"Good tunes : Shit tunes" ratio | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 228 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613457
Today 3
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index
"Good tunes : Shit tunes" ratio
 

offline grinningcat from london (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-20 22:36 [#00227162]
Points: 1073 Status: Lurker



i reckon:

good:shit

BOC - 8:1
AE - 1:1
AFX - 10:1
SQP - 1:5 (but the 1 good tune is worth fucking excellent
in my opinion!)

what do u think?



 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-20 22:37 [#00227164]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker



SQP:Actually, my opinions changed. I've jjust found after a
while you get into most of his tracks so its about 1:3


 

offline CORTEX from Canada on 2002-05-20 22:44 [#00227180]
Points: 3346 Status: Regular



boc - 1:1 (the fillers kills the ratio)
afx - 1:2
ae - 4:1 (which is the highest ratio for me)
pusher - 1:1


 

offline grinningcat from london (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-20 22:47 [#00227185]
Points: 1073 Status: Lurker



i reckon including SAW2 my AFX ratio would have been more
like 0.25:10


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-20 23:06 [#00227221]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to CORTEX: #00227180



fuck man, >[] 1:1? Even I'M not that harcore


 

offline CORTEX from Canada on 2002-05-20 23:09 [#00227226]
Points: 3346 Status: Regular | Followup to B3n: #00227221



too high? by your rating, you think that 75% of all
squarepusher material is crap! that's pretty rough, aint
it?


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-20 23:10 [#00227227]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker



fuck! I was thinking you say saying you thought every track
was good....

and yes, I was harsh, I agree, 1:1

definitely!


 


Messageboard index