Animal's Thoughts | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 153 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613408
Today 0
Topics 127499
  
 
Messageboard index
Animal's Thoughts
 

Wizards Teeth on 2001-08-04 10:35 [#00019655]



Does anyone know if animals think about things?

Do all humans think in thier spoken language, if so do dogs
think in barks ?


 

Loogie from UK on 2001-08-04 10:45 [#00019658]



That's deep.

My dog barks in his sleep
but come to think of it so does my girlfriend : )


 

=|R3FL3X|= from Edmonton, Alberta, Canada on 2001-08-04 10:53 [#00019661]



Well. I think that animals think along the same "IDEAS" as
we do. You know like. Im hungry, Ill go eat. Or Im thirsty
ill go have a drink. Its all UNIVERSAL to a certain point
right? Because our needs and wants are somewhat all there to
each animal. Its a hard one to try and explain. My dog,
sometimes I swear I can tell what he wants, or what he is
trying to say when he is barking. I think that the dogs know
that we don't get them, and they don't get us for the most
part. I mean, when the dog is at the door scratching - he
wants out. Or if he is at his food bowl and is staring at it
empy he wants food. Just like when we tell them to SIT or
STAY or something they get it, because of your actions and
works and tone in the past. They understand, in their mind,
what we in OUR mind what them to do, or how to behave. Its
odd.


 

Wizards Teeth on 2001-08-04 11:02 [#00019665]



So, do animals have the power to think of new ideas.

As an example could a horse think invent communism or could
a duck think of a new recipie for a cake ?


 

=|R3FL3X|= from Edmonton, Alberta, Canada on 2001-08-04 11:12 [#00019669]



No. Because as we do it, {think of something, that we know
of, based on knowledge, or experiance, first or second hand}
think about certain things like Communism or A Cake Recipe,
we are doing it because these things are a part of our
reality. Our brain capacity has brought us this far in our
world as a society. And we only use about 6% or something
like that. Imagine is we used even 20% of our brain, let
alone 90% or something.

So you see, ducks would think about getting food, shelter,
and other normal animalistic things such as those. And
Horses have not evolved enough, you know what I mean. Its a
hard topic.

THINK ABOUT THIS IDEA - What if instead of monkeys or apes
evolving, and eventually turning into humans and so on. What
if it was chickens or turtles or something??? Then all OUR
history would be gone obviously, everything in the world
would be from a turtle or whatever animal, and history would
be 100% changed or different. Like holywood?? It could be
something like it, or Turtlewood?? Or nothing at all like
it. you see there are many odd questions.


 

boxrocket on 2001-08-04 11:22 [#00019672]



i think certain animals that are smarter than others (dogs,
cats, pigs, horses) have the ability to think up ideas,
yeah. i think they can plan on doing certain things ahead of
time, like playing jokes on you. my uncle's dog is a very
smart dog, and he doesn't like me much. he knows he's not
allowed to leave the backyard, but everytime you open the
gate he tries to squeeze his way through. i discovered that
while he runs away from you as fast as he can if you try to
catch him, he'll come straight up to the door and scratch on
it if you just ignore him and go inside once he escapes the
back yard. he knows that it makes me angry when he escapes
through the gate and runs off, but if i pretend like i don't
care about it, and i just go back inside, it's no fun for
him anymore because he thinks he hasn't succeeded in pissing
me off. so he comes right back to the house. i think the
only reason he leaves the back yard to start with is not
because he wants out, but rather because he wants to make me
angry. he likes playing this game to piss me off. if he's
capable of doing this, i think he is just as capable of
thinking up other ideas that he never fully executes.


 

Wizards Teeth on 2001-08-04 11:34 [#00019674]



I understand, are you trying to say that all ideas are based
on ideas that have already happened.

I suppose ideas and concepts have evolved with humans.

Why for example did humand 2000 years ago not design a
spaceship instead of bread (i do not know the exact
invention date of bread). I know bread is a less complex
invention but bread would have been just as revolutionary.

I also like to contemplate why things are invented at the
times they are invented. Why have we not yet invented a
method of boiling water to make tea in one second instead of
four minutes. Imagine a machine that allows water to be
added and after switching one switch to intsantly transform
the water into boiling water. Or why have we not invented a
machine that makes a seed grow into a flower in on minute
instead of three months. Could it not be possible to speed
up biological processes to all the gestation period of a
growing human to be halved. In essence doubling the "speed"
of time.

Does time have a "speed". I read about atomic clock
experiments, apparantly time slows down as the speed of an
object increases, if the speed of light is reached does time
stop or does it reverse? Therefore light will constantly
exist, therefore the universe will never end.

I don't know really, it would help if I actually was "Steven
Hawkins".

Also tonight I was going to go out, I am no longer going out
as I refuse to wear shoes to dance in. I class dancing as an
exercise, you do not see sprinters wearing stilleto heels on
the track do you.

*******CONCEPTS********

There may be a secret reason why ideas happen at certain
points. I suppose if monkeys had invented a spaceship
thousand of years ago, they would not have been able to fly
it as they would be unable to read the instructions or reach
the steering wheel.

I think the most important invention of all time is George
Michael's designer beard hair set-up.


 

Wizards Teeth on 2001-08-04 11:45 [#00019675]



Do animals have intelligence or do they execute thier
actions without thought.

I once seen a pigeon eat some sick. I told a tramp who I was
standing next to (I am not a tramp, I was just standing next
to him). He was upset.

I once also conversed with a tramp about a lovely russian
hat he once owned, I gave him a drink of my pop, His name
was Albert.

The tramp was called albert, the hat did not have a name.


 

Gl;itch from New Zealand on 2001-08-04 11:53 [#00019676]



define animal intelligence, I happen to think dogs as a
whole are stupid creatures.

some people think cats are stupid because they wont learn
tricks like dogs, I think its because they are smart enough
to not want to.

but its all subjective, I dont think humans are very
intelligent either, we still work on instinct more than we
care to acknowledge.


 

Wizards Teeth on 2001-08-04 12:40 [#00019677]



Animal Intelligence - Ask a horse to build a house and it
could not. As it is unable to pick up bricks

As a horse to supervise the building of a house. It could if
it went to university to study an architects degree,
delivered to the horse by one of those special people who
can talk to horses,

example - Robert Redford in the horse whisperer.

Then get Robert redford to teach some builders how to talk /
listen to a horse.

Hey Presto - You can now get a horse to supervise a building
site.


 

Plan 9 from Outer Space on 2001-08-04 14:47 [#00019688]



A horse with a university degree? You mean a zebra?


 

Peter File from the Paedoph Isles on 2001-08-04 14:54 [#00019689]



I like that episode of Blue Peter where the elephant done a
poo and the presenters fell over in the poo and they got poo
in their hair.


 

Earface from just off the on 2001-08-04 18:34 [#00019713]



Yeah, nice one Pete.

Um, I think intelligence in an animal is very limited. Like
children or the mentally ill (and in 'rational agents' too,
in our first acquisition of knowldge) they appear to be
constrained by their customary habitual experience of
everything. (This opinion is strongly influenced by [Humean]
Idealism - I don't pretend that it is all my own thought) In
away that any so-called 'idea' that they have is a pale
reflection of an initial impression (or experience) which
they would have received. You dog, for e.g., only eats it's
food because it has experience of it in the past, and having
initially investigated the impressions recieved by it's
senses it would consequently have a pale but corresponding
idea of it thereafter.
I think that humans differ because they are aware of
themselves. Acceptably, a dog or a horse my have some kind
of sense of 'self', but I don't believe that they have the
ability to think 'I have a sense of self', or 'I think', so
any personal identity within an animal is merely natural,
accidental, or innate.
Human's however have an awareness of the mere fact that they
think - of apperception - COGITO ERGO SUM - and can at least
become aware that the relationship between impressions (such
as the so-called effect of gravity on objects) is either
existent in 'nature' or created within the mind itself. This
goes as far as being aware that certain relationships are
necessary in our ordering of our impressions/experiences in
order to understand and describe what we 'know' - namely the
'a priori' synthetic judgement made possible by the
spatio-temporal framework or, in other words, space and time
(see Kant's Critique of Pure Reason - fucking excellent
stuff).

This view, however, can only be mere conjecture because I,
by my own argument, have no 'idea' of the mindset of an
animal because I could not possibly have had an impression
of it in which to deduce.


 

------ from ------ on 2001-08-04 18:54 [#00019714]



We are animals.

As we evolve, we find better ways to do things, and other
ways to communicate.
But human intelligence is unimportant for frogs. And the
frogs mind is unimportant for Us. We dont find interest in
helping the ants out in all kinds of situations 24-7.
I think that each species do what they find important, or
what they find interesting. Horses have no interest in
speaking the human language because they are not human
enough to see whats so important with it.


 

=|R3FL3X|= from Edmonton, Alberta, Canada on 2001-08-04 22:06 [#00019756]



Wizards Teeth: now you are getting into Quantum {spelling?}
Physics and stuff. Example of speed of light:

If I were to be spinning around you at the speed of light,
and you were just standing there you would age more than I
would. Theoreticly.

As well, a bit off topic but interesting the time theory.
Supposedly our time that we live in now is HERE, we all
share it and all know it. For instance, if I was to fly to
England right now and get there, your time would be relative
to my time here right? Right. Now, If I was in space, and I
was flying around, time is not relative there, only relative
to a pre-set structure of numbers.

Now... Supposedly our universe is but of one small layer to
a cosmic blanket of sorts, where like I said, we are but one
thin layer. Almost to the point of being 2d. Now, you may
think that since the universe is 3d up down, side to side,
and inbetween right? Well In space, where is that inbetween?
This ties in with the theory. since it is only a thin layer,
we can theoritcly BREAK through that layer somehow and enter
a parallel universe, where possibly Earth exists and humans
live there and so on. But their history and everything is
different. Or Earth doesn't exist at all. This is also the
theory of time travel.


 

m....M..Mw )wW(m M m)Ww( wM..M....m on 2001-08-04 22:25 [#00019767]



Hawking and newton argued that if a train moves on the
earth, you can be correct to say that the train is moving
east relative to the earth, or that the earth is moving west
relative to the train. So they stated that there is no
absolute space. My argument is that the very center of the
big bang can be used as the center of a huge 3 dimensional
x,y,z axis. The center of the big bang should be constant
because all matter moved outward from that central point. So
you could be more accurate in your knowledge of how the
train and earth are moving relative to the center of the big
bang instead. I could be wrong.

In one experiment, a rat navigated a maze on the first try,
making every wrong move possible. But gradually, after a few
trials, it knew exactly where to go. If a human were to do
this, they have the tool of speach at their disposal. They
can think in their head "left, left, right, left, around the
corner, left, left" Very specific instructions commited to
memory. Speach that is this useful and complicated is unique
among humans.

I will now squirt female mantis pheromone all over my face
and sit in the woods for awhile to see what happens. Not all
insects use chemical sexual attractants. Butterflies, for
example rely on visual attractants. Crickets use sound.


 

=|R3FL3X|= from Edmonton, Alberta, Canada on 2001-08-04 22:32 [#00019768]



Yes - Good to read that there are some knowledgable people
on this board. {I make spelling/grammatical errors a lot
though}. Anyway... have you read the experiments on the
BRAIN?

PLEASE READ AND TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK!!!

- Okay, ive seen these videos in some special classes I took
on the brain pathways, axons, relaystations and other
interesting things. Basicly they CUT the relay station in a
human brain {connects the two sides togher, right and left,
left controlling the right side of the body, and right
controlling the left side, among other things} and they gave
a block puzzle to this subject, at first he was only allowed
to use one hand to do it, his right hand {so his left brain
portion} and he could do it very well and fast {its a
childrens block puzzle}. Next they let him only use his left
hand {right brain} and he couldn't do it well, and
interestingly enough his right hand {that could do it
before} always tried to correct his left hands mistakes!!!!
This is quite interesting. Then whent hey let him do it with
both hands, one hand was doing it and the other was
constantly correcting mistakes and checking things over. You
see, his two brain portions were working as 1, but seperatly
due to the relay station not being there. HIS TWO BRAINS
COULDN'T TELL EACHOTHER WhAT THEY WERE DOING!


 

Lord Lufford of Morley on 2001-08-04 22:35 [#00019770]



Peter File, were you drunk when you wrote that message?


 

The Grey Gentleman from Eugene, Oregon on 2001-08-04 22:45 [#00019774]



Humans are animals. All animals shit, eat, drink, and plot.

My folks have a particularly evil little dog that is always
plotting, usually involving getting food somehow, without my
parents finding out. Their two dogs even frequently team up
and one will distract my mom while the other one goes for
the goods. The little bastards do this all the time. They're
quite intelligent. I doubted it at first, but they've done
it so many times, they're definitely trying to actually
deceive my parents. It's kind of remarkable to watch. They
pay no mind to me, I'm just "that new dumb slab of meat that
comes around to visit on occasion".

Us stupid, egotistical humans don't think that this is
possible, though, and I think animals like that. They can
get away with a lot more.


 

The Grey Gentleman from Eugene, Oregon on 2001-08-04 22:45 [#00019775]



Humans are animals. All animals shit, eat, drink, and plot.

My folks have a particularly evil little dog that is always
plotting, usually involving getting food somehow, without my
parents finding out. Their two dogs even frequently team up
and one will distract my mom while the other one goes for
the goods. The little bastards do this all the time. They're
quite intelligent. I doubted it at first, but they've done
it so many times, they're definitely trying to actually
deceive my parents. It's kind of remarkable to watch. They
pay no mind to me, I'm just "that new dumb slab of meat that
comes around to visit on occasion".

Us stupid, egotistical humans don't think that this is
possible, though, and I think animals like that. They can
get away with a lot more.


 

Earface on 2001-08-07 01:05 [#00020187]



Humans are not animals.

An animal is purely determined by the fact that they shit,
eat, piss (a poor argument anyway) in a way that is quite
disjointed from the behaviour of a human. Humans have the
ability to create and recreate the essential natures of
themselves in which they determine. Where a human would
still shit, eat, piss (Grey - this really is dire logic)
they have the CHOICE, the FREEDOM, to choose where, when,
and how to do it; with the added consideration of manners
and etiquette.

We also consider the LIVES of other humans, and animals to
that matter, in a
self-conscious, rational way.

It would be worth noting that such attitudes (that humans
are simply animals) led to the attrocities justified and
perpetrated by the Nazi's in the Second World War; and is an
attitude that should no longer lend itself to justification
- a lesson that should NEVER escape our understanding.


 

The Grey Gentleman from Eugene, Oregon on 2001-08-07 02:36 [#00020196]



SIEG HEIL, Cap'N bizkit!


 

Xanatos from NYC on 2001-08-07 03:08 [#00020198]



Earface: It would be hard for me to disagree with you more.

"An animal is pure determined by the fact that they shit,
eat, piss...with the aded consideration of manners and
etiquette"

Yes they do to it in a way that is "disjointed from humans"
but that does not seperate us. The human ability to
rationalize is solely based on our advanced and evolved
brain's which can determine the best methods for survival,
which is still, like an animal, or #1 goal. Any animal with
the brain capicity to realize that "Building a toilet and
shitting in it would keep filth and disease away from me,
hence helping me to survive and procreate" would. Any
animal with the intelligence to understand "If I build
weapons I will help defend myself better, or if I build a
farm I will help feed myself better, or if I keep myself
clean and wash with water instead of licking myself I will
be able to attract more females/males" would. It is all a
matter of survival of the individual and the species.
Animals are conscious of themselves and of their families,
who they take care of to survive. Just as we do.
Agreed: we vary immensely in intellectual capacity. But
does that REALLY seperate us?

WE STILL ACT ON INSTINCT AND SURVIVAL.

As for your thing about Nazi atrocities, that is TOTALLY
absurd. It is the feelings that animals are not real
conscious creatures, that cause us to torture them the way
we do everyday, as bad or worse as Jews in death camps. As
for the Holocaust, or slavery, or the White Man's Burder, it
was the feeling that the OPPOSING race, was not human, and
not worthy of life or to take care of itself. We must take
the attitude that ALL life is worthwhile, not that humans
are. Trust me, Hitler didn't think "Were animals and so are
they, let's burn them!" They (the nazis) thought: these
people (or animals) are obstacles, or impurities toward the
advancement of the Aryan race.

We must take the attitude that ALL life is worthwhile, not
that humans are. And this isn't just my vegan propoganda,
I'm not even a vegetarian (although I do support free range
food/laws), but animals are just like us, we've just
suprased them and forgotten it.


 

Gl;itch from New Zealand on 2001-08-07 09:29 [#00020235]



but Adolf Hitler was a Jew, so what does that say. It was
the Jewish religion and money greed that had the Germans go
against them.

Humans are animals, and no mater how far we think weve grown
from that we still act on basic impulses and instinct.


 

leftrightronic on 2001-08-07 10:32 [#00020245]



what the fuck do you think we are? animals.. extremely
evolved ones.


 

Gl;itch from New Zealand on 2001-08-07 10:44 [#00020247]



who was that rage directed at Leftrightronic ? and what did
you mean ?


 

wizards teeth on 2001-08-07 11:46 [#00020251]



Soemone mentioned that we use only 6% of our brain
capacity.

Can the other 94% be unlocked ?

Can drugs not deform certain areas of the brain and cause
the locked sections to become unlocked.

I read that mdma breaks down membrains in the brain thus
altering the structure of the brain, thus possibly releasing
"New Powers".

I wonder what would happen if we gave a horse some disco
biscuits ?

A party full of horses (one of my dreams)


 

Gl;itch from New Zealand on 2001-08-07 12:07 [#00020252]



i watched a program on mdma, some raver guy who had
parkinsons disease, or something similar, he had heaps of
trouble doing normal things, but if he took mdma he could
better control his movements and do things doctors couldnt
understand. its worth a thought anyway.


 

wizards teeth on 2001-08-07 13:04 [#00020258]



I seen that also, it was very interesting.

Is it possible to hypnotise people with music ?

If people can be hypnotised with voice, why not sound ?



 

Peter File from the Paedoph Isles on 2001-08-07 14:31 [#00020268]



E=MDMA


 

wizards teeth on 2001-08-07 14:48 [#00020269]



Peter File,

Correct


 

Peter File from the Paedoph Isles on 2001-08-07 15:04 [#00020270]



But seriously, folks, there's an interesting experiment
which involves feeding spiders drug-laced flies, and
observing how this affects the webs they make. The spider
on LSD actually made a web whose surface area, and hence
fly-catching potential, wasactually greater than normal.
Its shape was closer to the ideal symmetrical shape, and its
spirals were more consistently spaced.


 

Peter File from the Paedoph Isles on 2001-08-07 15:11 [#00020271]



Oh, and the web produced by the spider on caffeine was the
most fukd of the lot (the other drugs used were mescaline
and marijuana)


 

Gl;itch from New Zealand on 2001-08-07 16:59 [#00020289]



it fucked up the web on caffine or made a really good web ?
enigmatic mr File


 

Peter File from the Paedoph Isles on 2001-08-07 18:35 [#00020301]



It fucked it up bad, daddy!


 

Julian Casablancas on 2001-10-11 13:37 [#00040221]



This is why LSD is good.


 


Messageboard index