54 CYMRU BEATS!!!! | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 80 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613408
Today 0
Topics 127499
  
 
Messageboard index
54 CYMRU BEATS!!!!
 

AFX Tea-wing on 2001-08-15 22:59 [#00022245]



I just think......but
This track goes beyond thinking.
So everyone that doesn't understand or acknowledges it, has
to think harder. Not about this track, but about what music
is or what the word music means to say.


 

Phobiazero from Sweden on 2001-08-15 23:03 [#00022246]



Also playable from this location.

Joyrex: No worry, since the mp3 is converted from the actual
rm-file. Same quality - doesn't matter whether it's mp3 or
real media.


 

AFX Tea-wing on 2001-08-15 23:05 [#00022247]



The quality of an aphex-track doesn't matter, only the real
listener listents to any track as if it was bare.


 

Joyrex from joyrex.com of course! on 2001-08-15 23:10 [#00022248]



NO, it does matter - having it as RM controls the
distribution of the track, and it was a SureStream, so
someone with a high-bandwidth connection could get a decent
sounding MP3 from it. I did, and WARP did a RealAudio file
for that very reason - they would have done an MP3 if they
didn't mind it being distributed all over the net.


 

CM on 2001-08-16 01:19 [#00022278]



Alrighty, well, i'm not at home at the moment, but when i do
i'll send the mp3 to those who want it...like Phobia said,
it is the same quality as the *.rm file, BUT...what Joyrex
is saying about the restrictions sounds correct as well, so
i'll wait till we have official confirmation as to whether
its ok to post to this site or not, k? Just to be safe :)

btw, i can spice the mp3 up to sound very nice if everything
has the go ahead


 

plaidzebra from midwest you ess on 2001-08-16 02:26 [#00022286]



this new track is much ado about nothing, an endless
(nearly, it feels) series of elaborations with little
genuine content. i think....


 

echase from sf on 2001-08-16 08:21 [#00022324]



What bugs me about these new songs (the "Two Remixes" and
Cymru) is how they lack the *personality* that RDJ's tracks
always have. No matter what their "style," no matter how
simple or complex, Aphex songs always sound like real,
living, breathing, one-of-a-kind things... like great
"songs" do, in any genre. These new ones, while real clever,
just sound like "tracks." They don't seem to have that extra
Aphex "essence," whatever it is. And they do sound a little
self-cannibalizing, like he's retreading old ground...

Nuts, the last thing I want is for RDJ to be "losing his
touch," or whatever... but it happens to the best of them,
and he's sure the best. As much as I'm looking forward to
the album, I'm apprehensive; and these tidbits have only
made me more so.


 

killer bob from FIN on 2001-08-16 10:54 [#00022340]



very nice song, great melodies (as usual
), noises and that weird humming/mumble or what ever it
is...I like it !!!!


 

Dirty Priest from Denmark on 2001-08-17 16:00 [#00022711]



I fucking love iT!!!


 

PostModernVancouver from Vancouver,Canada on 2001-08-17 18:23 [#00022742]



Echase SF, I think you might be eating your words come album
time.
Sorry, but I'm personally not a big fan of AB 3 and I think
they lack 'personality' compared to a lot of other Aphex
stuff ( with about 3 exceptions), same with AB 4 nothing
special , im sorry.
As a matter of fact even though 54 CB might be one of the
lesser so-called tunes off DRUQKS I think it still has more
'personality' then all of AB 4 and abput 70% off Ab 3 ( I
really dont see why AB 3 is regarded so highly, I think AB 5
kicks AB 3's ass alone).
Dont judge too quick, theres 29(!) other tunes still waiting
for you, and ofcourse theyre not gonna come out swinging
with the best of tunes as a sample, theyre gonna save the
best for last.
Always better in any facet of life, in this case its the
album.


 

Earface on 2001-08-17 18:39 [#00022748]



Yeah, this track is fucking hardcore. I've been waiting for
some stuff that sounds more like his live gigs.
BOOMBOOMBOOMBBBBBBBB


 

Garry Shandling from Sherman Oaks on 2001-08-17 22:49 [#00022841]



Yes, it's ok.


 

m....M..Mw )wW(m M m)Ww( wM..M....m on 2001-08-18 00:05 [#00022865]



It's fairly weak. Definately not as good as windowlicker or
come to daddy. This sounds like he used shareware. (For
example there were a lot of sounds that were repeated
exactly the same again and again, like the same wav file was
played each time- previously he tediously hacked up stuff to
make every strike of sound different.) This IS only 1 of a
whole bunch of tracks though. Squarepusher, autechre and
aphex all peaked out then fell down (well obviously I'm
predicting the aphex part anyway). Luckily I'm not worried
at all because I've been refreshed from great equally great
artists that are great like the great proem, crunch and
while. Check them all out on forcedexposure.com. They are
great. Start with Crunch's "1". Just buy that one album, I'm
telling you. You have to take a chance though because I
don't think you can hear it before you buy it. I doubt the
new aphex will be better than that, at least from what I
heard. It also beats autechre's latest release in my book so
far.


 

f.l.e.a from NZ on 2001-08-18 05:03 [#00022925]



I just heard it...and quite enjoyed it..he is reusing a lot
of signature samples gives it a nice continuum with the rest
of his work...and it does get better with every listen...but
is it me or is it really becoming a real struggle telling
aphex and squarepusher tunes apart...if it wasn't for those
signature samples i mentioned... I don't know could have
been a squarepusher song


 

Xanatos from NYC on 2001-08-18 07:16 [#00022939]



I just heard it for the first time and it's not that great,
I mean, cool off beat but I never really get into it, I
agree with echase, it lacks the unique aphex sound.
Honestly if I downloaded it on Napster I probably would have
thought it was a fake.
There is one point where I fucking love it, and that's
between:
-1:20 and 1:40 in the song-
and I'm like wow this is gonna be great, and then it dies
down again. I would have loved the whole track to have more
of that kind of stuff in it.

I'm not totally dissapointed, in fact, I'm only more excited
to get the album. I have a feeling that me and Rich would
not agree on what his best/our favorite tracks are. And it
also wouldn't surprise me that even if he thought a track
was his best, it wouldn't be the one he releases.
Anyhow...I'm quite hyped.
Viva el Druqks!


 


Messageboard index