I cant believe Aphex Twin uses... | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 186 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613462
Today 0
Topics 127501
  
 
Messageboard index
I cant believe Aphex Twin uses...
 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2002-06-29 01:58 [#00288894]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



Copyright protection on his newer cd drukqs! I just read
that today, and it really bums me out a lot, makes me think
differently of him. that really blows a lot of ass, hes
helping the RIAA and other such agencies or want-to-be
laws... damn! his music is great, but he can suck my ass on
this one.


 

offline spoonz from Edmonton, AB (Canada) on 2002-06-29 02:06 [#00288897]
Points: 3219 Status: Regular



does the artist have any control over that? i couldn't
really care less, seeing as i had all of drukqs before it
came out. i think.

BUT, if he did choose that, he can suck my ass on this one
too.


 

offline spoonz from Edmonton, AB (Canada) on 2002-06-29 02:06 [#00288898]
Points: 3219 Status: Regular



that was only a little contradicting of me....wh00ps.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-06-29 02:09 [#00288900]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



its not in the artists hands...

he probably doesnt even know about it


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-29 02:29 [#00288914]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



It was only on the German release (on ZOMBA).....and yeah,
it wasn't his choice...

The UK, US etc are fine.....



 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-06-29 02:31 [#00288915]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



this whole thing is agaisnt the law

we have the right to make copies for home use... this is
clearly an infringment of our rights


 

offline Xanatos from New York City (United States) on 2002-06-29 02:34 [#00288917]
Points: 3316 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Let's boycott! On second thought...nah.


 

offline DonkeyRhubarb from Saegertown, PA (United States) on 2002-06-29 03:49 [#00288992]
Points: 552 Status: Regular



wait, i have a copy of drukqs, so are you saying this is
impossible to copy?


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-06-29 03:51 [#00288993]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I have an actual copy of Drukqs (YES Xanatos, I bought a CD!
:-), but it's not copy protected or anything.


 

offline Tasos from Athens (Greece) on 2002-06-29 03:57 [#00289003]
Points: 706 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ophecks: #00288993



me too.


 

offline J and The B from Chesterland, Ohio (United States) on 2002-06-29 04:00 [#00289006]
Points: 315 Status: Lurker



the ethics of downloading material always bring up much
discussion. most cd burners aren't even used for making
copies, just mixes! and I personally refuse to download
entire albums becuz I know that if I don't buy the cds the
artist isn't going to release anymore no matter how great
they are record companies inevitably only release things
that create capital. but thankfully the industry is
starting to realize that it sucks big dick. groups like the
strokes, the white stripes, and dashboard confessional are
totally fucking with how the big record companies are going
to choose what they release. did you know that on the major
labels only 5% of ALL the releases make a profit!!! denying
us the ability to make mixes and mp3s for players and
computers isn't going to make things better.


 

offline corngrower from the fertile grounds of Iowa, w (United States) on 2002-06-29 04:22 [#00289042]
Points: 4404 Status: Lurker



It's their music, their dicision


 

offline Asche XL on 2002-06-29 04:30 [#00289053]
Points: 4241 Status: Lurker



Yeah they said your allowed to copy your cd's "as back ups"
for your own personal use. This is against the law to make
cd's "uncopyable" ( <--if thats a word).


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-29 04:36 [#00289059]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



As I saidm, only GERMAN releases has thsi copy-prot
on....ZOMBA is tha label,,,

They did this as CD sales have gooe rapiddly downhill as
everyone in Germany has Broadband.....a taste of the future
(my BB us coming next month.,,,!!!!::::).....

All other countries are fine....and I believe there is a
waty around the prot...do a google on "ZOMBA drukqs
protection".,,,,

HTH....


 

offline Aaladorn from Hull (United States) on 2002-06-29 05:06 [#00289101]
Points: 123 Status: Lurker



The White Stripes are cool... don't diss them, yo.


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2002-06-29 06:25 [#00289142]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



You'd have him suck your ass? What the fuck man, I can't
even bring myself to copy such incredible music that Richard
D. James puts his heart and soul into. Not to mention that
he has no control over how his albums are minted, and all
that.

Just buy his stuff, downloading and burning it only hurts
him, as the RIAA already makes enough from all their other
copyright-protected bullshit.


 

offline wayout from the street of crocodiles on 2002-06-29 08:04 [#00289162]
Points: 2849 Status: Lurker



yeah...it couldnt have been richard's decision...as he even
said in an interview...that he wanted people to rip the
songs they liked from the album and make their own
mixes...as thats what he usually does


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-29 08:20 [#00289163]
Points: 21424 Status: Lurker



One time, I accidently caufht myself thinking, and I thotugh
")The only REAL reason an individual's political stand in
this argument would be strongly FOR buying cd's rather tahn
burning free copies... would be that this individual wishes
to one day sell his/her OWN cd's in the future and make a
profit. All other logic points to downloading for free as
the better choice (more exposure, more material, easily
obtainable)...("
I mean, oh let's support artists and buy their stuff because
it's the ETHICAL thing to do... yeah right. ethical,
...pah.

But as quoted above "if I don't buy the cds the
artist isn't going to release anymore no matter how great
they are record companies inevitably only release things
that create capital. " is an interesting idea I didln't not
not thinkim ov.


 

offline core from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-29 16:27 [#00289310]
Points: 1536 Status: Lurker



the vinyl copy of drukqs comes with a long copy-protection
clamp-arm protruding from the central label, and as the
record spins the arm waves about, tickling you if you try to
get close enough to press 'record' on your tape-deck.


 

offline Murray from Southend, Essex (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-29 17:33 [#00289344]
Points: 4891 Status: Lurker



It isn't up to the artist, it is up to the record label


 

offline rF from __e____e_________e______q_____ (Australia) on 2002-06-29 17:41 [#00289351]
Points: 956 Status: Lurker



if you really want to copy it, just record it analog from
your cd player into your pc.

my drukqs cds don't have copy protection on em, i've burned
a 'drukqs_edits' cd for my discman and nothing went wrong..


 

offline astrid-gil-botn from Londinium (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-29 17:45 [#00289353]
Points: 1649 Status: Regular | Followup to wayout: #00289162



zomba i guess licence warp stuff for germany - aphex twin
wouldn't have had anything to do with the decisision - but
sales of cd's in germany are well known to be monumentally
fucked so i guess they are protecting their interests


 

offline Cheffe1979 from fuck (Austria) on 2002-06-29 19:47 [#00289431]
Points: 4630 Status: Lurker



it actually has a very weak protection, i just had tu update
my iosubsys.dll via gamecopyworld. there's this other
protection out now which you can work around through
painting a black line on the edge of the disk.
those discs can't be played on many players (including
sony's although sony also sells the discs) what does
actually suck.


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2002-06-30 01:39 [#00289644]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



Wheres the proof that its only on the one certain cd(s0 or
whatever.... blah.. im sick of it, thats retarded.


 

offline Aaladorn from Hull (United States) on 2002-07-03 04:34 [#00294291]
Points: 123 Status: Lurker



I think pirating music and software is not illegal in
Germany (if I'm not mistaken) so I assume to combat this
they release everything on these copy protected discs...
Makes sense to me...


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-07-03 04:42 [#00294302]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker | Followup to Cheffe1979: #00289431



yes i heard a radio programme on the black-felt-pen trick --
they were asking whether or not the dumboes would outlaw
black felt pens now ;)


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2002-07-03 04:44 [#00294305]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker



I don't really understand... do you mean copy protection?
Cause yes, copy protection would suck... but copyright? How
is that bad? I'm really not sure what you mean here... I
mean everything is copyrighted, even if you don't get papers
saying so you still have a copyright...


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-03 10:04 [#00294806]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Followup to The_Funkmaster: #00294305 | Show recordbag



funk: It's copy protection we're talking about
here...basically the CD is created in such a way that CDROM
drives in PCS/MACS can't read em properly, so it's tricky to
rip em & turn into MP3s...They play fine on normal Audio CD
players tho...

It's pretty unpopular as it means you can't use your CD
drive to play CDs which a lot of people do...

The German version of Drukqs was released with this copy
protection because the CD market in Germany has crashed as
so many people have high-speed internet connections there,
and so dl without buying...

As far as I know, AFX didn't know about the copy
proctection...it was something ZOMBA (the label that
distibutes WARP in Germany) added...

Pretty pointless really as people in Germany could still get
MP3s from any of the P2P progs like Soulseek...

REFLEX: Heres the proof, you disbeliving thing you..Check
this page for a list of all copy protected CDs...
http://www.boycott-riaa.com/corrupt_cds.php...

"Reported Corrupt CDs in Europe
....
¤ Aphex Twin: Drukqs (Germany/Unknown)

....
"


 

offline Quernstone from Padova (Italy) on 2002-07-03 10:30 [#00294823]
Points: 1826 Status: Regular



Apparently these protection things can be overcome with a
bit of felt pen around the edge of the CD. I read this in
MacUsers but have not yet checked it myself. JAND have you
any info on the subject?


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-03 10:42 [#00294828]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Followup to Quernstone: #00294823 | Show recordbag



yeah, I heard about that...haven't tried it out as I've no
Copy Protected CDs but apparently it does work from what
I've been told...

Why these companies believe that Copy Protection is gonna
work I have no idea: anyone who knows what they are doing
can get around it and it's only genuine customers who HAVE
paid for their CD that get adversly affected...and it only
takes one person in the whole world to do a successful rip
and that's it...



 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-07-03 10:54 [#00294831]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Yeah, and it's not even illegal to upload software for
cracking the protection. They just fuck up those cheap-ass
customers who would not know how to rip a CD in the first
place and were hoping they can use their PC as CD player.


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-03 11:14 [#00294838]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



It will soon be illegal to reverse-engineer any Copy
Protection scheme...I believe it is already in the US (the
DCMA) but the EU are going for similar laws...

And you just know that whatever physical digital format
comes after CDs (DVD-Audio?..and beyond) is gonna have
hardcore copy protection...not the sort of stuff that
crackable with a Felt Tip pen unfortunately...

but at the end of the day, if you can hear it, you can copy
it: it's as simple as that...maybe not at 100% digital
quality but close enough so no-one would really notice...


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-07-03 11:21 [#00294842]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Zeus: #00288915 | Show recordbag



Sadly, it's not against the law. The creation of
backups/compilation CD-Rs of CDs you own is against
the law :(

Still, as long as there's line out and line in on Hi-Fis/PCs
there's a way around it, eh?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-07-03 11:25 [#00294845]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to jand: #00294838 | Show recordbag



The reverse engineering clause in software at least is only
legally binding in 1 state at the moment. The way they
usually do you is by saying that in using portions of
copyrighted code (of the protection) in the cracker you're
breaking copyright. Still, good, legally savvy, programmers
can make code that does the same w/o resembling the
original...

The things after DVD (that'll use blue lasers), whatever
they're going to be called will be a swine- even after
they've been out a while they'll be very expensive, moreso
for "burners". Still, I find 128kbps MP3 tolerable, so I've
not got any worries :)


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-03 11:25 [#00294846]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ceri JC: #00294842 | Show recordbag



I thought making a copy for your personal use or as a backup
was fine. Doesn't that count as "fair use"?..



 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-07-03 13:04 [#00294909]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to jand: #00294846 | Show recordbag



Nope, backups are illegal unless they specifically say on
the packaging "you may make a backup for personal use". That
myth started because some software house used to include
that on 5 1/4" disk games due to the volatil nature of the
medium. It was perpetuated by piracy devices claiming that
they were for backups of legally owned software- this in
itself being illegal :)

Still, as with all copyright, the police/FAST/etc won't
follow it up unless they get a tip off or the copyright
owner wants to take you to court.


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-07-03 13:07 [#00294912]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ceri JC: #00294909 | Show recordbag



wow...that's pretty hardcore...

Is this just for software or does it include stuff like
music as well?...


 

offline USACID from Death Valley (Zambia) on 2002-07-03 15:07 [#00295025]
Points: 788 Status: Lurker



I love free music don't get me wrong...but when i try to
make it my livelyhood and people make a copy for home
use...and then log on to a napster or kazza service and 1
copy can be shared with anyone (ie millions of people) i'd
be a lil pissed too. I'm sure rich doesn't care much...as
long as his rephlex stuff isn't harmed :)


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-07-03 15:27 [#00295045]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to jand: #00294912 | Show recordbag



Same rules apply to music as well sadly...

One of my lecturers told me and he used to be an expert
witness relating to copyright as well as advising the
government on copyright!


 


Messageboard index