i'm too lazy to look and see if this already on the site,,, but has anybody read this? if not, here | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 308 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613461
Today 4
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index
i'm too lazy to look and see if this already on the site,,, but has anybody read this? if not, here
 

offline brendan ether from the beach (obx, NC) (United States) on 2002-06-26 07:19 [#00285356]
Points: 796 Status: Addict



It would seem that Richard D. James has undergone a radical
cystectomy. For those of you not in first-year med school,
that means his bladder has been removed. While URB staffers
are hardly qualified to make such diagnoses, there's no
other way for us to explain why James' latest Aphex Twin
release, Drukqs, sounds the way it does: He's not taking the
piss!

All recent Q&As aside - absurd non sequiturs about
70-percent royalties from Radiohead, inventing Napster and
mixing records by "smelling the grooves" - Drukqs is the
most sincere album the thirtysomething godfather of IDM has
released since 1995's I Care Because You Do. In many ways,
these old-school electro melodies and rakishly basic
303/606/909 drum machine-constructed rhythms eclipse his
last two singles (the horror-extraordinaire drum & bass
"Come to Daddy" and its sparkling glitch-hop doppelganger
"Windowlicker"), for on Drukqs' 30 tracks, there's barely a
hint of James' self-reflexive idolatry. Where much of his
recent material has been all pretense and character, gross
creative liberties built around his own captivating
Chestershire grin, Drukqs is, once again, Aphex Twin as
musical substance.

Explanations for such a change seem fairly consistent: This
is old music. James has long claimed to record in bulk and
release the bare minimum of material to meet contractual
obligations, and pre-release Internet newsgroup bitching was
very much (and continues to be) about how dated the album
sounds.

URB suggests this has not one thing to do with the price of
tea in China, for regardless of when these
gobbledygook-titled tracks were made, Drukqs is right-fine
material.

First, that James would make good on the Erik Satie
suggestions of his earlier work by including mellow,
contemplative piano-, harpsichord- and glockenspiel-toned
tracks is novel and alone worthy of further investigation.
No, they are not mind-altering concertos, but then who in
their right mind would expect James - who reportedly
possesses only nominal education in el


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2002-06-26 07:25 [#00285360]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker



thats new to me... ;)


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-26 07:27 [#00285362]
Points: 21424 Status: Lurker



very well said, the only thing i disagree with is that
"drukqs is once again aphex twin as musical substance" I
think that the insane stuff on windowlicker/come 2 daddy are
a higher apex of music, not something to be disregarded as
music entirely, they're a higher realization in music
theory, while drukqs is lesser, and "basic" as u said (or
copied from somewhere)
Looking at it from his history absurdly ludicrous hilarious
actions, I guess releasing a basic album after such a
complex imaginative brilliant work as windowlicker would be
just the thing to keep his fans rather confused as usual.


 

offline Clic on 2002-06-26 07:27 [#00285363]
Points: 5232 Status: Regular



Why the fuck do they keep referring to them as
glockenspiels? They don't sound like glockenspiels at all.


 

offline brendan ether from the beach (obx, NC) (United States) on 2002-06-26 07:36 [#00285370]
Points: 796 Status: Addict



haha,,, they don't, do they?


 

offline brendan ether from the beach (obx, NC) (United States) on 2002-06-26 07:37 [#00285372]
Points: 796 Status: Addict



and i copied it. its a review of Drukqs in URB magazine.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-26 07:42 [#00285374]
Points: 21424 Status: Lurker



If he made an album that was just completely obviously
sucky, then it would have been too obvious that his only
intentions in doing so were to confuse his fans. But he made
it kind of good, just ... basic, which IS confusing. He must
have a different type of brain than everybody else, he's
just the weirdest person in earth's history of human beings,
besides maybe that tesla guy, I take it back, there's plenty
of crazy ass freaks throughout history, this one just
happened to express his insanity openly through published
music that can be played over and over and over and over,
until the cd decomposes or something.


 

offline Murray from Southend, Essex (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-26 15:30 [#00285687]
Points: 4891 Status: Lurker



there is a bit missing at the end


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2002-06-26 16:07 [#00285723]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



yeah, my thoughts exactly w M w...

I hope he didnt have his bladder removed tho... that would
really suck =*(


 


Messageboard index