|
Check the FAQ. I'd say because of napster. How are you going to find and Download 25 untitled tracks? Names made it easier. That and the names are what is in the pictures...So it makes sense...
|
|
Asche XL
on 2002-08-30 06:40 [#00372215]
Points: 4241 Status: Lurker
|
|
Yeah, but ... you could just be like disc 1 track 1
;)
I wonder if Phobia would know. Who or what made the tracklisting official.
Thanks to all who read this thread.
|
|
Duble0Syx
from Columbus, OH (United States) on 2002-08-30 06:44 [#00372221]
Points: 3436 Status: Lurker
|
|
As I said, I'm pretty sure it became official when all the pictures were identified with the appropraite track. Someone told someone else. It made sense to them, and sense they didn't feel like questioning it, they just agreed...Thats proly all there is to it. I could easily be wrong though...
|
|
pachi
from yo momma (United States) on 2002-08-30 06:49 [#00372225]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker
|
|
w/o the aid of the internet i'm guessing u need to be in some kind of meditative or subconscious state to decipher it =/
|
|
DaWeeze
from WANTED IN 16 STATES! on 2002-08-30 06:51 [#00372227]
Points: 5213 Status: Addict
|
|
http://www.aphextwin.nu/learn/98491895499398.shtml
|
|
Asche XL
on 2002-08-30 06:56 [#00372234]
Points: 4241 Status: Lurker
|
|
It's like how many licks does it take to get to the tootsie roll center or a tootsie pop. The world may never know. Thanks for the link DaWeeze so it will continue to remain a mystery of how the names got started but I'll just be a good little lad and accept them for what they are. Thanks all. Goodnight
|
|
LeCoeur
from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2002-08-30 07:01 [#00372241]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker | Followup to Asche XL: #00372234
|
|
hahah
i know how many licks it takes.....and i'll NEVER tell!!
however the names are officially the unofficial names. and i agree with 006 they had to put a track listing out there so it stuck.
if you find out differently let us know.
SAW II is the first Aphex CD i purchased 2 1/2 years ago =0)
|
|
DaWeeze
from WANTED IN 16 STATES! on 2002-08-30 07:04 [#00372243]
Points: 5213 Status: Addict
|
|
Asche-Sure thing :.)
LeCoeur-We DON'T want to know. It would raise too many question, dear.
;.P
|
|
pachi
from yo momma (United States) on 2002-08-30 07:05 [#00372248]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker
|
|
i just indicate them by trac number =p
|
|
Phatbert 000
from Augsburg (Germany) on 2002-08-31 16:44 [#00373747]
Points: 1618 Status: Lurker
|
|
I just bought Excursions in Ambience The Third Dimension and it has a track called "#19" by Aphex Twin on it. In the booklet it says "Taken from Selected Ambient Works Vol 2 (UK vinyl version). The track definitely isn't on the CD version. It's veeeery minimal (same thing looped for 10 mins) and I can imagine it fitting well on SAW II.
Anyway, let us know. Cheers.
|
|
Ubik
from United States on 2002-08-31 16:52 [#00373748]
Points: 662 Status: Lurker
|
|
#19 is from SAW II VINYL ONLY (the 19th song)... its only on CD on that Comp. ... i like it alot
|
|
Ubik
from United States on 2002-08-31 16:55 [#00373750]
Points: 662 Status: Lurker
|
|
the numbers of tracks are different.. 25 tracks for vinyl, 24 tracks for CD Warp UK, 23 tracks for the Sire USA version
|
|
zaphod
from the metaverse on 2002-08-31 16:59 [#00373751]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict | Followup to Phatbert 000: #00373747
|
|
thats Stone in Focus. They are many topics here on it. One of my favorite Aphex Twin songs.
|
|
jand
from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-08-31 17:03 [#00373752]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
#19 (stone in focus) is on the UK CD not on the US...
The names were first used on the IDM & aphextwin mailing lists and were just chosen cause they look close to the pics...I believe it was Alan Perry who decided on the names; he was a very active AFX fan on the IDM list (also responsible for a lot of the AFX FAQ)...
Now they are on cddb, they become more or less official....
check here for some more info re: diff US & UK.. http://www.aphextwin.nu/learn/98129720038060.shtml...
|
|
E-man
from Rixensart (Belgium) on 2002-08-31 17:48 [#00373778]
Points: 3000 Status: Regular | Followup to Phatbert 000: #00373747
|
|
it's not looping in fact...
|
|
weatheredstoner
from same shit babes. (United States) on 2002-08-31 17:59 [#00373790]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker
|
|
what do you mean its not looping?
|
|
jand
from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-08-31 18:07 [#00373799]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Followup to weatheredstoner: #00373790 | Show recordbag
|
|
read phatberts post....
|
|
Phatbert 000
from Augsburg (Germany) on 2002-08-31 18:36 [#00373830]
Points: 1618 Status: Lurker
|
|
well I've got a 24-track copy of SAW II and #19 is DEFINITELY not on it.
|
|
xceque
on 2002-08-31 18:46 [#00373837]
Points: 5888 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
phatbert is defintely right, 'stone in focus' (I actually really hate these so-called titles) is not on either the UK CD or the US one. the one (laughingly) called 'hankie' is on the UK version, but not the US. The only place where 'stone in focus' can be found on CD is that Ambiences In the 3rd Dimension compilation. It *is* on the UK vinyl version however. crackle crackle (and, if it's the brown vinyl version, CRACKLE!!!)
|
|
Phatbert 000
from Augsburg (Germany) on 2002-08-31 18:52 [#00373844]
Points: 1618 Status: Lurker
|
|
the brown vinyl is currently at EUR 25 on ebay. If I wasn't going to England in 2 days I'd be bidding for that. DANG!
|
|
uzim
on 2002-08-31 20:59 [#00373966]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker
|
|
the great mystery is:
WHY IS [Z TWIG] CALLED [Z TWIG]? WHY Z?? WHY WHY WHYYYY ZZZZZZ???
|
|
diablo
on 2002-08-31 23:13 [#00374038]
Points: 3242 Status: Lurker
|
|
Brown vinyl. Damn. It's not just brown, it's SHIT colour. My flatmate of the time got it when it came out, I remember waiting for the landlady to go to bed so we could get the bong going, we listened to it all, (lots of flipping) it was amazing. We listened and checked out all the pics, graphs and shit, IT WOZ NICE.
|
|
DaWeeze
from WANTED IN 16 STATES! on 2002-08-31 23:38 [#00374068]
Points: 5213 Status: Addict
|
|
Because it's twig shaped like a Z...;.)
Uzim...what the hell is that in your avatar...you're not trapping souls again are you...;.)
|
|
jand
from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-09-01 07:17 [#00374255]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Followup to xceque: #00373837 | Show recordbag
|
|
cheers...I always make that mistake...
I picked up a copy of that comp with '#19' on it on ebay a while back & I remember thinking 'well, I'm sure I've heard that before' the first time I had a listen....wonder why they left it off the SAWII CDs, it fits in so well....
|
|
afxNUMB
from So.Flo on 2002-09-01 07:24 [#00374264]
Points: 7099 Status: Regular
|
|
things that make you go hmmm
|
|
Phatbert 000
from Augsburg (Germany) on 2002-09-01 09:44 [#00374346]
Points: 1618 Status: Lurker
|
|
because there's no space left on those CDs jand.
The first one's 79 and the second 77 minutes. Try and get a 10 min track on there!
|
|
Duble0Syx
from Columbus, OH (United States) on 2002-09-01 09:50 [#00374347]
Points: 3436 Status: Lurker
|
|
I know it's on the vinyl. It may be possible to fit it on a cd if you do an overburn...
|
|
Phatbert 000
from Augsburg (Germany) on 2002-09-01 11:15 [#00374359]
Points: 1618 Status: Lurker
|
|
what the fuck's an overburn? You can't get more than 80 mins on a CD, and if you can, I've never seen it anywhere before.
|
|
jand
from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-09-01 11:26 [#00374363]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
it does exist, 99min CDRs are pretty common now...but yeah, I don't expect the tech was there to do this then....
|
|
uzim
on 2002-09-01 18:03 [#00374636]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker
|
|
DaWeeze > on my avatar? it's a picture of lain! i'm not trapping souls... (like the knights ;))
shaped like a z? hmm... already thought of it, but i don't see it looking like a z (it is such a blurry close-up!)... bah, that's not really important anyway.
|
|
DaWeeze
from WANTED IN 16 STATES! on 2002-09-01 21:12 [#00374731]
Points: 5213 Status: Addict
|
|
Yeah. The point is...it's a nice, short tune.
;.)
|
|
titsworth
from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-09-02 20:45 [#00376033]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker
|
|
99min cd-r's? cool, i'll burn 'the wall'. i hate burning cd's (i've done it for about 6 or 7 albums ever) but fucking pink floyd charge too much for this album.
if you didn't know, 'the wall' is set to have a "minimum price." i forget what it is but i've never seen it under $24, which is expensive for a 2CD set (which is in fact only 81 minutes). also, the beatles cd's are a minimum $14.99. never less. really obnoxious, but they know they can get away with it.
|
|
Messageboard index
|