Buying a synth, any suggestions? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 300 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613474
Today 0
Topics 127502
  
 
Messageboard index
Buying a synth, any suggestions?
 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2002-07-29 21:39 [#00329644]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



I've been searching around the net for a keyboard/synth
that will meet my needs, that being merely price range.

I've been thinking the Yamaha CS2X or the Yamaha SY22,
anyone have experience with either of these or suggestions
on other makes/models?

Im going to buy from ebay, so my highest price would
probably be around 300, so that would be list price of
around 700-800. thx :)


 

offline WeaklingChild from Glasgow (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-29 21:40 [#00329649]
Points: 3354 Status: Lurker



CS2X!!!!!
The CS1X rules so the upgraded one must rule.
IT HAS TO!!!!!!!!


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2002-07-29 21:59 [#00329693]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



yeah thats what I thought, I've heard such great things
about both the CS2x and the CS1X...

The CS2X is definately what I would want the most, dont know
if I'll be able to get it tho, but yeah.


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2002-07-29 22:15 [#00329715]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



cmon u bums, i know theres a lot more electronic musicians
out there than just weakling child! I need feedback! :)


 

offline manicminer from Paris (France) on 2002-07-29 23:05 [#00329761]
Points: 1423 Status: Lurker



Why don't you forget a modern digital synth like that and
get something truly tweakable, like a Roland Juno 106. You
can pick one up second-hand for around £400, probably even
£300 if you shop around.

The 106 has MIDI capabilities, so you can use it as a
controller keyboard, sequence it, etc. But it's a true
analogue beast, and (in my opinion) a MUCH better synth than
the CS2X.

My mate had a CS1X - it's quite a nice synth, but it's all
just PCM waveform stuff and it doesn't sound all that
amazing. Any sound you can produce on a CS1/2X you can
definitely reproduce on a computer. That's the thing about
modern digital synths - you can do it all on a computer.
And they're usually really hard to program.

The Juno on the other hand is extremely versatile, VERY easy
to program, and sounds brilliant. I used to have a Juno 60
and I wish I still had it.

If monophonic sound doesn't bother you, I'd also consider a
Korg MS20.

For further information on synths and stuff, go to
www.vintagesynth.com


 

offline Murray from Southend, Essex (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-29 23:08 [#00329764]
Points: 4891 Status: Lurker



Good site that, really factual and good opinions

It really depends what kind of music you want to do, CSX
Range is like for Dance (sometimes commercial stuff) but for
example i recently got a Roland XP-30 (which i LOVE) and
that was £700 and it has 1500+ sounds on it that cater for
anyhting from hard drum and bass to sothing acoustic or
african tribal beats

but give Vintage Synth's 'Synth Finder' a whirl


 

offline manicminer from Paris (France) on 2002-07-29 23:09 [#00329766]
Points: 1423 Status: Lurker



Just checked on ebay.com for you - 106s seem to be going for
$300 - $500

I would seriously reconsider on the CS1/2X thing though.
For the same money you could definitely get a much more
interesting synthesiser.


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-07-29 23:24 [#00329790]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker



If you want to sound like a piano or other real instruments
the CS2x might be a good choice, it can also do electronic
sounds but not as good as a VA synth or a real analogue. If
you want good electronic sounds you could try the An1x.



 

offline manicminer from Paris (France) on 2002-07-29 23:31 [#00329800]
Points: 1423 Status: Lurker



Laserbreak's right - if you want piano's, etc, then the CS
might be a good bet (but there are plenty of Softsynths that
can do that).

The AN1X might be a good choice, although some say that it
is a bitch to programme (never used one myself).


 

offline jimisteel from SLC (United States) on 2002-07-29 23:46 [#00329813]
Points: 363 Status: Regular



The roland JV1010 sound module with controller keyboard. It
has alot of instruments plus snyth sounds. It even has its
own internal effects. You can use the module with a
computer to adjust more details. You can also buy more
sounds you just insert a card into the top of the sound
module and you have a whole new bank of sounds. Its $399
plus a controller keyboard.


 

offline USACID from Death Valley (Zambia) on 2002-07-29 23:52 [#00329818]
Points: 788 Status: Lurker



Waldorf Q


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-30 00:40 [#00329838]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker



I wouldn't bother iwth a cs1x or 2x, i've got a 1x and it's
pretty shit, I only ever use it as a controller keyboard. If
you really want a hardware synth then get a proper one, not
a Rompler, everyone i've known whose got one has always been
trying to sell theirs. The CsXX's are far too dance
orientated

FM synths are very versatile and cheap. Also, I wouldn't
bother with ebay because the prices often get hiked FAR
higher than the stuff is worth. The Juno 106 is cool but
these things break now and it's hard and expensive to get
parts/them fixed.

many FM synths are built like brick shithouses and I
seriously think you'd get the most out of one of these if
you are prepared to programme your own sounds.


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2002-07-30 01:36 [#00329882]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Thanks everyone for the input..

B3n - what FM synths would you recommend?


 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2002-07-30 01:41 [#00329888]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular



Ensonique EPS is the only keyboard that ever did anything
for me..I know it's not a synth..but it's one heck of a
sampler sequencer..CZ1000 was my old old plaything..


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-30 01:54 [#00329905]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #00329882



yamaha DX100
yamaha tx81z (module, you'd need a midi controller
keyboard)
yamaha tx7-dx7 in a box

oh and the cs1x's midi is laughable, you can only basically
get 1 decent sound playing at a time (monotimbral)


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2002-07-30 01:57 [#00329908]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to B3n: #00329905 | Show recordbag



yeah, i was actually considering getting a tx81z since they
are so cheap and then finding a midi keyboard...

is the DX100 a synth/keyboard in one?


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-30 02:04 [#00329916]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #00329908



yes, small, or try a dx 11 or 21 (bigger)


 

offline USACID from Death Valley (Zambia) on 2002-07-30 02:04 [#00329917]
Points: 788 Status: Lurker



Waldorf Q
Waldorf Q
Waldorf Q

did i mention Waldorf Q?


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-30 02:05 [#00329919]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to USACID: #00329917



££££££££££££££££££££££3333


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2002-07-30 14:08 [#00330557]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to B3n: #00329916 | Show recordbag



how about a dx27, know anything about that 'un?


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-30 14:15 [#00330563]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #00330557



dunno about that


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-07-30 14:17 [#00330564]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



You'll probably all laugh, but have you considered a
midi-controller/pc/midi keyboard combo? With all the
softsynths around it really is a very versatile setup...


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2002-07-30 14:21 [#00330567]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to B3n: #00330563 | Show recordbag



well according to vintage synth, the dx27 is like a full
size dx100, but they seem to think its pretty shitty. :)


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-30 14:33 [#00330572]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #00330567



DX11's are good

but yeah, i'd get a midi controller and either a module or
softsynth


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2002-07-30 15:01 [#00330584]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to B3n: #00330572 | Show recordbag



ok, ill check out the dx11...

btw, what does mono/multitimbral mean?


 

offline Wizard MaC from Amersfoort (Netherlands, The) on 2002-07-30 16:26 [#00330687]
Points: 307 Status: Regular



CS2x is a good choice...but
I don't think of it as a REAL synth

I own a AN1x and this thing is.....
FUCKING AWESOME and AFFORDABLE!

-8 assignable control knobs
-ribbon controller (assignable)
-FM synthesis
-Virtual Analog synthesis
-good keyboard
-UNISON mode PPPHHHAAATTTT sounds
-LOTS of editing possiblities
-very suitable for industrial sounds
-also really good in spaced out strings and pads

and more more more



 

offline manicminer from Paris (France) on 2002-07-30 16:32 [#00330697]
Points: 1423 Status: Lurker



Another pair of new digital (analogue-emulating, like the
AN1X) synths you might want to consider are the Korg MS2000
and the Novation KStation.



 

offline Wizard MaC from Amersfoort (Netherlands, The) on 2002-07-30 16:37 [#00330701]
Points: 307 Status: Regular



Korg MS2000: in future music, they said it has a good
characteristic sound, more like the MS20 than like the
Moogs

Kstation: they say it's suitable for most things, but not
for REALLy complex
sounds. Still a good choice I think



 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-30 17:01 [#00330725]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker



you guys, both those synths may sound good, but their midi
specs suck,

the ms2k is only 6 note polyphonic and the k-station is
either monophonic or monotimbral (can't remember which,
either way, sucks)

to answer the earlier question, monotimbral means you can
only have one patch playing at a time, whereas multitimbral
can have lots of patches. an analogy would be a violin vs an
orchestra. polyphony is how many notes can be played at same
time, ie ms2k can only play 6, which is shitty

these things make cool sounds but as a first synth they
aren't worth the money...you want something you can make
almost a full track with and is good for a wide range of
sounds. FM is ideal as long as you want electronic sounds
because it can span subsonic basslines to leads


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2002-07-30 17:30 [#00330746]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to B3n: #00330725 | Show recordbag



yeah ok, thats what I figured, thanks for all the info
b3n..

I've been thinkin about the An1x, that one seems like it
would suit my needs pretty well.. :)


 

offline jimisteel from SLC (United States) on 2002-07-30 17:51 [#00330776]
Points: 363 Status: Regular



Any company that makes dirt bike and Four wheelers and
keyboards is a joke to me, yamaha you've got to be kiding
me, just my opinion but i would never buy anything yamaha.


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2002-07-30 18:24 [#00330813]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to jimisteel: #00330776 | Show recordbag



why? because they make more than 1 type of product?

so if warp signed a pop artist, would you stop listening to
that lable entirely?

honestly, the fact that they make more than 1 type of
product doesnt mean that the quality is any less, no offense
but thats just fucking retarded.


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-30 18:59 [#00330856]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to jimisteel: #00330776



haha, that is quite frankly one of the stupidest things I
have ever read on this board (and i've read a lot of stupid
things on this board)

So FM Synthesis wasn't good or important because it was
developed and marketed by a company that makes other
products?

Half the music mentioned on this board has derived from FM
(mu-ziq, squarepusher, snares, devine to name some users)
and it has had a massive impact on the music scene since it
was first launched back in early 80's

you should be giving a shit about the quality of the product
and not who its made by...granted yamaha have made some shit
but so have korg and roland (the mc303, what the fuck was
that?!!)


 

offline Mickey Mouse from The Moon on 2002-07-30 19:10 [#00330867]
Points: 4130 Status: Addict



"btw, what does mono/multitimbral mean?"

mono means only one note can sound at a time

multitimbral means more then one note can sound at a time,
some synths can play up to 128 notes at the same time

check out this site, it will really help if your looking for
some info on a synth

vintagesynth.com

or ask the people at this site in the forum section

futureproducers.com


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2002-07-30 19:37 [#00330905]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



"mono means only one note can sound at a time"

but what does that mean? i can only press one key at a time,
and any more wont sound? i must be thinking of a different
definition for note.



 

offline hannibal from United Kingdom on 2002-07-30 20:27 [#00330984]
Points: 518 Status: Lurker



i have the rack/desktop version of the sy22, the tg33 (which
is better for reasons i can't remember). it's not
particularly programmable though. there seem to be four
oscillators (2 fm and 2 of yamahas type of synthesis -
theres a list of waveforms for each) and you can mix between
sounds with a joystick. thats a pretty cool feature. you can
use it for detune on the overall patch which sounds cool as
well.

the tg33 has no filter though, which pisses me off, but has
a few fx.

i haven't looked into the dx11, but mike paradinas uses one
(bassline for dirtwah to name an example).

i also have an ensoniq ESQ-1, which is v. cool and a lot
more versatile that the tg33. its still digital though, but
the filters sound pretty analogue. no effects though, so i
have to put it through my bass multi fx.



 

offline hannibal from United Kingdom on 2002-07-30 20:30 [#00330989]
Points: 518 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #00330905



zeph: with a monophonic synth, only one note will sound at
one, so you cant play chords. if you hold one note, and
press another, the synth will slide up or down to the second
note (i think)


 

offline hepburnenthorpe from sydney (Australia) on 2002-07-30 20:32 [#00330992]
Points: 1365 Status: Lurker | Followup to B3n: #00330725



the k station is 16 vioce polyphonic. sounds fucking awesome
too i might add.

i have an a station which is bassically a rack mntd k
station but only 8 vioce poly.


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2002-07-30 20:37 [#00331002]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to hannibal: #00330989 | Show recordbag



ok yeah cuz that would suck, i mean I would want to play
some chords on the damn thing too, so what polyphonic would
you guys recommend? 8? 10?


 

offline hannibal from United Kingdom on 2002-07-30 20:43 [#00331010]
Points: 518 Status: Lurker



yeah theyre only good for basslines and lead lines as an
extra for a setup. i don't really take notice of the
polyphony, but i think todays synths have pretty big
numbers. like 64 voice or something. someone else will
confirm this, or proclaim my rantings as "just bollocks".


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2002-07-30 20:50 [#00331021]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



well I was thinking of getting an an1x by yamaha, but now
that its only got 10 voice polyphony im not sure if it would
be worth it.

i just want something that I can play like a piano but with
crazy effects and drum beats and shit.


 

offline hannibal from United Kingdom on 2002-07-30 20:57 [#00331035]
Points: 518 Status: Lurker



looking at a list of synths, polyphony varies a lot.
something like the roland jp 8080 (virtual analogue like the
an1x) is 10 voice polyphonic as well. something pattern
based like the mc 505 has 64.


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2002-07-30 21:06 [#00331047]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



well, what would you guys recommend that has a good mix of
1) good sound, 2) memory, 3) acceptable
polyphony/multitimbrality (not even sure if thats a word),
4) good effects/drum beats (and hopefully as many of them as
possible).


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-30 23:25 [#00331281]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to hepburnenthorpe: #00330992



is it multitimbral though?

i've got a bassStation and its a monosynth....but since its
for basslines I don't mind


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2009-11-16 19:14 [#02344813]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker



lol

Ensoniq esq-1 all the way.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2009-11-16 20:24 [#02344830]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



What are you looking for exactly? I mean, for $300 you have
a lot of options available to you. However, most of the
'amazing' synthesizers retain their value for a reason, and
you will have to make some compromises.

1)Good sound; what kind of sound are you looking for? Their
are a lot of different goods out there, and each
manufacturer seems to offer something different.

2)Memory; I take it this is patch memory you are talking
about?

3)Acceptible polyphony; How much do you need? How much are
you willing to sacrifice?

4a)Good effects; A lot of hardware boxes with either offer
servicable effects, or no effects. I wouldn't look for good
effects in your synthesizer unless you are planning on
gigging with it, and even then it usually requires
unfortunate menu diving to access parameters.

4b)Drum beats; that seems to be the field of consumer model
casio and yamaha keyboards. If you buy something because of
the drumbeats it offers, I see a lot of dissapointment in
your future.

---to be continued---


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2009-11-16 20:38 [#02344832]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



Some suggestions;

Roland sh32; I forget the specs on polyphony, but I can tell
you this synthesizer was a lot of fun to use. It had decent
sound, but the filter stepped like crazy, so you can't
expect smooth filter sweeps or anything like that.

Yamaha SY22; I loved this keyboard. The keys felt great, it
sounded good, and was a lot of fun to play. Programming was
arduous at best.

Oberheim Matrix 6; great sounding synthesizer. Only 6
voices, and programming was a nightmare. The rack version
was easy to get ahold of.

Alesis Micron/Ion; Good sound, but not amazing. Lots of
features, including a step sequencer. Doesn't play well with
midi (well, it plays well, but trying to edit parameter
sweeps in your DAW is an exercise in masochism).

Roland Alpha Juno; Someone else mentioned this here
recently. I hear lots of good things about these
synthesizers.

Access Virus; Altho these are a bit out of your price range,
if you can come across a cheaper old one that would meet all
your criteria fantastically

Thats what I would suggest on ebay in your price range. If I
think of anything else I will add them here later. Don't
fall for the microkorg trap.

Hannibal; the filters in an esq-1 sound analogue
because they are ;)


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2009-11-16 20:41 [#02344834]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker



microkorg sux dicks


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2009-11-16 20:46 [#02344836]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



I had forgotten about this thread but I appreciate the new
contributions to it. I'm not currently in the market for a
synth but I'd like to invest in something analogue in the
near future. Taxidermist, your post(s) is appreciated and
will undoubtedly be very helpful to anyone looking for a
good synth on a budget.


 


Messageboard index