|
|
Toejam
from Perth (Australia) on 2002-07-22 04:13 [#00318997]
Points: 3077 Status: Regular
|
|
I'm not sure if SAW 85-92 exists on vinyl, and even if it did, it would be pretty expensive and hard to find. Still, imagine the warm sound and great bass it would have! There's something satisfying about putting on a vinyl, and I reckon SAW 85-92 would be great for it.
What's your opinion?
|
|
The_Funkmaster
from St. John's (Canada) on 2002-07-22 04:14 [#00318999]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker
|
|
vinyl sucks!!! :)
|
|
Toejam
from Perth (Australia) on 2002-07-22 04:21 [#00319011]
Points: 3077 Status: Regular
|
|
shut up JUNKmaster :) hehe
|
|
Toejam
from Perth (Australia) on 2002-07-22 04:21 [#00319013]
Points: 3077 Status: Regular
|
|
ok. i was just kidding :)
|
|
Spikee Dragon
from Newcastle (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-22 12:53 [#00319661]
Points: 4176 Status: Regular
|
|
Mm, That does sound good Toejam, I always like vinyl more then CD's. Listening to Joyrex on vinyl is so much better then CD, much more depth and just ultimately better apart from any dust that interferes with the quality. SAW 1 on vinyl would be great as would surfing on sine waves, Universal Indicator or anything else recorded before or affected by limiting.
|
|
Toejam
from Perth (Australia) on 2002-07-22 12:58 [#00319668]
Points: 3077 Status: Regular
|
|
Thanks, Spikee!
i love it when somebody else shares my opinion! yeah, i totally agree with you. thanks for posting!
|
|
phiz
from Liverpool (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-22 13:02 [#00319675]
Points: 2622 Status: Lurker
|
|
dont think its hard to find, i've spotted it out and about.
Vynil does seem to give some sort of different depth to the sound though. mybe its the analogue signal compared to digital, analogue give you warts and all.
|
|
Toejam
from Perth (Australia) on 2002-07-22 13:04 [#00319680]
Points: 3077 Status: Regular
|
|
Thanks, Phiz. So it exists, does it? That's it, i'm getting it!!
*picks up wallet and car keys, walks away*
|
|
Messageboard index
|