 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 Now online (1)Monoid ...and 312 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2613477 Today 3 Topics 127503 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Russia & Iraq To Sign Huge Trade Deal 19/08/2002 03:05 PM Reuters MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia says it is set to sign a US$40 billion economic and trade cooperation agreement with Iraq in a move that could complicate Washington's plans to topple Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. A top Russian official confirmed the deal was being prepared despite concerns expressed by the administration of US President George W Bush, who has made ousting Saddam a top priority and is seeking to build international support for a possible attack on Iraq. "This document is being prepared," Oleg Buklemeshev, an adviser to Prime Minister Mikhail Kasyanov, told Reuters, confirming a Washington Post report on the deal. "We do not know when it will be signed. When it is ready, it will be signed." Buklemeshev said the five-year deal to cooperate in areas ranging from oil to electric energy and railroads would not violate UN sanctions imposed on Iraq after its 1990 invasion of Kuwait. "It is in line with current international agreements," he said. Buklemeshev added the deal was "an umbrella document setting a framework for the development of economic ties between companies from the two countries". But analysts in Moscow said the deal between the Soviet-era allies would have political, rather than financial consequences. Russia has close economic ties with Iraq, which owes Moscow Soviet-era debt believed to be worth several billion dollars, and hopes to proceed with lucrative oil deals once sanctions against Baghdad are lifted. But under UN resolutions, Iraq can currently sell only limited amounts of oil, using the cash to buy food and medicine. While Russian firms are among the top buyers of Iraqi crude, buying annually oil worth $5 billion, most of their most promising deals remain frozen by UN sanctions. Russia's top oil firm LUKOIL signed a $4 billion deal in 1997, but has so far been unable to start work. "Given that none of the major agreements signed in the past have been fully implemente |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
"Given that none of the major agreements signed in the past have been fully implemented, I would say this agreement will remain on paper," Vladislav Metnyov, an analyst with Renaissance Capital said. "The difficult political situation will also stop the deal being seriously implemented in the near future." "AXIS OF EVIL" After the Washington Post published news of the planned Russia-Iraq deal on Saturday, US officials, keen to sidestep a public clash with Moscow, said Russia should bear in mind its obligations under UN Security Council resolutions. "We're confident Russia understands its obligations under UN Security Council resolutions and will abide by them," White House spokeswoman Claire Buchan said. An agreement with Iraq, part of Bush's "axis of evil" of states accused of seeking weapons of mass destruction, could add to disagreements which have marred Moscow and Washington's friendship over the past months. The two sides, which saw their relations blossom after the September 11 attacks, have already publicly disagreed over Moscow's plans to boost nuclear cooperation with Iran, also part of the "axis". Washington says Iraq has been a threat since it invaded Kuwait, triggering the 1991 Gulf War. Bush's plans to oust Saddam have sparked dissent even within his own political ranks, casting doubt on his capacity to muster enough domestic support to take action. A deal between Moscow and Baghdad, heavy in political significance, could make it even harder for Washington to gather national and international sceptics behind an attack. Moscow has said it will oppose any military action against Iraq, calling instead for new diplomatic efforts to eliminate fears over weapons of mass destruction. Iraq has said it is "firmly resolved" to continue talks with the United Nations on letting UN weapons inspectors return to the country after being locked out for four years. Their return is a key precondition to the suspending of sanctions, but Baghdad has yet to a |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
agree to on ground rules for fresh inspections |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
OK, another political thread, eh? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Anyone? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
politics and geography baffle my brain, of course that's because my brain is makiz of cheez wiz, as you can see it's understateable. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I thought what Russia was doing was so postivie and open minded and objective and then the UN/US starts sticking it's oars in. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Cold War 2. Mark my words... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Hmm, I dunno, I am not the one to support sanctions against Iraq (being at the receiving end of eceonomical sanctions for the best part of the last 10 years, I know they are screwed up and not even very efficient). On the other hand, Russia does this because Iraq owes them big bucks. It's business as usual, I guess. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
+It's business as usual, I guess. + just as it should be:) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Argh, and I hate any kind of business, you know that... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
